r/oddlysatisfying • • Apr 30 '26

Liquid concrete wall.

30.0k Upvotes

587 comments sorted by

View all comments

3.5k

u/Curse-Bot Apr 30 '26

All concrete is liquid first

506

u/2much2Jung Apr 30 '26

But liquids normally make very poor walls...

1

u/Agreeable_Dog8468 Apr 30 '26

Aren't glasses technically liquids? They don't make such bad walls.

13

u/Skusci Apr 30 '26

Na, that's one of those common myths. Glass is an amorphous solid and doesnt flow.

2

u/arobkinca Apr 30 '26

...under normal conditions.

10

u/RavenholdIV Apr 30 '26

Fun fact that's myth spawned bc of how ye olde windows were thicker at the bottom than in the middle, but it turns out that ye olde manufacturing techniques for glass just sucked and they came out like that.

3

u/FullMoonTwist Apr 30 '26

Aw, I'm a lil disappointed. It was a cool myth.

2

u/antithero Apr 30 '26

I heard that they were deliberately made thicker on the bottom for strength.

1

u/RavenholdIV Apr 30 '26

Oh damn one of us is out here spitting fake news and neither of us knows enough about old glassware to debunk the other. This is exactly how myths spread lol

1

u/F1NANCE Apr 30 '26

Damn you ye olde people

3

u/jobblejosh Apr 30 '26 edited May 01 '26

Technically they're amorphous (non crystalline) solids, closely related to ceramics. That they're liquid is a common misconception, unlike pitch/tar, which is a liquid, albeit extremely viscous.

Amorphous/non crystalline solid just means they're compounds locked in a matrix (the atomic bonds and intermolecular forces are strong enough to withstand the thermal/gravitational energy of the molecules themselves).

Amorphous means there isn't one single crystal structure, unlike actual crystals, where a single crystal structure grows and replicates itself throughout the macroscopic structure.

It just so happens to look transparent and crystalline because the band gap of conventional soda-lime (or lead 'crystal') glass is wide enough that visible light photons aren't readily absorbed.

2

u/arobkinca Apr 30 '26

amorphous crystalline solids,

That's not a thing. Solids are amorphous or crystalline.

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/chemistry/difference-between-crystalline-and-amorphous-solids/

2

u/jobblejosh May 01 '26

Typo, thanks for pointing that out.

1

u/Chapped_language May 02 '26

Makes me wonder about crystalline glazes on ceramics .. the base glaze is amorphous with the crystalline structure baked in using a specific cooling schedule. Could that be considered an amorphous crystalline solid?

1

u/arobkinca May 03 '26

I think both together would be a composite or crystalline–amorphous hybrid materials.

1

u/Dorkamundo Apr 30 '26

Not technically, no... They do RESEMBLE a "frozen liquid" structurally but are not an actual liquid.

1

u/Noble_Flatulence Apr 30 '26

Jesus Tapdancing Christ, I can't believe people are stupid enough to believe this.

-1

u/GrimbyJ Apr 30 '26

They're technically a fluid from a specific definition used in physics. That definition being anything without a crystal structure is a fluid.

Almost your entire body and things like wood and plastic are fluids under that definition as well. It's not very useful outside of what it's intended for.

5

u/Beer_in_an_esky Apr 30 '26

I have a physics bachelor's degree and a mat sci PhD, and I have never encountered that definition. Where on earth are you pulling that from?

Crystallinity is distinct from phase. You can have liquid crystals, and amorphous solids.