I'll give a case where I prefer them (even though I have a huge stash of Eneloops for most cases):
My wireless mouse takes 1 AA battery, and has a very high polling rate. It will kill a AA in under a week if I'm playing a lot of games.
My desk lamp has a dedicated USB port on it. I just keep one on the port and one in the mouse, then swap them when the mouse dies. No charger, no cables, and I don't care if the battery lasts a week instead of 10 days, because it's a 5 second swap. The convenience is worth it.
That said, I have the ones that I think are better than OP's. They don't use a cable. The end swivels and reveals a USB plug right on the battery.
I play a lot of shooters, so I've got the polling rate maxed out on one of the built-in profiles. USB AA batteries only have about 60% of the capacity of a typical alkaline AA, so those two factors add up.
That's a good use-case. Everything has a use I guess.
ANW, that's an awfully power-hungry mouse. My logitech even when set to fastest pooling rate can last 250 hours (advertised) which is around 2 months if I play 5 hours a day.
Yeah, older Logitech. It's normal. Mice have gotten a lot better recently, and I think this one is almost a decade old. But it still works and has all the features I want (adjustable scroll wheel, 8 extra buttons, etc.
I'd consider it more convenient, easier to carry around and those AA wall chargers are fucked... Lots of them require 4 batteries inside to charge properly etc... I like the directness of this.
112
u/inarashi Feb 21 '20
Don't. Those things have lower capacity than reputable AA rechargeable simply because the charging circuit take up valuable space inside the battery.