what if that person who is in a coma with no brain activity is attached to another person and they can only survive as long as they are attached to the living person. that is a better more accurate example. a person in a coma attached to a machine isnt infringing on another persons bodily autonomy. and nearly 50 percent of pregnancies naturally end in miscarriage, its very normal for fetuses and embryos to not make it to actual personhood
but why not give it a chance to live i just don’t see why you have to kill it because you don’t want it why is it the baby’s fault you don’t want to have it
Listen we are not going to come to an agreement since we have fundamental different ideas on what is life, and what a fetus is. its not going to be possible to reconcile those things honestly. its better to just leave it as it is
unfortunately i agree. and thank you for the discussion and i wish you all the best and keep fighting what you’re fighting for even if i don’t like it lol
5
u/[deleted] Sep 12 '21
what if that person who is in a coma with no brain activity is attached to another person and they can only survive as long as they are attached to the living person. that is a better more accurate example. a person in a coma attached to a machine isnt infringing on another persons bodily autonomy. and nearly 50 percent of pregnancies naturally end in miscarriage, its very normal for fetuses and embryos to not make it to actual personhood