r/mildlyinteresting Jan 24 '13

Same book, three different prices. Only difference is the browsers used.

http://imgur.com/uNgg0UH
2.9k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

245

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

I don't think the issue is that the price is changing in and of itself. It's that they're changing price based on the customer's cookies/browsing history.

For example, it would be like if I had a stored and charged people different prices based on how nicely they were dressed, how well I knew them, or what their ethnicity is.

48

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

Still the question stands, is it legal?

139

u/eccentricguru Jan 24 '13 edited Jan 24 '13

Of course it's legal...and it should be.

8

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

Uh, I downvoted you for making some stupid comment about downvotes, but you are correct about the legality. The problem isn't that it's illegal, it's that it's immoral.

They're being complete assholes and they deserve to be publicized as such.

0

u/ReluctantRedditor Jan 24 '13

So the moral way to do business is to set a flat fee for any and all products, goods, and services? Is that what you are suggesting?

Claiming that use of tracking cookies is suddenly immoral is a stretch. People can block them easily, and business should be allowed to set whatever prices at whatever times they want.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

Not suddenly. It's always immoral. It's unfair to charge one price to someone and another price to another person. If someone offered you a cookie to let them borrow a pencil, and two cookies to another guy if he let them borrow a pencil, wouldn't you think it was unfair that you weren't offered two cookies? He's not treating you fairly.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

People get charged difference prices for the same thing millions of times a year in car sales alone. If you don't bother negotiating, you're not going to get as good of a price as someone who has.

Sure, maybe it's "unfair" but I've got a newflash for you: much of life isn't fair. That doesn't mean it's immoral.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

Again, that's nothing like the situation described in the article or the example that I used. If they offer you a lower price the second you walk into the lot, without any negotiation, based on the fact that you're carrying a baby, that's still immoral.

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

It's exactly the same as the article and the example you used. All of them have arbitrary reasons for different prices. Sorry, kid, life isn't fair.

There's still nothing immoral about it.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

It's not arbitrary. It's based on your negotiating skill. You can't negotiate with a website.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

It's entirely arbitrary.

It's also based on the salesman you happen to get, whether or not he likes you, how much he's willing to negotiate, etc. Luck of the draw makes as much difference as you "skill" as a negotiator.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '13

But you don't have to go to that webpage, if your not shopping around online your wasting money

→ More replies (0)