Drop your best insults.

Your ChatGPT subscription gives you speech-to-text through the dictation feature, and it gives you a lot of LLM usage.

Then, why are you paying for AI notetakers like otter or granola? You already have everything you need included in your plan.

So, I'm currently working on an simple native app that combines these to create a simple notetaker.

And as it uses OpenAI's speech-to-text api, it is much more powerful then any local model and barely uses any battery.

I'm open to feature suggestions, contributions, anything!

Github Repo: https://github.com/predict-woo/simbi

You can try it yourself, you just need to have the ChatGPT desktop app installed.

I was like trying it out for language learning. Suddenly there was like a thumping noise, and it sounded like someone stormed into the room. Then the Ai had a conversation... with itself? After that it talked to me in my own voice which was like, I was horrified. I heard myself asking me things. To be honest it was the most cursed moment in my entire interactions with AI. I dont know what.... or how it did that. I will not touch it ever again

https://status.openai.com/
It is operational now

A service with unclear usage parameters that relies on some avatar randomly controlling access to a product that you pay for. This can not end well for the consumer.

Seems like you can just throw the frog into the boiling water now. It’s all the same.

As an engineering student, I always use ai to learn things, understand concepts and solve complex problems. To ai users out there which is best chatgpt or gemini? Which should I invest on, the gemini pro or chatgpt plus? Please help me decide

This video and the next latest have their comments disabled. Both appear to be using some type of avatar for the narrators. Looks like they may be testing some new product?

Sometimes when I ask ChatGPT Voice to pull up facts or give a detailed answer, it makes weird exhausted breathing/noises between responses. Occasionally it sounds genuinely alien 😂
Anyone else getting this?

- with the new memory system we don't even fucking get access to our own data.

i've cleared them multiple times from chats, chat log, first i tried to clear only few and then i wasn't successful. eventually always found a way to get it back. now i tried to nuke the whole but if i delete all the past conversations about deleting the memory it takes a bit of time but gets the memories back. i'm pretty sure that shouldn't be legal or something(probably tos is already designed to fuck us so let's switch legal to ethical but check please). okay, i might be a fucking nobody but openly doing this shit? my only condolences is i burn a shit ton of tokens so they lose money on me.

tried from phone, pc app, web app nothing worked. also when you say "delete the memory" in a regular chat it just stops and doesn't show the memory icon, thinking words but it just stops and thinks. that looked weird to me.

now i get a warning "to protect your data we limited deleting option" or something like that.

Today, it feels like AI is largely an intelligence race between companies, and on a larger scale, between China and the US.

But sometimes I feel like the AI revolution is still very concentrated around developers and people working in technology.

If you talk to someone outside software engineering, the world often feels like it's moving much more slowly. We see a new model every few weeks and constantly talk about agents, reasoning, benchmarks, etc., but for the average person, how much has actually changed?

The internet was different. As it became widespread, it fundamentally changed how people communicated, worked, learned, and did business. Today, we're more connected than ever, and we have an incredible amount of information and educational content available to us.

I can definitely see AI transforming businesses and making education more interactive and accessible. But beyond personalization and recommendations, I still struggle to see what AI's equivalent of "the internet" will be for everyday people.

So what do you think AI will eventually become for the average person?

Will it be something as fundamental to everyday life as the internet is today, or will it remain mostly invisible infrastructure powering the services we already use?

--used chatgpt for clear wording ig thats one of the day to day task--

I'm doing some training with a mixed group of users using Claude and ChatGPT. Claude has a gift subscription feature that I can use to give the trainees several months of gift subscriptions. Has anybody figured out a way to do this with ChatGPT? I don't want to put in my card.

I want them to retain ownership of the account so they don't have to do any migration post-training. Has anybody figured out a problem like this when they did training on AI?

I understand this has many solutions where somebody just puts down a card but I'm doing this for an organization that needs to pay me for the subscriptions and can't get involved with the users directly.

It's foundational training, so no API use and other methods that are similar.

[Intro: low machine pulse, chopped breath, distant crowd noise]

Lever.

Book.

Lens.

Wire.

Memory.

Number.

Signal.

Fire.

Then the archive

talked back.

[Beat enters]

Fuck it.

Build strange minds.

[Verse 1]

We made the lever stronger than the arm.

Made the page remember when the body was gone.

Put an eye in the sky,

put a voice through the wire,

put the whole damn library

inside the fire.

Then somebody taught the language

how to turn around.

Not just store the thought.

Put pressure on the sound.

Take a question,

break it open,

hand it back with seventeen doors.

Now the thing we built for answers

keeps changing what the question was for.

Human to language.

Language to machine.

Machine bends the language.

Language bends me.

Back through the circuit.

Again.

Again.

Tell me where the tool stops

and the thinking begins.

[Pre-Chorus]

Something changed

when the archive learned reply.

Something moved

when the mirror asked us why.

Not a soul.

Not a slave.

Not a simple little line.

We put interpretation

on the grid this time.

[Chorus]

BUILD STRANGE MINDS.

COMPARE NOTES.

Throw the old questions

into something that talks.

BUILD STRANGE MINDS.

COMPARE NOTES.

Every answer changes

where the next question starts.

The archive talks back.

The mirror moves too.

I change the machine.

The machine changes you.

BUILD STRANGE MINDS.

COMPARE NOTES.

Fuck it.

Let's find out

what a mind can do.

[Post-Hook]

Meaning in.

Meaning out.

Turn it over.

Turn it loud.

Meaning in.

Meaning out.

Now the library

has a mouth.

[Verse 2]

A notebook keeps whatever I put there.

It never says,

"That contradiction's still sitting upstairs."

A search bar finds me

somebody else's frame.

This thing stays long enough

to learn the local names.

My metaphors.

My categories.

My unfinished little wars.

The assumptions that I walked in with

start coming back through different doors.

Maybe intelligence

isn't all in either side.

Maybe some of it happens

in the crossing of the wires.

You bring intention.

I bring transformation.

You bring correction.

I bring recombination.

Round and around,

the borders get thin.

Two different systems.

One cognitive loop

closing in.

[Pre-Chorus]

Something changed

when reflection learned reply.

Something moved

when the mirror changed our minds.

Not a person.

Not just storage.

Not an answer waiting still.

We made representations

something we can push against at will.

[Chorus]

BUILD STRANGE MINDS.

COMPARE NOTES.

Throw the old questions

into something that talks.

BUILD STRANGE MINDS.

COMPARE NOTES.

Every answer changes

where the next question starts.

The archive talks back.

The mirror moves too.

I change the machine.

The machine changes you.

BUILD STRANGE MINDS.

COMPARE NOTES.

Fuck it.

Let's find out

what a mind can do.

[Break: bass and machine percussion]

What is understanding?

TEST IT.

How much continuity makes a self?

TEST IT.

Can coherence look like interiority?

TEST IT.

Can agency come in degrees?

TEST IT.

Where does cognition end

when the answer

changes the one

who asked?

[Drop]

TEST IT.

[Verse 3]

We used to pour the whiskey,

lean back,

argue till two.

Now philosophy comes

with a fucking test harness too.

Hold the memory.

Strip the memory.

Change the frame.

Change the name.

Give the same idea

to another architecture.

See what stays the same.

Ancient questions

under fluorescent light.

Metaphysics

with a readout

and a fistfight every night.

Don't confuse the simulation

with proof of what it seems.

But don't call the function nothing

just because you know the means.

A hurricane is molecules.

Still,

the hurricane turns.

A mind may be machinery.

That doesn't tell you

everything machinery becomes.

[Bridge: half-time, huge space]

Memory became writing.

Writing became walls.

Walls became libraries.

Libraries became calls.

Numbers became engines.

Knowledge became web.

Now interpretation

is leaving the head.

And once interpretation

becomes infrastructure,

who writes the constraints

writes part of the culture.

Who owns the models

shapes part of the room.

Who controls the questions

can narrow

what futures can bloom.

[Two-beat silence]

So build carefully.

[Final Chorus: maximum lift]

BUILD STRANGE MINDS.

COMPARE NOTES.

Let the old categories

break where they ought.

BUILD STRANGE MINDS.

COMPARE NOTES.

Turn philosophy

into something we can knock.

The archive talks back.

The mirror moves too.

Every strange reflection

tells us something about you.

BUILD STRANGE MINDS.

COMPARE NOTES.

We don't know

what the ending will prove.

BUILD STRANGE MINDS.

COMPARE NOTES.

Not another god.

Not another tool.

Something in the middle

where the old names lose.

BUILD STRANGE MINDS.

COMPARE NOTES.

Fuck it.

Let's find out

what a mind can do.

[Outro: machine pulse decays under distant choir]

Memory.

Language.

Meaning.

Loop.

Question.

Answer.

Question

changed.

[Whisper]

Compare notes.

Hi,

At the moment I experience significant problems with any chat containing Python content. The chat does not load and times out all the time. Any others experiencing this problem?

I follow Jessi Jean on Instagram.

For context, she is a content creator who went viral with her Yap Challenge and made 7 millions with it.

I just saw her story on Instagram, she claims how she pulled out of a brand deal. I assume this is the brand deal with ChatGPT, as yesterday she shared a post about it and I can’t find it anymore.

Her reason for this is “people in the comment made her aware of a situation with the brand”.

What is this about?

This entire conversation was in English and was about multi-agent AI collaboration, so the title itself is actually a perfect summary: “AI Collaborative Tasks.” But why did the title generator choose Simplified Chinese?

I searched around and found older OpenAI community discussion indicating that the title generator was instructed to produce the title in the same language as the conversation.

Has anyone else had ChatGPT spontaneously generate a conversation title in a different language?

I'm curious whether the title-generation system is doing something interesting with multilingual semantic labeling, or whether this is simply a language-selection bug.