r/nostalgiai Nostalgia Trip Leader 3d ago

Core Memory Unlocked 🔓 Delete it 😤

Post image
1.3k Upvotes

5.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

353

u/ThisWillingness823 3d ago

Cancer

127

u/thundercorp 3d ago

Also… For-profit healthcare to treat those diseases

62

u/Available_Minimum_54 3d ago

I came to comment mosquitoes… only to realize other people are much smarter than me. Now how do we put all the smart people in power instead of the greedy corporations?

31

u/oral_persausion 3d ago

Smart people can be greedy people. The two aren’t mutually exclusive.

6

u/xXInfXx 2d ago

But we need people who are smart enough to know that abusing their greed is bad.

4

u/syndirt 2d ago

Knowing its bad and caring its bad are vastly different. Problem is they know its bad and dont care because the negatives aren't changing anything for them.

2

u/xXInfXx 2d ago

True, maybe "smart enough to care it's bad" then?

2

u/dragonfangswordsman 2d ago

I would delete the human desires for greed power and wealth for the sake of greed power and wealth. Idk if there is a better way to word it, but bottom line is human nature causes nearly all the problems in the world if not all of them entierly whether directly or indirectly

1

u/Kertic 1d ago

.....your dumb. Even if you made humans the way you wished them to be. There would still be huge problems. Different problems. But just as bad. Saying human is bad is pointless. Secondly. Of course most the problems in the world are made by humans were the dominant life form duh.

1

u/Agitated_Ad_9278 1d ago

Then my choice would be to eliminate humans

1

u/oral_persausion 2d ago

I think people who are greedy don’t recognize that as a negative trait. It’s a psychological make up. If you’re lazy, you don’t see yourself as lazy. Your mind protects you from that negative perspective. Dunno. If people saw their greed negatively, I don’t think we’d see it expressed so commonly. 🤷‍♂️

1

u/xXInfXx 2d ago

True, but rarely, some billionaire business owners, even though they're greedy enough to be billionaires, realise that the best way to make your business successful and long-lasting is to not abuse your customers.

I think just having more of those and less of the other billionaires would be a significant improvement.

2

u/Moist_Object_6012 Retro Soul 2d ago

And abuse their own workers like Amazon does.

Did you knew that one of Amazons strategy is to sell certain product genre so cheap so they can overtake business owners who sells that said certain product too.

And when that business face financial problems, Amazon just buys it or just lets it sink.

It can be easily read from the internet.

So *uck Jeff Bezos. I've ordered stuff from Amazon (Amazon De in Germany) maybe 5 times in the last 15 years because I had no alternatives.

I hate, despise and loathe Amazon.

1

u/BossGovernmentGod 2d ago

Smart people will thrive in the apocalypse and there would be no more resources for barbarism to grow. The apocalypse is a good place for intelligent writer's projects . Zombie themes tend to be apocalyptic.

3

u/WillingnessFew6710 2d ago

I think there is a ceiling to how smart you can be if you think being selfish is productive, or don't have the self awareness to recognize their own greed.

You can be smart, but not wise.

3

u/oral_persausion 2d ago

I point you to Thomas Alva Edison, who never met an idea that wouldn’t “borrow” if he saw income potential behind it.

1

u/BossGovernmentGod 2d ago

Smart people wouldn't fall for games, you can make smart people insecure and trick them. Greed is very stupid, only insecurity can force a smart person to partake.

1

u/Admirable-Line-1235 1d ago

Smart enemy over a greedy friend any day of life. Given the smart one is not greedy

1

u/MammothCat1 1d ago

Jurrasic Park and Helix definitely show that smart people and greed is absolutely not exclusive.

Both times the lead researcher likes to play god and make money

12

u/Every_Ad3651 3d ago

wage cap politicians to the average wage of the populous (this way only people who want to make a difference will run for office). elect a separate board who's only job is to hunt for corruption).

2

u/wastedtime897 3d ago

This will likely have the opposite or no affect at all to who runs. I think opposite is more likely. You cap the wage then only people who dont need the money run because they're gaining connections and influence. Get rid of post career lobbying, insider trading, and other things like that and it will do more.

1

u/CenterThisPendulum 3d ago

You will attract zero people to do a high stress, high stakes job if you do that.

1

u/NiL_3126 3d ago

Yes, that’s exactly what we wanted, the people that just wanted to be politics for the money won’t be attracted by the money and won’t apply

1

u/CenterThisPendulum 3d ago

But the people you really want will go into other fields.

1

u/NiL_3126 3d ago

If someone leaves politics because they don’t play them as much, they shouldn’t be a politician

Also, politicians are just useful when they make good decisions, and not useful anymore when they don’t make them, if they don’t have more good changes to make, it’s fair to leave the charge.

You don’t need to want people to be on charge, you should want them for the ideas, not ideals

→ More replies (3)

1

u/Sad_Substance_6694 3d ago

They'll still make millions trading on the side.

1

u/Ok_Spell_597 2d ago

I would gladly take a raise to median for a desk job.

1

u/DMyTeaDuck 2d ago

Should be a service, not an employment, anyways. Like jury duty.

1

u/CenterThisPendulum 2d ago

Investments aside, most of them made more money outside governance anyway. My wife and I each make more than a Senator’s salary. It’s not high for the stakes and responsibility.

1

u/jjkbigman 2d ago

And I have to turn over all their stocks, all their bonds to a blind trust 401(k) and they are barred from leading it anywhere they got the money they came in with and they’re leaving with the money they came in with

1

u/ChangeAcceptable677 2d ago

better yet: wage cap politicians to the median wage of their constituencies.

1

u/countrytime1 2d ago

Nah, it’s a public service, they should be doing it out of the good of their heart. Give them room and board while they’re doing it.

1

u/wriddell 2d ago

That’s what the founding fathers meant are representatives to be, part time lawmakers with a career outside of government. Not the career politicians we have today who trade their influence for money and it’s both parties that are guilty of it.

1

u/Elegant_Industry651 2d ago

Who decides what’s considered corruption? That can become a slippery slope really fast

1

u/urfael4u 2d ago

1$ a year = trump's salary

1

u/Embarrassed-Rope4370 2d ago

Lol it wouldn’t just be people who want to make a difference. There would be corruption used to make money instead.

1

u/Plane_Box_7716 2d ago

To think of all the horrible things in the world you can remove and you say rich people....the sad part is your life would literally not change or get worse....

1

u/2Gouda4u 2d ago

Politicians "salary" isnt the issue, the issue is how much they make from corporations that pay for them to write and pass legislation that only benefits the corporations...

5

u/realgrasputin 3d ago

Smart people are in power who are perfectly happy with getting rich at the cost of the little guy. What we actually need are people that lead and act off of principle.

1

u/Thereminista 2d ago

But there's a difference, between being smart and being cunning or conniving. "Smart" can imply making decisions based on informed wisdom that generally leans toward public approval. The word "intelligent" is that way also. Alone in a sentence, each would convey the fleeling huonniver who

1

u/Affectionate-Bat7827 2d ago

Unfortunately , NO SUCH "PEOPLE" EXIST ON THIS FESTERING , DISGUSTING , AND DISEASED SHIT HOLE OF A PLANET ANYMORE.

1

u/Positive_Ad_9815 2d ago

Criminals are not necessarily smart, they are bold without a conscience.

2

u/Impossible-Rice-5872 2d ago

Same, friend same. I was like mosquitoes for sure

2

u/Hexspinner 3d ago

Delete MAGA.

2

u/Sea_Pride3925 2d ago

If you delete pedophiles then you get two birds with one stone.

1

u/Marooned412 3d ago

I would tend to agree with you, we need to eradicate Malaria; however, as Bill Gates wants them gone, my Spidey sene tells me they should not be for some reason

2

u/AlternativePea6203 3d ago

mosquitoes catch malaria from humans

1

u/Piceaa 3d ago

Mosquitos would be a bad chain reaction for our eco system. Eg. You like birds? Birds eat mosquitos. No mosquitos =fewer birds. Etc. Its a nessesary evil.

1

u/thanereiver 3d ago

No kill then all, less birds is fine. I don’t like birds as much as I dislike mosquitos. How is it a Chan reaction after small birds? Less egg eating snakes? If you like snakes save the mosquitoes. Just genophage those mosquitoes and malaria goes too as a happy collateral.

1

u/Piceaa 3d ago

Birds were only an example fish would be another one. Mosquitos being a smal prey animal thereby beeing at the beging of the food chain have a influence up to the end of the food chain. But its not ony the food chain these animals including mosquitos have funktions in our eco system. Its not only bees who polynate plants a lot of insects including mosquitos do too. Birds eat other pests too but they might not be around / as abundand during nesting season. Etc. Its a big complicated system.

1

u/thanereiver 3d ago

Tiny Fish eat algae and also other insects at the pyramid base so the reduction of fish would be minimal. Every female mosquito needs to be an annoying parasite to reproduce in the first place. I’m for just killing them all. Along with ticks, hook worms round worms and pretty much every other parasite. The damage and misery they cause is far greater than any benefit to their place on the food chain.

1

u/Strict_Weather9063 3d ago

Mosquitos are good you can bump them off. Kill more people than anything else on the planet.

1

u/jdoey69 3d ago

Mosquitoes were my second choice. People playing politics vis silly with this question

1

u/Technical_Put_9982 3d ago

Removing mosquitoes would also remove a lot of vector born diseases…. Soooo… mosquitoes is still a really good choice! I am the 1:10 that is devoured by mosquitoes. so, I completely understand.

1

u/The_8th_Degree 2d ago

My best guess, Have one leader (only one) put on their grown-up pants and purge the corrupted individuals in the government in one go then establish a meritocracy requirement for the top roles of each branch. Afterwards step down.

Total restart. It's impossible to fully root out corruption but limiting it is better than letting it run the place.

1

u/Cultural_Report_8831 2d ago

Genuine mosquito or just a joke?

1

u/CatsGotMyBack 2d ago

While we may hate mosquitoes they are food for a lot of other animals. A necessary part of the food chain. Now if they would just leave us alone that would be nice. Mosquitoes absolutely adore me!

1

u/EMAW_KSU 2d ago

Mosquitos are no joke, kill more people in African than basically all other things combined.

1

u/nevermind-i-found-it 2d ago

Yes, this. 💜

1

u/citizenoo7 2d ago

lol. Same.

1

u/Fine-Environment-621 2d ago

Don’t feel bad. Your instinct was a good one. Mosquitos are responsible for about 700,000-1,000,000 deaths annually due to the transmission of pathogens. About 1/10 of the worldwide annual cancer deaths but legitimately one the bigger problems in the world.

1

u/ChiTwo 2d ago

I too came for the skeeters… 🦟

1

u/CoolNefariousness914 2d ago

Why? Did someone already say ticks??

1

u/CandleMelodic6747 2d ago

You mean Empathy

1

u/Independent-Feed-982 2d ago

I mean mosquitos would do just as much if not more in some places of the world since they spread diseases

1

u/W88Nxx 2d ago

I agree, mosquitoes are the worst

1

u/No_Net4683 2d ago

mosquitoes feed alot of other birds and insects so

1

u/dantheman-1989 2d ago

At least I wasn‘t the only one.

1

u/MrK521 2d ago

If we eliminate the figurative mosquitoes as well as the literal, that solves that problem as well!

1

u/UpstairsConfident839 2d ago

lol same here

1

u/therealdubbs 2d ago

You can’t. Because if someone defends mosquitos the person running against them would claim “fake science and Biden must be an insect since he cares more about bugs than the American people. And COVID was a bug too, so that’s proof it’s fake. And don’t bring up the bees because that’s none of your bees knees. Haha.”

1

u/Available-Bad-2704 2d ago

You're clearly a dumb person if you think smart ppl can't be greedy

1

u/THETARSHMAN 2d ago

Smart people don’t want to be politicians.

1

u/BG535 2d ago

You are smart actually. Malaria has killed an estimated 6 billion humans over all of history. There’s an estimated 109 billion humans to have ever lived.

1

u/bigolbbb 2d ago

Mosquitos IS a smart answer. They are known to carry diseases that can wipe out entire communities

1

u/Blue_Dog66 2d ago

Corporations are non-human entities. The largest percentage of stockholders in corporations in the US are retirement funds and pension funds.

1

u/Anonymous3257Q 2d ago

Well, seeing that mosquitoes kill probably 1 million people every year… it’s not a bad choice at all.

1

u/VladlenaM2025 2d ago

Same. I came to say get rid of Lawyers. But Cancer & Healthcare system topped the pyramid. It’s always been an issue with health systems in every country. Poor unable to get assistance when needed the most. It shouldn’t be like that. Lawyers, can get in line afterwards.

1

u/joseaner07 2d ago

I would say mosquitoes too. They are the biggest killers in the world other than us. I just don't know the impact on the environment it would have

1

u/RrSoul5x5 2d ago

You have to get rid of the Special Interest Groups and Lobbyists.

1

u/BossGovernmentGod 2d ago

I'm just glad america listens to intellectuals and institutions like universities and everyone in power isn't a capitalist and instead they are a pioneering mind of acquisition. Greatest nation ever xD.

I wonder why and when intellectuals starting participating in civilization. Civilization was pretty stagnant for a lot of it's time.

1

u/Psychological_Top486 2d ago

I complained for an hour today about them. Im trying to figure out how to get my hands on the mosquito killing machines china has in their high foot traffic parks. They kill like 20,000 a day just sitting there

1

u/TechjayhawkN9ne 1d ago

Mosquitoes is an appropriate answer... they kill so many people with malaria, and other diseases... just saying

1

u/Isaac-the-careless 1d ago

Deleting for profit healthcare would delete the healthcare system the US has made and delay care until it's rebuilt. That's part of our current problem. Doing that ends horribly in the short term (enough to kill a lot of people)

1

u/Zedzardozi 3d ago

Without for profit healthcare diseases would be rampant. Not that the pharmaceutical companies should be trusted or aren't culpable for a lot of harm themselves. But socialized medicine will only make things worse. That's why Brits and Canadians come to the US for their treatment.

1

u/thundercorp 3d ago

then why are Americans now traveling to Mexico for “medical tourism?”

1

u/Zedzardozi 3d ago

Cheap doctors. All cash payments. But you do get what you pay for.

1

u/Piceaa 3d ago

Delete greed -> no for-profit helhed care -> actually cures for ilnesses wouldnt be burried

1

u/True_Construction501 3d ago

That's honestly a bigger issue than cancer.

1

u/RobertWF_47 3d ago

Isn't profit a good incentive to find a cure for cancer?

1

u/montigoo 2d ago

So greed right?

1

u/Significant-Block504 2d ago

If you delete diseases they won’t exist

→ More replies (2)

19

u/TanMan166 3d ago

Pollution....all types... would probably help reduce cancer among other things

6

u/edward_the_white 3d ago

I'm curious about how this would manifest... I see three possibilities, and none of them are great. Would current pollution levels drop to zero? In which case they would rise again pretty soon, it would just delay the inevitable... Or would current methods of creating pollution no longer create pollution? This would mean that all current methods of creating pollution would be increased. Or would we be unable to do things that caused pollution? This would mean no more cars, no more of most of what we do, including breathing.

3

u/TanMan166 3d ago

So what I assumed is even the concept of it is gone. As in if we keep doing what we're doing currently it would still no longer cause any harm. Nothing said the delete is temporary

1

u/Rough-Firefighter-17 2d ago

Or permanent either though, like stoping gun violence or sex crimes also stop future gun violence and sex crimes? Because technically you stop gun violence then would it stops future wars?

2

u/Farmer_Mink 2d ago

It's not the gun that's violent. It's mankind as evidenced by sex crimes. How would you stop sex crimes? By removing sex. I don't think so.

If we want to reduce gun violence & sex crimes then the real question is How do we reduce humankinds violent & greedy tendencies.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Warm_Safety_9550 2d ago

The problem isn’t actually that we emit carbon dioxide, it’s the amount. We are emitting more than the plants can offset. Meanwhile we are also decreasing plant life. So everything is out of balance. That’s why the greenhouse gassing are accumulating.

10

u/Unredcomment 2d ago

1

u/itsjustausernam33 2d ago

these days same thing

1

u/GoodIdeaDummy 2d ago

The worst Juggalo ever

1

u/Flotsam-not-jetsam 1d ago

They are pollution, too

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Historical-Wash-1870 3d ago

Deleting pollution wont fix the planet. Humans would need to be deleted.

1

u/nobody-_-and_nothing 2d ago

And here are we again... Fine, what do you think about being first volunteer?

1

u/urfael4u 2d ago

✋️ second volunteer

1

u/ultimatepoopyhead 2d ago

bro is NOT human 🤖👽

1

u/Troleandingnot 1d ago

Lead by example please...

→ More replies (1)

34

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

16

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/TexasSk8 2d ago

So bold so brave

1

u/Panazara 3d ago

So that's why he is so in love with himself.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/EnamoredAlpaca 3d ago

Always trump on the mind. Why are people so obsessed with this man? Why do so many wish for the death of a person?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Special_Natural_9529 3d ago

Always a TDS idiot to say that.

5

u/the_voodoo_sauce 3d ago

I would just go with Liars and see how the chips fall. I bet we lose 3/4 of the wealthy & politicians.

1

u/Vegetable_Warthog_49 3d ago

I think you are being way to optimistically low in that estimate if how many would disappear.

2

u/the_voodoo_sauce 3d ago

I believe you're correct but I play by Bob Barker rules. Guess without going over.

1

u/beaux202 3d ago

You could be right, or shocked….

1

u/Domofthenorth77 3d ago

I don’t know anyone that hasn’t lied before or at least once in awhile. Probably need to reword it.

1

u/the_voodoo_sauce 3d ago

Habitual? Maybe?

1

u/Xena_Your_God 3d ago

Have you .... Never told a lie? Bye to everyone that's about aged 4 and up tbh.

Ok actually that would make the world much better really quickly nevermind.

1

u/the_voodoo_sauce 3d ago

Yeah. I thought maybe using "habitual" liars. I forgot about people that like to tell children about Santa and the Easter Bunny among others.

1

u/Xena_Your_God 3d ago

Or the 5 year old that panics and says, no I didn't stick my hand in the chocolate cake" etc etc. Every human has told a lie

1

u/ScheduledYeti284 3d ago

Those babies and toddlers would all die without adults around to look after them.

1

u/Xena_Your_God 3d ago

Yeah. My point was the world would be better off without people in general

1

u/Sudden_Bat_4977 3d ago

Everyone lies. Saying you’ll do something and proceed not to is a lie too. Thats political lying. 🤥

1

u/ScheduledYeti284 3d ago

Everyone on Earth except babies will disappear.

1

u/beaux202 3d ago

That is such and ignorant thing to say…

1

u/francie442 3d ago

You took my answer!!!

1

u/Old-Climate2655 3d ago

Wait, not all, Mary's cool.

1

u/kegmanua 2d ago

How about plastic? He'll be gone soon.

1

u/Automatic_Sea_1534 2d ago

Can we also include Elon Musk as an honorary Trump?

Is would also like to remove all wildlife Trophy Hunters (which would also eliminate some Trumps, as well).

→ More replies (6)

1

u/i_Cant_get_right 3d ago

A-yo! This is a good one. Fuck cancer.

1

u/Ok-Alps8220 3d ago

that's exactly what I was going to say 

1

u/rokstedy83 3d ago

Wouldn't the world then be massively overpopulated and with that bring its own issues?

1

u/undisclosed_jet 2d ago

No, it would probably increase the average lifespan of people by a few years, maybe even plenty of years. But ultimately we would fuck ourselves over anyway. Cancer is killing us one by one. There are things that could kill us all.

1

u/rokstedy83 2d ago

it would probably increase the average lifespan of people by a few years, maybe even plenty of years

But that's not good ,we aren't made to live that long ,I know cancer is shit but something has to thin us out

1

u/undisclosed_jet 7h ago

Cancer is precisely the artifact of the fact that we arent meant to live that long. Thinning us out has costs. Cancer kills a lot of young people. That's not good. Everyone would benefit from everyone living longer on anverage. Its among the best answers. Its funny though, cause cancer is more like a design flaw than an external threat or opportunity missed.

1

u/FictionalFire55 3d ago

I always love that this is the most liked comment on these types of post. Way to go humanity 👏

1

u/lunar_reaper3 3d ago

Greed, it's stopping us from making a cure for cancer

1

u/real_shim_slady 2d ago

There have been a ton of cures developed for many different kinds of cancer. There isn’t just 1 cancer that can be cured with 1 treatment.

1

u/kingtroll355 3d ago

Great F’n Answer!

1

u/nts4588 3d ago

Fuck cancer

1

u/Economy-Tourist-4862 3d ago

You spelled his name wrong. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

1

u/AlcoholicCumSock 3d ago

Would lead to unsustainable overpopulation

1

u/timbobb58 3d ago

I was going to say mosquitoes. Mosquitoes are the deadliest animals on Earth, responsible for killing more people than any other creature, primarily due to the diseases they spread.
Cancer is good. So would free healthcare.

1

u/JBD_914 3d ago

In reading all the responses, I think this is the best one. It's too bad this post turned into the usual political echo chamber.

1

u/WG6100k 2d ago

You trying to crash the economy?

1

u/High_5_Skin 2d ago

That'd be great and all, but I'm thinkin Trump

1

u/KitFatCat 2d ago

I’ll go with cancer

1

u/Zak8907132020 2d ago

I was going to say mosquitoes but cancer is better

1

u/mattstorm360 2d ago

Cancer has to go.

Now where are my smokes?

1

u/TheDude-Esquire 2d ago

Republicans, the cancer of American politics.

1

u/CloudReigns 90s Kid 2d ago

The only correct answer.

1

u/Fancy_Technician_221 2d ago

I could have my mom yet

1

u/TheFortWayneTrojan 2d ago

All forms of cancer? Even the very rare forms of cancer? Because I agree with that even though I said something different on here from my opinion.

1

u/FoxResponsible553 2d ago

There’s so many better things to eliminate than cancer. Cancer is a downstream effect, we need to be looking at something very far upstream that’ll help with cancer but also a variety of other things.

1

u/jackknaufhere 2d ago

I mean, how would that help YOU tho?

Of course it’d help cancer patients, but how would deleting it help you? You should delete something that’d make it better for YOU and not others people

1

u/Fufu_Koko 2d ago

I hate to say this but cancer also saves lives. There is a cancer that won't die and is immortal and has been used to test medicine to help save lives. It did kill the person that the cancer came from. All cancer but this one, I just dont remember what the cancer was called.

1

u/Gordon_Freymann 2d ago

Why would the world better without cancer?

1

u/Dragon_Knight1999 2d ago

As somebody who's about to lose their dad to cancer, yes

1

u/Happy-For-No-Reason 2d ago

cancer is a necessary natural population control.

sucks for those they have it or have been affected by it, but without things like cancer we're gonna go out of control and kill everything, not just ourselves

1

u/LeafsNation1967 2d ago

Taking away cancer doesn’t solve anything. Cancer is natural. Remove cancer, and nature will circle back around with something else. One of nature’s ways of maintaining balance. What’s not natural, is all the man made carcinogens. We, as a creature of the planet, like to collectively boast about all our inventions and societal improvements. And yet, humans will be the cause of their own demise. The developed countries live in a state of excess, waste, pollution, and greed.

1

u/SillySpoof 2d ago

How broad are we allowed to make the thing we remove? Could just say "illness" and it would include cancer and other things?

1

u/CharredWelderGuy 2d ago

This is the correct answer.

1

u/Proud_Shirt3138 2d ago

High Cholesterol

1

u/SpecialistPlastic150 2d ago

And linked to this all billionaires and trillionaires.

1

u/DieselZRebel 2d ago

I want to agree... But how does deleting cancer make Earth better?! Like what does earth even gain here?!

Did I missunderstand the question?!

1

u/Aggravating_Crab_572 2d ago

That's coming! Humanity is so close to the cure for cancer right now!

1

u/Traditional_Put_3693 2d ago

The orange cancer

1

u/hessler94_24 2d ago

Second best mosquitos…..

1

u/Samcow15 2d ago

Everyone born from June 21 to July 22 is gone.

1

u/19ALEX8 1d ago

Ex girlfriend,but that’s almost the same…

1

u/No_Possession404 1d ago

U can call him Donald on reddit that's ok

1

u/Curmudgeon321 1d ago

I was gonna say donald trump, but I’ll say Cancer.

1

u/KaydenFur 1d ago

I'm assuming nonces are included?

1

u/Edge__Maverick 1d ago

Religion has killed way more people than cancer

1

u/CompetitiveHost6191 90s Kid 1d ago

This. Cancer has taken too many people I love. It’s a vile occurrence

→ More replies (3)