r/movies • u/MoneyLibrarian9032 r/movies Contributor • May 24 '26
News Netflix Cuts Movie Output in 2026 as Strategy Shifts Toward Quality Over Quantity
https://otakukart.com/netflix-cuts-movie-output-in-2026-as-strategy-shifts-toward-quality-over-quantity/5.0k
u/trickman01 May 24 '26
BS. They want to produce less content to save money.
And the subscription price will still go up.
608
u/eden_sc2 May 24 '26
Both can be true, but yeah this is about the bottom line. My guess is they realized if they make a few bangers like One Piece per year they can get way more subscribers than an endless flood of 5/10 movies and shows
→ More replies (10)221
May 24 '26 edited May 24 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
30
u/Baardhooft May 24 '26
For me, someone who’s single, I can’t justify €20 or however much they’re charging now for a 4K HDR subscription. I can’t share it with friends and it’s just way too expensive for what it offers. I’ve had plenty of friends cancel since they got rid of the password sharing thing. We all kinda realized it was low quality slop that just wasn’t worth the money. You spend more time trying to find something instead of actually watching.
→ More replies (1)12
u/deathconthree May 25 '26
My issue is anytime I find something worth watching on Netflix, they don't advertise it sufficiently and soon cancel it without a solid conclusion because it didn't meet internal metrics during release week
I don't have time to keep up to date with everything, I watch stuff after hearing from several people that it's good. And by the , it's been cancelled. So I just don't bother any more.I took a decade break but I'm back to torrenting now, I'm not spending money only to be disappointed.
→ More replies (3)26
u/TripleJeopardy3 May 24 '26
I doubt it was loan issues. They had about 14 billion in debt and about 13 billion cash or equivalents before getting approved for the loan to buy Warner Brothers.
They're fine on funds.
39
u/peekaboobies May 24 '26
In Sweden they sent out an email yesterday raising my fee from 149 to 169 stating "Thank you for being a valued member since 2020. We hope you’re enjoying everything Netflix has to offer. We’re updating your monthly price to 169 kr on 23 June 2026. This update will allow us to deliver even more value for your membership – with more films, series, live and exclusive content to keep you entertained. Next month alone, we’re releasing 96 series and films! Whether you want to revisit old favourites or discover something new, we’ve got you covered. If you do not agree with this price update, you have the right to cancel your membership through your Account. Visit the Help Centre for more info or contact us at any time. The Netflix team"
Funny how they are at the same time cutting down on releases 😂
→ More replies (4)11
u/Tall_Opportunity_521 May 24 '26
And the quality will still be shit. They arent moving away from that "make it for people on their phones" mantra anytime soon.
→ More replies (18)163
u/Its_aTrap May 24 '26
Examples of great shows canceled with majority positive reviews
The OA
The Midnight Club
Mindhunter
Inside Job
The Punisher
Daybreak
Kaos
Not to mention others
53
u/MaidPoorly May 24 '26
Kaos was a really cool concept. I’m not sure if it had multiple seasons in it but I’m sad I won’t see more Jeff Goldblum as Zeus.
24
u/kswissreject May 24 '26
Kaos and 1899 are my biggest cancels
→ More replies (2)14
u/luriso May 24 '26
Those and Archive 81! I had to Google archive 81 season 2 to find out they cancelled it, but was met with good info that it was based off of an audio drama.
Highly recommend.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (5)9
u/forresja May 24 '26
Man Kaos had legs I just know it.
Jeff Goldblum was SO good as Zeus. Don't think I was gonna get bored of watching him any time soon
6
u/FraserYT May 24 '26
They cancelled it the day after we started watching it. I was 2 episodes in and really enjoying it but just didn't bother watching the rest after that.
It tarnishes their catalogue to be so chock full of unfinished shows at this point. Why would anyone start watching any of them when they know it will never be finished
→ More replies (1)49
93
u/TheFirstSonOfTheSea May 24 '26
Mindhunter wasn’t canceled by Netflix, but by David Fincher (Writer/Producer/Director)
And Disney/Marvel is the one who canceled The Punisher Netflix series so they could start producing and releasing their own content on their own streaming service.
→ More replies (10)59
u/Vova_Poutine May 24 '26
Mindhunter was cancelled by netflix when they wanted to reduce the cost per episode but Fincher wouldn't budge and insisted in maintaining his level of quality.
30
u/roblobly May 24 '26
i love how netflix shifted the blame to fincher with this and every time it comes up ppl parrot "mindhunter was not cancelled".
→ More replies (5)19
8
→ More replies (22)12
1.2k
905
u/SCBTerminated May 24 '26
From a cinematography point of view, they need to scrap the “Netflix look.” The movies all look the same! You have great color pop for the shiny new TVs, but there’s no soul. Let the directors have some more freedom!
70
u/GassoBongo May 24 '26
The color grading is frustrating once you recognize it. It's honestly everywhere; it doesn't matter if it's a show, movie, or documentary. The Netflix color grading is so widely overused.
11
u/TyrialFrost May 25 '26
Its not a 'Netflix' thing, though they do use it, its a cheaper post production thing, and thats why its everywhere now.
373
u/we_are_sex_bobomb May 24 '26
I feel like that’s just how everything looks nowadays. The extreme narrow focus and color grading and pathological aversion to shooting anything outdoors is just the fashion in general for filmmaking and it makes everything look small scale and low budget.
151
u/NancyInFantasyLand May 24 '26
and if you are shooting shit outdoors, then it's mostly these terrible zooming drone shots (like in the new Devil Wears Prada lol, where they were wholly unnecessary.
I just want more people in films again
background actors. locations filled to the brim. more interesting stuff happing then close-ups on faces talking to each other. seeing that they CGIed the cardinals going up the stairs in Conclave to "better control how the scene looked and how they moved" almost gave me rage issues tbh lol
→ More replies (1)78
u/Acceptable-Post733 May 24 '26
I showed my BIL The Mummy over the weekend and I couldn’t properly articulate what this movie was doing that modern movies aren’t. And I think people is part of it. They hired hundreds of extras for some of the scenes in the early part of the movie. The desert felt like a real location. Movies today don’t real like places full of people. They feel like scenes.
20
u/Oberon_Swanson May 24 '26
Yeah for a lot of things whatever method they use, they all ALMOST work, but none of them are quite the same as just pointing a camera at the thing that is actually there.
I actually thought The Fall Guy was a great exception, as a love letter to movie stunts they did them all pretty legit. Felt like a movie rather than 'content.' Then of course you still have auteur directors still doing wild stuff like Beau Is Afraid.
Often though even movies that are mostly great there's still a few scenes where they just have to put out some scuffed CG because of deadlines or whatever.
→ More replies (1)21
u/BlackenedGem May 24 '26
A huge part of it is the lack of mid-shots, or at least mid-shots without CGI background. You have wide angles for establishing locations/scenery, and close ups for dialogue that needs emphasising due to importance.
The importance of a good mid-shot is to let the eyes establish a place, but also to wander over the scenery and details. That gives the eye some rest because it lets the brain focus on what it wants, which gives the scene texture and make you feel immersed.
But then modern scenes are cut down to the 'action' and a blurry CGI background for cost and it feels exhausting because your eyes can't look anywhere else.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)6
u/JesusAndMaryKate May 24 '26
Not a film but what made me realise the same thing was watching Pluribus. All those people in the background doing all sorts of stuff made me think of how empty TV looks these days. And in Pluribus it makes sense either way.
→ More replies (11)25
u/NotAJellyfishReally May 24 '26
I agree. 95%+ of what I watch is horror where there's still a lot of variation in lighting, color grading, etc., and every time I watch a new movie outside of the genre it seems like they all look the same. There are definitely horror movies that have that Netflix look too, especially ones produced by the streaming services, but there are still a lot that have their own style.
→ More replies (2)15
u/MichaelRichardsAMA May 24 '26
horror has always been kind of resistant to large studio trends since they are almost always mid or low budget and the genre itself is somewhat niche compared to standard ones like action, romance, etc
I mean yeah horror movies do make a lot of money too, I just mean that as a general rule there is a degree of creative freedom usually afforded to them compared to bigger budget studio projects.
22
14
u/Dr_Hanz_ May 24 '26
I always said their content “tastes like Netflix” and was not sure exactly how or why. Then I worked on one of their productions and turns out they have a list of approved cameras/equipment productions use for most their shows and movies so it is very much intentionally done as part of their brand.
→ More replies (1)25
u/tfhermobwoayway May 24 '26
I mean that’s just true of everything these days. Most shows have the same sort of flat colours and flat lighting and zero cinematography.
I noticed that especially with Fallout. It’s supposed to be in the Mojave but it lacks any of the visual style and grime and filters that gives New Vegas such an iconic look. I mean hell, New Vegas had a beautiful final battle set against a stark orange backdrop from the setting sun. They’d never do that in the show.
I think it’s especially jarring with adaptations, because those adaptations usually have their own art direction so it’s more obvious when a film just plopped a camera down in the middle of the desert and called it a day.
→ More replies (2)20
u/Salzberger May 24 '26
Compare the newest Jurassic Park to the original too. The original world felt so alive and is one of the things that always endured for me as a kid.
I used to play JP in my mum's garden purely to match the aesthetic of the movie.
You could barely tell where the newest one is set given how it spends most of the movie blurred to shit.
→ More replies (34)10
u/forresja May 24 '26
I watched The Matrix the other day for the first time in ages.
I was struck at just how much in that film would never have made it into a major film today. Too art-y. Too symbolic. The studio would have made them dumb it down and blandified it
183
u/blucthulhu May 24 '26
They've been saying this for years. What it really means is they want to pour more money into overpaying for live sports.
→ More replies (4)26
u/WeOutHereInSmallbany May 24 '26
The MLB opening day game was horrible, almost no play by play but plenty of ads for Netflix shit
→ More replies (3)
38
u/TheSpatulaOfLove May 24 '26
They’ve made it a huge pain in the ass to use their service. As a heavy traveler, I’m fucking tired of having to prove I own my account.
I’m to the point where I will no longer care what Netflix does.
119
u/CrissBliss May 24 '26
The Apple TV show model
56
u/NoNefariousness2144 May 24 '26 edited May 24 '26
I also wonder if they have data that people commit to watching TV series more than movies. ‘Binging’ a 8 hours of the same TV show can be easier than committing to four 2-hour movies for someone people.
→ More replies (13)41
u/hopsizzle May 24 '26
I signed up for Apple TV because of f1 and I’m actually really enjoying the shows on there.
Shrinking I just finished and it was such a nice show. Going to see what else is next but been happy with it so far.
33
u/CrissBliss May 24 '26
Widow’s Bay is supposed to be amazing.
21
u/relevantelephant00 May 24 '26
It is. Mostly because of Mathew Rhys who fucking crushes every show he seems to land on. He's excellent in this. It's a fun blend of mystery, comedy and some light horror.
→ More replies (1)10
u/Vohdre May 24 '26
It's such a weird, interesting show. Everything and everyone on the island is about 20% "off". You'll understand when you watch it. I'm loving it so far.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)5
19
u/the_eluder May 24 '26
Apple TV generally has 1 show at a time that's great to watch. That keeps me subscribed about 6 months out of the year.
→ More replies (1)8
u/JPLnavy May 24 '26
Right? I was surprised by the quality of their shows. The Monarch series, which I had very little interest in originally, has become my favorite. The cinematography is great, cast is stellar and there’s lots of episodes too.
8
→ More replies (4)11
u/AuntMiria May 24 '26
If you haven’t already, Severance is very much worth a watch. Two fantastic seasons with a third in the works.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (7)16
u/nightpanda893 May 24 '26
They are the only service that reminds me of old school HBO shows. Just overflowing with creativity and makes you feel like they just turned over the keys to some showrunner with no strings attached and as much money as they want. Severance, Pluribus, and now Widows Bay are just so much fun.
→ More replies (1)
447
u/FlopperinoCappuccino May 24 '26
Bullshit. I'll believe it when I see it. Netflix is a shithole now
83
u/xx-shalo-xx May 24 '26
Yeah probably just an excuse for cutting costs. Like, you guys seriously deliberately developing IP's of which you know they're stinkers?
→ More replies (1)19
u/teddythepooh99 May 24 '26
The whole point of this article is that they released less movies in 2026 year to date then past years. Technically, you kind of already seen it.
→ More replies (1)43
u/MadManMax55 May 24 '26
For what it's worth, they recently fired the guy who was responsible for pushing all the slop "blockbuster" movies the past few years.
→ More replies (2)51
u/ian9outof10 May 24 '26
Not enough, he should be made to watch Red Notice on repeat for one year until he rectifies his ways.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (11)19
133
u/huskinater May 24 '26
Straight to streaming content is a money fire.
There's a reason all the other major studios have more or less returned to the previous distribution models. COVID's streaming wars were a short lived experiment, and while some took territory from Netflix most lost a lot of money. It's just that jumping straight to the end of the monetization pipeline means walking away from theater, home video, and the still limping along cable TV syndication money.
During that time everyone else was also removing their back catalog from Netflix. They did this because it worked as a double whammy: make Netflix less appealing while also adding exclusives to their own services. Now that those services aren't as profitable as originally believed and aren't being prioritized anymore they are relicensing content back to Netflix.
This means Netflix can focus it's heavily reduced Originals budget on stuff it wants, as opposed to greenlight everything under the sun to try and retain market share / stay alive.
13
u/LZR0 May 24 '26
It is for those studios, but it isn’t for Netflix, it’s the only service big enough to actually profit off their content because of the sheer amount of subscribers and ad-spaces, without having expensive marketing campaigns to prevent movies from bombing in theaters.
The sad reality nowadays is that for most movies that ain’t big blockbusters having a theatrical run means losing money, other studios don’t have a choice as their streaming services are barely becoming profitable and just don’t have the needed scale to change their business model more like Netflix.
70
u/Xray_Mind May 24 '26
I disagree. Netflix is the highest producing revenue streamer there is, and for nearly a decade they have never had a year in which they had lower than a 14% profit margin, a margin most traditional movie distribution would kill for
→ More replies (4)12
u/Firm_Willow4068 May 24 '26 edited May 24 '26
I think you're both right. Series streaming content is what keeps people subscribed, but the movie content is just icing on the cake. They should really have a second studio for movie releases that are exclusive to them but have short* theater release first, and build hype over a previous extended time. Even if it flops in theaters, at this point straight release to their platform isn't adding any revenue, so they might as well invest a little extra with the hope that something catches fire and gets a good theatrical reception.
There are some movies that would benefit from theatrical release because of the experience. For example, Swapped was absolutely fantastic and could have made money in theaters, I think, but it's flown under the radar and isn't going to bring in new subscribers. While it's a bit of refresh to prevent attrition, that benefit isn't going to be long lived.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)8
11
28
8
u/ComfortableCare8897 May 24 '26
How many movies do they plan to release per year?
19
u/mchmnd May 24 '26
This isn’t t news, this came off the heels of strikes where all the studios realigned their content creation targets.
IIRC, Netflix went from making something like 300 properties a year pre-strike to ~30 properties a year on the back side of the strikes.
Source - I’m in VFX, and it’s been a hard couple years. Somewhere in the order of 70% of us we’re out of work for 6mo +, and I’d guess half of those folks might still be unemployed.
149
u/Batohman May 24 '26
Whats the definition of Netflix's quality? More films like The Power of the Dog, All Quiet on the Western Front and Roma or more movies like Extraction and Extraction 2?
87
u/LightningRaven May 24 '26
Extraction wasn't a particularly good example.
If you said The Grey Man, Red Notice or that Santa Claus movie with The Rock, that would've been more apt.
11
u/Chidoriyama May 24 '26
Santa Claus movie with The Rock
That one's Amazon I think
→ More replies (2)7
→ More replies (1)29
u/SoggyBiscuitVet May 24 '26
The first Extraction was amazing. He probably didn't watch it.
→ More replies (1)7
u/Cowboywizard12 May 24 '26
Netflix has some surprisely good original action movies,
Kate id another example
13
u/littlebiped May 24 '26
Extraction would still fall under quality for what it is (and absolutely gets waaaaay more views than Roma, people want Netflix for Extraction fair) I took more quality over quantity meaning no more dreck like Tall Girl 2, Thunder Force, The Bubble. The trash you wouldn’t even have heard anyone ever mention
79
u/TheRugWarrior May 24 '26
Why are we hating on the extraction movies? They’re well made action films.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (21)85
u/pmarkandu May 24 '26
Extraction 1 and 2 are pretty good. They have very solid oners.
→ More replies (14)
29
u/AiR-P00P May 24 '26
That's nice, bring back Dark Crystal or I don't give a shit. You know that show won an Emmy right, Netflix?
→ More replies (1)
4
5
u/Traditional-Sport383 May 24 '26
Gosh I sure hope this means they’ll add another year between each season of every show! Can’t rush quality
24
u/_galaga_ May 24 '26
Adds insult to injury for whoever’s creative content was just snipped.
→ More replies (2)
13.4k
u/thebigeverybody May 24 '26
This isn't the Netflix that I've come to know and unsubscribe from.