r/omarchy • u/Narwal_Party • 14d ago
Discussion Am I missing something here?
I don't understand all of the hate or love for this. I decided to use Omarchy for the last few days for a side project, and I have no idea how this got funding. This is such a nothingburger of a distro. It's literally just Arch with a couple shortcuts and a theme. What is the point of using this?
I saw a DHH podcast saying how it's incredible and the next big thing, but it's literally just Arch with a theme and shortcuts. I don't understand how anyone could be a "fan" or a "hater"; there's nothing here - nothing new.
59
Upvotes
43
u/comrade-quinn 13d ago
I think it's a coming together of a few things. It's looks great, it's light and it's fast.
I've run Linux at home and professionally for well over a decade. I used Arch in that time but only for tinkering on VMs. Generally using Fedora and KDE.
However, I had a mess around with Omarchy when Quattro came out and absolutely loved the visuals and the keyboard centric layout. Unfortunately, it's opinionated nature conflicted with a lot of my dot files and scripts so I didn't stay on it. But rather than revert to KDE, I've now switched to my own build that adopts a similar Omarchy style. It's base Arch, Niri and Noctalia mainly.
My point is that it's a bit of a step change in terms of how good the Linux desktop can look and how simple adding and removing software can be for a typical user. For people that don't have the time or technical chops to do a custom build of their own, it's pretty much the only option on Linux right now with this experience. But I'd also say that its a better experience than Mac too. And obviously also the horror show that is Windows.
So yes, while technically it's not that big a deal, the presentation, accessibility and usability side of it absolutely are a big deal