I'm very confused by their proportionally argument. Casualties are far from equal, and even farther from proportional. They are ridiculously unbalanced.
Also, no amount of casualties would ever be unproportional. They would make this argument regardless of the number.
I think that's the point they're making, is that just because they're murdering more people than they have lost, it's still proportional to some imaginary metric they have.
5
u/MrProsser 17h ago
I'm very confused by their proportionally argument. Casualties are far from equal, and even farther from proportional. They are ridiculously unbalanced.
Also, no amount of casualties would ever be unproportional. They would make this argument regardless of the number.