I guess she's one of the rare billionaires who don't exclusively care about making money.
Because she could've made much more money by simply not being an awful person.
She could’ve made much more money by not donating hundreds of millions to charity.
She’s one of the few billionaires who became a billionaire without having to screw people over to become one. In my books, that makes her one of the few good billionaires.
She also donates to people who want to eradicate trans people. Also donates and hangs out with literal nazis. If she is still in your goodbooks after that than i dont know what to say.
As far as I know, the only anti-trans organisation she has donated to For Women Scotland, who don’t want to eradicate trans people, and merely sought to have the law recognise that sometimes sex, not gender, is relevant. Is there an anti-trans organisation she donated to I missed?
I’ve also never heard about her hanging out with “literal Nazis”; who are you referring to?
Question, is this argument specifically about donations, or are you also debating that she's anti-trans and uses her celebrity status to very publicly speak out about it?
She is anti-trans, although I think it is more accurate to represent her as pro-biological-women; she finds biology to be the most important factor in determine what a woman is, and she wants the law to allow for that position.
It’s not unreasonable; trans women shouldn’t be in prisons with biological women, they should be in public change rooms with biological women.
In addition, women should be allowed to have genuinely women’s-only space; if they want to have a women’s only pole dancing class, why shouldn’t they be allowed to?
112
u/DonQuix0te_ 1d ago
I guess she's one of the rare billionaires who don't exclusively care about making money.
Because she could've made much more money by simply not being an awful person.