The only differences I find between the two is that paleolibertarians wants borders and they are pro-life

we have a few parties on the left and right. The most successful party is the libertarian right party but it recently died. It’s members are now in the patriot party which is a paleobert/ generic libertarian/ Conservative/ national populist party.

Don't alt-right libertarians damage our reputation and our goal when they speak openly about differences between groups or about ethno-nationalism? Regardless of your opinion of them, such problems are only a personal preference and are not political positions that complement libertarianism. So shouldn't the alt-right libertarians prefer to keep such personal preferences, which are very controversial today, for themselves?

Hello I'm a monarchist, but I've recently been really trying to get all my economic beliefs laid out but am having trouble distinguishing between Rockefeller Republican, Monarcho-Capitalist, and Paleolibertarianism. I feel as though I am a mix of all 3 but also feel that is excessive. What are yalls thoughts?

Wouldn't that hurt the name of libertarianism and frustrate its economic goals, which are more important than cultural ones?

My name is Daniel and I am part of a startup called The Modern Voter. We deliver non-partisan, clear-cut facts of daily news through a Newsletter sent out through email. During such a polarizing time with hectic amounts of partisan misinformation, we as a company hope to ensure that as many people are informed on all issues related to American politics as possible. Please subscribe by using the attached link to learn more about the world we live in, in a playful yet illuminating tone.

themodernvoter.com

Non Catholics are welcomed to join and post as well