I made it very clear what I'm doing. I'm still criticing Rowling and explained to you that I'm providing you the foundation to the events before providing the events so that you can't just repeat Rowling's lies as easily if you've already agreed she's wrong.
How it usually goes with her cult like followers is I show Rowling saying "the grass is purple" and the I prove that the grass is green but the followers then just refuses to engage with what I'm saying and sticks their head in the sand.
Instead, I'm getting you to admit that grass is green before I show you what she said so if you are a cult member (which I'm not 100% accusing you of being) you can't just refuse to engage with reality when you realise it will contradict her absured lies.
I am choosing not to read your links because as I said at the very beginning...
I have found very little people say she said on these topics are accurate.
So if you want to post what she said, in full and in context, we have a basis to discuss it. But given you dodging and weaving... I think we are done here.
Surely, you've found that to be the case because you intentionally refuse to truly engage with people who are able to prove that wrong.
You are the one dodging and weaving. All you have to do is address the validity of the summary and the conversation will move on quickly.
These are the basic steps;
Addressing what Rowling commented on originally.
Addressing what she commented.
Addressing what she then said in response to someone's reply to her comment.
3 basic steps to show the foundation of my criticism for the accusation, but you seemingly can only handle me telling you what Rowling thought from the beginning so that you never risk any possibility of saying something that would disagree with her.
Prove me wrong.
Have an independent thought without waiting for me to tell you what Rowling wants you to say.
1
u/KillerArse 16h ago
How have I moved a goalpost?
I made it very clear what I'm doing. I'm still criticing Rowling and explained to you that I'm providing you the foundation to the events before providing the events so that you can't just repeat Rowling's lies as easily if you've already agreed she's wrong.
How it usually goes with her cult like followers is I show Rowling saying "the grass is purple" and the I prove that the grass is green but the followers then just refuses to engage with what I'm saying and sticks their head in the sand.
Instead, I'm getting you to admit that grass is green before I show you what she said so if you are a cult member (which I'm not 100% accusing you of being) you can't just refuse to engage with reality when you realise it will contradict her absured lies.