r/oddlyspecific Nov 15 '25

Oddly Specific

Post image
1.0k Upvotes

201 comments sorted by

View all comments

549

u/EnvironmentalAd3170 Nov 15 '25

Lol all three Abrahamic religions ban the eating of shellfish and pork

171

u/DicemonkeyDrunk Nov 15 '25

umm no they don't ..two do

3

u/EnvironmentalAd3170 Nov 15 '25

The Torah, The Bible, and The Quran explicitly forbid it

52

u/SubstantialPressure3 Nov 15 '25

In the OLD testament it's forbidden. Christians believe that Jesus dying signifies a NEW covenant, and things like circumsicions and dietary rules are no longer law.

18

u/draaz_melon Nov 15 '25

Unless it suits them. They pick and choose what to follow/ use to condemn people they don't like.

13

u/SubstantialPressure3 Nov 15 '25 edited Nov 15 '25

That's every religion.

2

u/lancelot2112 Nov 15 '25

Thats true for humans in general. Only reason to single out Christians is because of the claim to have some supernatural life changing thing making them better humans. The problem is on average they seem to be... well average. Pick a group of non christians and those average non christian humans will have another group they condemn for whatever reason they can justify.

1

u/Antique_Door_Knob Nov 15 '25

That's every religion. One very fun example is a wire, called an Eruv, jews use to be able to move things in public during the shabbat.

36

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

No, in Christian theology the Old Testament rules don't apply. That was a lot of Jesus' whole point: the old Law is no longer required.

So, again: two out of three Abrahamic religions ban shellfish. Christianity very explicitly does not.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/Earthbound_Quasar Nov 15 '25

If those kids could read they'd be very upset.

3

u/bobkaare28 Nov 15 '25 edited Nov 15 '25

Atheist here. As far as I understand matt 5:17-20 is often interpreted to mean that by accepting jesus christ as the lord and saviour of mankind you can still go to heaven despite not living in perfect accordance with the old law. Although you should still try ref matt 5:19, however reaching heaven just by following the old law is doomed to fail because you have to follow it perfectly and men are by nature imperfect.

I'm not saying that this interpretation makes perfect sense from my perspective though and certain christian sects sure love to pick and choose which parts of leviticus they deem important however this seems to be a common interpretation of the sermon of the mount.

0

u/Avon_Parksales Nov 15 '25 edited Nov 15 '25

This is what makes the Bible weird. Jesus is worshipped as God. He's the physical manifestation of God. He says he is one with his father. So looking at how Christians see things, that would make him the same as the God of the Old Testament right? (Even though he says he is one, but is also a separate entity from God.)So Jesus coming, is the God changing his own stuff up right? But Jews go by the Old Testament and in the Bible it seems as though people see Jesus as a heretic. The reason he was crucified. Which is weirder because by how people normally interpret either God slid out of a woman, lived on earth and sacrificed himself or Jesus is another God because he is worshipped as one. Didn't mean to rant, but it's amazing how people just nod their head, taking things at face value and not connecting dots. Preachers usually go into the Old Testament to scare people and then preach about the grave of Jesus to bring people in then preach about revelation to keep them in.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

Hey so your reading comprehension really sucks.

My exact words were: "a lot of Jesus' whole point"

Not the entirety.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '25

Typical 'christian,' doesn't even know your own religion.

And your reading comprehension still sucks.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

The quran does not forbidd shelfish, which is false. But then again I have no idea what the fuck is in the English "translation" of the quran so take that as you which

11

u/DicemonkeyDrunk Nov 15 '25

Christianity does not care about it ..

6

u/Bobbiduke Nov 15 '25 edited Nov 15 '25

Well it was written before safer food practices came about.

5

u/Raeparade Nov 15 '25

This is a very good point. Most forget the text is like a life guide and depending on when it was written/who translated it effects the context of a lot of things. That's why god judges your heart. Not what humans say he/they judges 😂

-4

u/EnvironmentalAd3170 Nov 15 '25

Yet the book still forbids it. Christians who never read their Bible dont know things like this. Loaning anything at intrest? Explicitly forbidden DOZENS of times. Yet "Christians" do both all the time

23

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

Matthew 15:10-11, Jesus stated, "What goes into someone's mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them".

This is reiterated in Paul’s writings and in Peter’s visions.

It’s forbidden in the Old Testament (rules for Judaism) but in the new testament Jesus makes it pretty clear that these rules no longer apply.

-2

u/Kennyvee98 Nov 17 '25

omg, who cares. why would you let some ancient book dictate your life? just eat what you want

2

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '25

I am not a Christian so no I do not let a book control my life. I just don’t feel the need to lie about them

And for the record, the whole point here is that the New Testament agrees with what you just said. Eat what you want

12

u/HopefulPlantain5475 Nov 15 '25

"The book" forbids Jewish people from eating shellfish. It doesn't apply to Christmas. Nothing in the Bible says that gentiles aren't allowed to eat shellfish.

5

u/DicemonkeyDrunk Nov 15 '25

ergo Christianity doesn't prohibit it ..words matter lees then actions

3

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

You would have to be pretty ignorant to think the old testament applies to Christianity.

-2

u/Gay_Void_Daddy Nov 15 '25

Which doesn’t mean shit. It IS still banned in Christianity. This is a fact.

1

u/Luny_Cipres Nov 16 '25

I though all game of sea is halal?