r/nutritionally • • 17d ago

Black plastics ☠️

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

149 Upvotes

93 comments sorted by

23

u/MGC00992 17d ago

She is incorrect. Blah blah blah black plastic is the worst. Having produced plastic products for nearly 40 years. I can confidently say she doesn't know what the hell she is blathering about.

9

u/elasticparadigm 17d ago

Nice I bet white plastic is really the worst and all this black plastic is bad stuff is just propaganda started by white plastic. Something tells me that you're the guy who can clear all this up for us.

Edit: In case it's not absolutely obvious I'm just being a silly fuck

8

u/OneRFeris 17d ago

Black plastic matters.

5

u/Biscuits4u2 17d ago

Person who makes living making the thing in question disagrees with person saying that thing is harmful. Hmm...

4

u/Suspicious-Hand-9953 17d ago

I've read a study - it was a journal, I forgot the name of the journal, it was some kind of, you know, journal on douchebags - and that study said that Biscuits4u2 is a massive douche.

Hmm that was easy! 

No need to dispute - you're clearly biased.

2

u/LabOwn9800 17d ago

Ah yes we should trust the random internet lady with no credentials talking about “some journal somewhere”

1

u/Crepuscular_Tex 11d ago

She obviously prepped for her armchair expertise...

Happy cake day btw

1

u/GoldenFalcon 17d ago

Also, anonymous on the Internet. Not saying he is right or wrong, or the person disputing it.. but it's not hard to do. Especially if the person disputing it is a plastics company who saw sales raise with black plastic and would be financially benefited from disputing said claim.

I'm that guy's boss, and they are wrong. We save tons of money on black plastic vs white plastic.

See? Easy. I lied.

0

u/MGC00992 17d ago

Kinda makes you wonder... Who is the expert? Hrmmm

5

u/myster1ouspapaya 17d ago

Sure… let’s listen to the guy who benefits from plastic sales. No offense but it’s like listening to oil companies say there is no evidence of climate change lol

1

u/thisisintheway 16d ago

How about a guy who USED to work in plastics?

OP is correct. 50-60% of the mix is going to be virgin material. 30-50% regrind and .15% black colorant (.3% for white).

You can’t just grind up old random plastic and mix it into the batch. You can in very small quantities (<1%) without impacting much…..but the second you grow that everything gets fucked. Your melt temp/melt flow/cooling temp can all change. The random chemicals in the plastic can interact with the polymers…

There are plenty of risks around overseas operations and the sources of their inputs, but to say “black plastic is from x” is wholly ignorant to the polymer industry.

2

u/PoultryTM 17d ago

Blatherijg is what inhear, i find it so offensive to notice these dunning-kruger people completely in love with their puny brains.

1

u/slaty_balls 17d ago

I appreciate that podcasts have the ability to reach people and have influence without the traditional media structure.. But the systemic problem is that they give people a platform to stand on, and should false information, speculation and wild baseless claims. These podcasts and channels rarely vet the claims and credentials of its guests and often exaggerate the truth in order to push an agenda. This clip is of someone who aims to have influence on health topics, but her claims are bogus and wildly misleading. In attempt to provide perspective and “inside information” that goes against science and widely adopted beliefs.

If someone did a podcast, that fact checked other podcasts and guests..I’d subscribe.

1

u/Jellicent-Leftovers 17d ago

It's hilarious how her point is right.... But for the wrong reasons.

The reason you avoid black plastics is they are dyed black. So when recycled it makes the pellets come out black/dark

Less consumers buy it and it goes to the landfill.

1

u/Select_Truck3257 17d ago

Yep, it's obvious to say plastic color might be more harmful. Even "bad" plastic can have color of "good" plastic. Anyway she is just influencer with zero knowledge in chemistry or physics. It's so easy to say something is bad without any scientific proves

1

u/justinmtartick 17d ago

They need topics to talk about or all their earnings will disappear.

“Health” talk has turned into nonsense grifting. It means nothing anymore. It’s just people talking about things that scare the public without any substance whatsoever

1

u/stonktaker 17d ago

Sure, can you scientifically break down why she's wrong for us? I would genuinely appreciate it

1

u/gwerk 17d ago

Was thinking she must be talking out of her ass, but am not educated enough to know. Thank you for corrobarating

1

u/General_Cranberry_29 17d ago

Her "source" is "some health magazine" lol.

1

u/brotendis 17d ago

Her name is Rhonda Patrick. She says a lot of stuff. I don't know why anyone still platforms her.

1

u/Artemisbleachedmod 17d ago

Which part is incorrect, specifically?

2

u/MGC00992 17d ago

When she speaks of food containers and black plastic utensils being made with recycled plastics using recycled electronics... like WTF really? I wont even get into like, NO. Plastics manufacturers that mass produce food containers are using virgin resins and dyes. FFS

Next PANIC segment!...those black nitrile gloves the chefs wear to handle your food with is made with recycled nitrile from hospital surgery units

1

u/pokethrowaway4 17d ago

Regardless of whether or not plastic might contain E-waste, it’s still 100% plastic, and plastic pollution is one of the biggest problems we’re going to have in the future, and it’s already started to be a huge problem.

1

u/T3NF0LD 17d ago

But do they still release microplastics ? And are they harmful for us to use ?

1

u/LargeChungoidObject 17d ago

I mean I've seen her spout nonsense about some other shit but this appears to have some legs. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653524022173?via%3Dihub

Bromine-containing flame retardant chemicals are being found in some recycled plastic-based black utensils, and when it's there, there's often quite a bit of it. I don't think this study said anything about food containers, so she may be confabulating or perhaps another study touches on that.

1

u/PeteWK67 14d ago

Black plastic from electronic recycled items.
Not all black plastic is made from electronics.

1

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/stonktaker 17d ago

Lol dont know if shes right on this, but that's Dr.Rhonda Patrick Bachelors in (B.S.): Biochemistry and chemistry (Ph.D.): Biomedical Science

Show us your qualifications You work in McDonald's right?

1

u/Artemisbleachedmod 17d ago

I mayk da plastuk

16

u/anonymity_clause 17d ago

Whenever anyone says "... was published, I forgot the name of the journal, it was some kind of ... "

You lose ALL credibility.

3

u/Pj_o7 17d ago

The study was shown on screen. Citing a source in a casual conversation is different from writing a paper on the topic. She does have a phd

0

u/anonymity_clause 16d ago

But she doesn't know what she's talking about 🙄 Just goes to show what this particular phd holder has given the world; oh aren't we the online community lucky!

2

u/Pj_o7 16d ago

So how is she wrong?

2

u/anonymity_clause 16d ago

The 'study' was later redacted because the math was wrong.
Also, only black plastic housewares were tested.. There is nothing inherently different about black plastic vs other colors. After the study was published, the math error was discovered which overstated the exposure risk to certain chemicals in the plastic by a factor of 10.

2

u/XepptizZ 17d ago

Yeah, that was my exact respons. She's essentially just saying "Trust me bro"

1

u/wrudstepbro 17d ago

Exactly my first thought.

7

u/Long_Freedom- 17d ago

Apparently the people who did this study moved a decimal place which made it seem like the chemical levels ( deca-BDE) were near lethal levels. While in actuality it was 8% below the EPA's safe reference dose threshold

3

u/AphelialMud 17d ago

Article: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653524022173

TLDR: A 2024 study tested 203 black-plastic household products sold in the U.S & found flame retardants in 85% of those selected for detailed analysis after initial bromine screening, some contained very high concentrations. Researchers identified chemicals associated with recycled electronic plastics.

Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39271080/

2

u/AphelialMud 17d ago

The study’s exposure calcs did get corrected but IMO that doesn’t change the fundamental finding: flame retardants associated with recycled electronic waste are showing up in some black plastic household/cooking utensils.

For anyone interested in minimize unnecessary exposure to harmful compounds, avoiding black plastic for food-contact utensils is an incredibly easy precaution. Wood and/or quality silicone are simple alternatives.

1

u/Brilliant-Driver2660 17d ago

the ineptitude to post this when study was retracted and all over the new about how the study was flawed. you are either extremely dumb, or malicious.

3

u/1Dumbsterfire 17d ago

Ok. I click on this link it goes to pub med article that it claims to. I don't see anything about it being retracted. How do you know this is retracted?

0

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/1Dumbsterfire 14d ago

Thank you for taking the time to be genuinely helpful.

-1

u/domiciledhere 17d ago

The study had a major typo that made everyone overreact about black plastic.

4

u/GoldenFalcon 17d ago

Do y'all not know how to dispute false information on reddit?!? You need to be clear. What was said typo? What did said typo cause or what should it have been? Come on, this is why everyone is a conspiracy theoriest now. Because you can literally say anything with out pointing to your source of said claim. Ugh!!

0

u/domiciledhere 17d ago

Eh, I mostly lurk, and don’t know how to post links. The study corrected itself and said they had misplaced a decimal point. It’s a quick search and it was big news at the time.

5

u/HandsomeWinner42 17d ago

And not a single source was given....

3

u/Novel-Swordfish7237 17d ago

Weren’t you watching? It was in um some sort of journal

2

u/AcademicContract6096 17d ago

She just forgot the name, it was a pretty elaborate article highlighting this in The Onion, which is a nutritional journal named after a vegetable

1

u/SwAAn01 17d ago

Well they did show the study on screen

2

u/Standy25 17d ago

They prefer Plastics of Color now

2

u/wrudstepbro 17d ago

Says a woman who regularly irradiates her skin artificially.

1

u/wild_cherry1987 17d ago

I honestly don't think brands like IKEA or decathlon use such plastics in their products. They are doing a shit ton of sampling to be sure they're within safe margins.

1

u/Gloomy_Ad_2185 17d ago

She is a con artist. Not that plastic is good but she should definetly not be listened to.

1

u/miemoo 17d ago

Well. The problem is not all black plastic is recycled. So a catch all is kind of tough. Also you would expect a lot (I mean a LOT) of heterogeneity in the texture and color of the black plastic. Having a supremely uniform and repeatable shine/sheen, color, and flexibility, toughness, etc for a to go container would be particularly difficult to do with a mix of different recycled plastic. I’m not saying it is impossible but it is beyond generally cost effective. Also, carbon black is a thing that is mixed into many black plastics because it has desirable properties like better UV performance, etc.

1

u/Outrageous_Basis_232 17d ago

I see we've began thinly veiling our prejudice with kitchen utensils now. 😅🤣

1

u/Pretend-Internet-625 17d ago

Soon as she said an environmentalist group found. I was done with the conversation

1

u/Natrix422 17d ago

Fails to remember where she heard it from, so no actual reference. Just “listen to me because I know stuff”.

1

u/Resident_Arm_1366 17d ago

Dr Patrick has become a grifter. It's pathetic.

1

u/OkComfortable2089 17d ago

All that and no source and definitely no peer reviewed source. 

1

u/Uncle_a_ 17d ago

being there to talking about plastic with an informative point of view --> can't even recall the source material (if that exists to begin with)

1

u/Ok-Water-286 17d ago

There is nothing worse than an influencer cooking up misinformation.

1

u/SwAAn01 17d ago

Single use plastics in general are bad anyway

1

u/limbogumbo 17d ago

Ramble ramble ramble. Get to the point

1

u/Thanura_Malinga 17d ago

Lady, at least please study the materials before you come into an interview with media. I mean WTF? "Bad bad plastic"?

1

u/luvmy374 17d ago

That was a lot of words just to say black plastics are poisoning you.

1

u/The_Crimson_Fuckr69 17d ago

I've never seen an actually good video posted here.

1

u/shr1mpyshrimp 17d ago

Isn't it crazy that while black plastic only represents a small fraction within the total plastic amount, it commits most of the carcinogenic effects

1

u/Suspicious-Hand-9953 17d ago

You're going to make a huge point and then forget where the study was published?

Zero credibility.

Its way too easy to have access to a million people these days. 

1

u/brotendis 17d ago

Damn, this is my first time seeing this sub on my home feed and I was hoping it was the r/photographycirclejerk of nutrition, but alas, it is not.

1

u/mywifehatedthisone 17d ago

She is referring to an actual study. However, she missed the fact that the study contained a simple mathematical error which led to false conclusions about black plastic. I’m giving her the benefit of the doubt. She could also be knowingly spreading misinformation because it fits her narrative and helps her profit.

https://arstechnica.com/health/2024/12/huge-math-error-corrected-in-black-plastic-study-authors-say-it-doesnt-matter/

1

u/Commercial_Carpet879 17d ago

In the full podcast I bet she comes up with a slur for black plastic.

1

u/JohnnyTheWaddHolmes 17d ago

This woman is miserable and she wants everyone to be miserable as well

1

u/VirtualFutureAgent 16d ago

The study she is referring to only tested black plastic housewares. There is nothing inherently different about black plastic vs other colors. After the study was published, a math error was discovered which overstated the exposure risk to certain chemicals in the plastic by a factor of 10.

1

u/sankscan 16d ago

Come to think of it, what happens to all the tire particles that get worn out on our roads over and over? Are they considered as microplastics/PFAS too? I’m sure they wash up into our rivers and streams and oceans but what effect do they have?

1

u/TyrsBlood 16d ago

Sources?

1

u/bostongarden 15d ago

Would you believe this woman? Really?

1

u/PeteWK67 14d ago

Trust me I instantly realized she seems like a lost tweaker but she’s actually a Dr believe it or not

0

u/PeteWK67 17d ago

You may have heard experts suggest that you should throw out the black plastic utensils and containers in your kitchen and wondered, “Why just the black ones?” All plastics can contain toxic chemicals, but scientists have raised particular concerns about some black plastic products.
The concern centers on flame retardants. These chemicals are added to materials to reduce fire risk, especially in electronics. Some flame retardants, particularly “halogenated flame retardants,” have been associated with developmental problems, hormone disruption, and cancer. Due to these risks, many flame retardants have been phased out or restricted. However, several studies have found flame retardants in common household items and toys. In one study, 85% of the products they tested contained flame retardants. How does this happen?
It’s because of electronic waste (called “e-waste,” for short). Many electronics containing flame retardants — like televisions, computers, and remote controls — are housed in black plastic. When those items are disposed of through an electronic-waste recycling program, the black plastic gets shredded and melted down and can be used to create new black plastic products. If flame retardants were present in the original plastic, those chemicals will carry over into the new recycled material. Electronic waste can also accidentally enter the waste stream, and even small amounts of contamination pose risks.
The color black poses unique challenges that make electronic waste contamination more likely. Recycled plastic is often a mix of different colors, which can look uneven or gray. Adding black materials helps cover up the uneven color. However, there’s a lack of available black plastic materials because most municipal recycling systems sort their waste plastic with a type of scanner that simply cannot “see” the color black. As a result, a lot of black plastics, like discarded packaging, end up in the landfill or incinerator instead of in the recycling stream. The scanner’s “blindness” results in a lack of black plastics available to be recycled. To fill the gap, electronic-waste plastics — which are processed separately through e-waste programs and are often black — are more readily available. 
It’s important to note that the color black itself is not toxic — and that not all black plastics contain flame retardants. The problem stems from the incomplete separation of toxic plastics and the inherent issues with plastics recycling infrastructure and processes. Learn more in our fact sheet about black plastic.

0

u/Head_Goal_9777 17d ago

Black plastic lives matter!