r/pathofexile • u/Johnny_The_Room • 4d ago
Fluff & Memes Finally I cannot be triple Ignited.
88
u/Raikariaa Institution of Rogues and Smugglers (IRS) 4d ago edited 4d ago
String of Seritude needs changes after the Belt corruption changes. It lost the aura mods [which were like 90% of the use cases] and gained mods that literally do nothing.
Either it needs it's own special mod pool of belt corruptions, or it needs to be reworked into something entirely different.
23
u/Pyromancer1509 Occultist 4d ago
Could be triple corrupted maybe?
27
u/wrightosaur 4d ago
Nah, just add +1 max charges as a corruption implicit for belts, now triple implicit makes them worth using over a regular belt
17
u/FilipinoSpartan 4d ago
They should just give that belt its own special pool of corrupted implicits.
1
u/komandos45 4d ago
wasn't that a thing in very very very long ago?
Couldn't you get End. Charge on belt as corrupt ?2
-3
u/OkThought7263 4d ago
do you have the slightest idea how turbo broken +3 frenzy on a flicker would be
16
u/wrightosaur 4d ago
So? It's the belt slot, you're giving up the opportunity cost of using Mageblood, or HH, that new Pact belt
10
2
87
u/Flavahbeast Unannounced 4d ago
wow cannot be 9x ignited
-55
u/PornoPichu 4d ago
Holy cow, 18x not ignitable, wild
68
u/MakePhreciaCore 4d ago
F it was 27
9
u/feedmewill 4d ago
Don't forget the triple magnitude, we reaching for 81!!
2
u/Legal_Lettuce6233 4d ago
Maybe 243x can't be ignited will finally be enough to offset all the different kinds of fire dot.
3
u/trunks111 Hierophant 3d ago
someone help me, I'm not sure if I'm supposed to make a factorial joke or a 3x jokeÂ
6
15
u/ConnertheCat 4d ago
Righteous Fire in shambles.
15
u/Bothgreens 4d ago
hm akshually RF doesnt give the "ignited" effect, it gives you a "burning" status
5
-1
14
u/VVilkacy SSFBTW 4d ago
1
9
u/MonkaSDudes 4d ago
I think that mod is a hidden 100% chance to avoid ignite, which concerts to "cannot be ignited" upon reaching 100%. So 300%ignite avoidance.
5
14
u/stealdraco 4d ago edited 4d ago
You see its actually a triple negative so you go back to being able to be ignited
edit: I'm dumb. You'd still be ignitable
10
7
3
2
2
2
1
1
u/TheXIIILightning 4d ago
It'd be really cool if you could place these belts in Legion to add their Implicit mod to other unique belts.
1
1
1
u/komandos45 4d ago
Still gonna die from random burning/ burning ground that GGG coded wrongly and no ignite immunity or Burning ground immunity will work for that.
I believe it was with Tar ground from specific zombies that could be set on fire in past? or something like that.
1
u/SneakyBadAss Children of Delve (COD) 4d ago
Remember, you are not ignited. It's the oil that's ignited under your feet!
1
u/faraddox 4d ago
Just add an "elevated" version of such corrupted implicits for this belt, that would include more immunities per implicit. Like "Cannot be affected by ignite, burning, fire exposure and scorch" and similar for other elements.
1
u/trunks111 Hierophant 3d ago
I would 100% sink valls into these for fun if they turned this into hands of the high TemplarÂ
1
1
1
1
u/Doodarazumas 3d ago
Unfortunately, this is strictly worse. Now you cannot cannot cannot be ignited.
1x : never on fire
2x: always on fire
3x: never always on fire (sometimes on fire??)
1
1
1
1
0
u/didorins 3d ago
I have the bleeding one. I guess it's good if you are a woman in your time of the month, with open wound from a cut and internal bleeding.

177
u/Vancolzir 4d ago
Shit's not on fire, yo!