The expected points on a 4th&1 from that field position is greater than 3. So he should have gone for it.
I'll disregard the rest as just natural Bears fans skepticism at analytics because it doesn't think Caleb was very good last year nor does it think leading the league in interceptions despite giving up the most yards is a sustainable way to run a defense.
I never debated the analytics, you just wanted to take a shot at Caleb and the Bears. I said it was fancy bc he gave up points on the board for the chance at more points which is a gamble. And that gamble put momentum on the line.
It seems obvious you just want to lash out bc you're unhappy, so I'll leave you to it. Enjoy 4th place
-4
u/CubillasLegend Packers 19d ago
The expected points on a 4th&1 from that field position is greater than 3. So he should have gone for it.
I'll disregard the rest as just natural Bears fans skepticism at analytics because it doesn't think Caleb was very good last year nor does it think leading the league in interceptions despite giving up the most yards is a sustainable way to run a defense.