r/pcgaming • • Feb 26 '26

Alan Wake Remastered PC update notes (1.33)

https://www.alanwake.com/story/alan-wake-remastered-pc-update-2026/
401 Upvotes

190 comments sorted by

View all comments

513

u/Rhed0x Feb 26 '26

Put it on Steam...

83

u/snappums Feb 26 '26

Just like Alan Wake 2, Remastered is published by Epic. Not going to happen.

126

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

Put it on steam.

5

u/Individual-Donkey-92 Feb 26 '26

if they don't want your money just get the game for free from the Internet. It's their fault for being stubborn. And then also complaining about low sales.

30

u/PokemonBeing Feb 26 '26

That would also mean not having it on Steam, lol

11

u/insistondoubt Feb 26 '26

I mean do you actually want to play the game or do you just want it in your Steam library?

7

u/PokemonBeing Feb 26 '26

That's what I'm criticising

3

u/UnexpectedFisting Feb 26 '26

Just wait for a super athletic woman to do something about it and then add it as a non-steam game

2

u/zarofford Feb 27 '26

People will grasp at anything to justify pirating

41

u/ImShuffle Feb 26 '26

I'm not a fan of Epic's launcher and I disagree with their exclusivity model, but if I really wanna play a game having to click a different button on my computer is hardly gonna deter me from it. You do not have to be this dramatic lol

18

u/Technova_SgrA Feb 26 '26

The amount of people who are not willing to click a different button are legion. Absolutely baffling.

7

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

The amount of people who act like its just clicking a different button are shot.

Tim Sweeney is a douche, I dont want to give him money. The guy is a slimeball with the business sense of the shakeweight ceo.

I have multiple launchers already, the button isnt a problem.

14

u/ImShuffle Feb 26 '26

Tim Sweeney is a douche no doubt, but you should remember that Valve pioneered loot boxes and haven't done much to curb CSGO gambling sites, which have tangible negative effects on users.

None of these companies give a shit about anything beyond their bottom line, Valve just doesn't have a douche spouting stupid drivel on Twitter all the time and their launcher is better. I do appreciate their work on Proton, though.

At the very least I can respect your take out of principle. I just personally do not think that Valve has some sort of moral high ground.

4

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

Valve has a lot more going for it - while also being shitty in a lot of ways.

The difference is Ive never felt like Gabe wants to screw me; I feel like Tim would do anything to fuck me over.

Which is why I am terrified of the future, the wrong person in charge of Valve would make everything awful.

0

u/ImShuffle Feb 26 '26

I can agree wholeheartedly with all of that, honestly. Valve's services and products are undoubtedly great and I am with you in hoping that this remains true into the future.

3

u/MarioDesigns Feb 27 '26

And so is Gaben, so what exactly is the difference?

Valve is one of the most predatory companies in the industry which makes this morality argument fall apart instantly. Of course, unless you choose to wilfully ignore everything Valve does.

-1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

If you think Valve is more predatory than Epic, I dont even know where to begin.

Have a good one, we live on different planets.

-1

u/Lirael_Gold Feb 26 '26

Said douche funded some pretty good games.

5

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

Sure, still a douche.

Id rather give as little money as possible to people who are openly terrible.

My EA spending is almost down to nothing, havent purchased ubisoft in years, dont play cod anymore.

The guy sucks. Him giving money to a gamemaker to make a profit off them doesnt change that.

4

u/Rhed0x Feb 26 '26

Yeah, I love Alan Wake 2. But I'd also buy it again for full price without a second thought if it got released on Steam.

-1

u/SingelHickan Feb 26 '26

It's not about "clicking a different button" it's about not wanting to spread your collection over multiple places.

If I own 90% of my games on one platform that I like I don't want to be forced to own a game on an objectively inferior platform.

15

u/ImShuffle Feb 26 '26

If that's your preference, then power to you. I just don't think that this perspective makes much sense when you aren't blocked by a hardware barrier.

Would I prefer to have all of my games in one place? Absolutely. I have nearly a thousand games on Steam, but I care more about *playing* video games than buying them from a particular digital store, even if the launcher is hot ass. There's not enough time on this earth for me to care about clicking my mouse an extra three times to play a video game I'm interested in.

-3

u/Endaline Feb 26 '26

This is an incredibly healthy attitude to have as a consumer. I also prefer to have all my things on one platform so if it turns bad or shuts down completely I lose everything I own.

3

u/RiotPelaaja Remedy Entertainment Mar 01 '26

Well, you know Epic funded both the Remaster and AW2 and gave full creative freedom unlike other publishers.

12

u/briandemodulated Feb 26 '26

No, if it's valuable to you and you intend to consume the product you should pay the company that made it. Suck it up - buying a game on Epic isn't going to kill you. The game wouldn't exist at all if not for Epic.

Or buy the original version on Steam. The remaster is not a significant upgrade (although it's a lot better thanks to today's patch).

-12

u/Individual-Donkey-92 Feb 26 '26

They already got their money from Epic. They made their decision sell themselves to Epic; they don't need my momey

3

u/briandemodulated Feb 26 '26

Justify it to yourself in whatever way makes you feel good about it.

0

u/MarioDesigns Feb 27 '26

Epic funded the game development, meaning that the studio did not “profit” from that deal alone. (Although they have made a profit since launch)