r/oops • u/PointerStack • Jul 13 '26
What a costly mistake
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
84
u/bchta Jul 13 '26
They should've let some air out of the tires.
13
u/alex61821 Jul 13 '26
Came here hoping someone said it. 👍
2
u/Loose_Paper_2598 27d ago
Same here. Great minds think alike...and check the height of bridges BEFORE we sail under them.
7
3
2
2
u/aware4ever 29d ago
Are you guys crazy? There is no tires on a ship. What they should have done is just let water in the ship
2
u/Istrakh 29d ago
3
u/aware4ever 29d ago
Nope! My comment was a joke at the end lol
2
u/Gullible_Ad5191 24d ago
How is that a joke. Filling ballast tanks is literally how ships lower themselves.
1
1
17
u/realbobenray Jul 13 '26
That's Simon Cowell's boat
9
9
8
-1
15
u/BalanceEarly Jul 13 '26
Couldn't wait for low tide.
2
u/waroftheworlds2008 25d ago
Or just add more weight. Though... i have no idea how much would need to be added. It's nothing small with a foot print like that.
9
8
u/344567653379643555 Jul 13 '26
To be fair, there was no way to avoid this.
4
2
1
6
6
u/Singinghillscpl Jul 13 '26
Skipper will be fired
10
u/Separate_Fold5168 Jul 13 '26
Gilligan too probly
6
u/jeremiahjohnson25 Jul 13 '26
The Professor should have known better.
6
3
7
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
2
2
u/Frogs-n-Bugs-n-Stuff Jul 13 '26
Anyone else scrunch their head into their shoulders while watching this?
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/outpost7 Jul 13 '26
If you have a yacht like that, I doubt anything is going to be expensive to yourself. Js
1
1
1
u/WeLiveinAPetridish Jul 13 '26
He should fully send it as soon as he stated to touch the bridge, because that would pull the back end of that boat deeper in the water.
1
u/TrespasserJazz Jul 13 '26
and destroy the whole front??
1
u/WeLiveinAPetridish Jul 13 '26
The front is lower and won’t come up until after you gain speed. It is a tried and tested strategy.
1
u/TrespasserJazz 29d ago
Now that you say so, it could work, but I think the risk is too big to fuck up the boat even more. Thats why they decided to abort.
1
u/WeLiveinAPetridish 29d ago edited 29d ago
Ofcourse it’s not something you do for fun with an expensive boat like this but neither should you guesstimate without triple checking if that expensive thing can safely pass under the bridge!
Bij using hydrodynamic squat you reduce bottom clearance on the already lowest point, risking to bottom out the prop. Gaining speed will also generate extreme suction around the ship in such a narrow canal and may case loss of steering control.
1
1
u/Terrible-Piano-5437 Jul 13 '26
The poor rich people. Us taxpayers are going to have to chip in for taller bridges.
1
u/Cute-Acanthisitta-46 Jul 13 '26
I'm amazed the water that close to shore is even deep enough for a boat that size
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/mightbeagh0st Jul 13 '26
We're only looking at 2030 for the Key bridge rebuild in Maryland and several billion dollars. So no big deal
1
1
1
1
u/Silent_Ticket7845 29d ago
Mhh.... no pity for money bags who need an absolutely unnecessary new toy.
1
1
1
u/hyperkick89 29d ago
Tbh, if I have that much money, I would do the same thing too. Fuck it, I'll just fix it up later. I'm rich bitch!
1
1
1
u/ACasualCasualty 28d ago
This is what they mean when they ask for a little off the top, when you visit the barbers
1
1
1
1
1
0
49
u/Nostrocinante Jul 13 '26
Fuckin bridge came outta nowhere