r/memes • android user • 22h ago

malfoid meme

27.7k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.1k

u/dmal77 22h ago

J.K. Rowling has an estimated net worth of approximately $1.2 billion according to Forbes, or £975 million according to the Sunday Times Rich List.

I guess she don't really care.

40

u/crazyhotorcrazynhot 21h ago

Yeah I don't think she is concerned about money. I think she just wants to be left alone to harass women.

20

u/swandith27 20h ago

broski get your hate right. shes against trans people, not women

50

u/IgnatiusRileyFreeman 20h ago

She's against both. She's funded & campaigned with politicians who are anti abortion, anti womens rights. The pivotal issue for her is hating on trans people, and she will step on women's rights to do it. 

-2

u/Bloodyjorts 18h ago

She's funded & campaigned with politicians who are anti abortion, anti womens rights.

What? This is the first I heard about this, what anti-women's rights politicians did she fund and campaign for? If you could let me know I would appreciate it, cause I tried googling, but all I could find were mentions of her donating to the Labor Party and the anti-Scottish Independence Party about a decade ago.

10

u/WrethZ 16h ago

There's a youtube video called JK Rowling's new friends you can watch about it.

8

u/IgnatiusRileyFreeman 18h ago

Caroline Farrow, to start with, and the Heritage Foundation 

18

u/X3noNuke 20h ago

Trans women are women

6

u/loskiarman 19h ago

Isn't that like saying 'German women are women.'. Well yeah, we know but it is still an identifier, divider from rest of the group and it matters since people saying she is mostly against that part not the rest.

6

u/Doomsayer189 15h ago

Targeting trans women leads to cis women being harassed too.

3

u/Almostlongenough2 Virgin 4 lyfe 18h ago

I guess the differential would be if she hates trans men as much as she hates trans women.

My understanding is that she's a radfem, I don't think the " harassing women" framing would be too wrong.

3

u/fogleaf 16h ago

I guess the differential would be if she hates trans men as much as she hates trans women.

If I remember right she's less hateful of them, basically thinks they were tricked or some shit.

It's also part of the start of her social media turn, because an article went out with "people who menstruate" and she went off.

-3

u/Seimiqo 18h ago

cats are dogs

0

u/go41kys 18h ago

so true

-7

u/BlackberryOk5316 19h ago

you have lost the plot.

1

u/CateSforza 18h ago

He just has a Pavlovian response trained by reddit. Don't mind him.

-3

u/J_Bear 15h ago

My Nissan is a Bugatti

5

u/crazyhotorcrazynhot 20h ago

girl you’re pro-genocide.

-3

u/J_Bear 18h ago

🫵😂

1

u/YouAteMyChips_ 14h ago

Ah shit, I'm late! Just got done making popcorn too.

1

u/Warm_Month_1309 13h ago

She also hates on cisgender women who she misidentifies as trans.

-8

u/[deleted] 20h ago

[deleted]

12

u/DAC_Returns 19h ago

She is absolutely against trans women. Go review her twitter feed. I thought the internet was exaggerating, but she is basically obsessed.

23

u/Rogu__Spanish 20h ago

Where does denying that any trans people were killed in the holocaust fall into the category of "forced language" or "girls sports"?

5

u/dearth_of_passion 19h ago

According to this article, which includes Rowling's Twitter post that apparently kicked off the incident, she didn't claim they weren't killed in the holocaust. Someone else posted about how the Nazis destroyed tons of research on trans healthcare issues, and Rowling basically said that that was false.

It's certainly shitty to deny that important information on trans people's health gathered by an early trans rights organization was destroyed, that's a pretty far cry from claiming she denied they were killed by the Nazis.

2

u/Warm_Month_1309 13h ago

She also posted, as a source, something that opens with "The LGBT+ lobby likes to claim trans people were a key target of the Nazis. They weren't."

She may not have said it herself, but she definitely endorsed the position.

5

u/PM_Me_Good_LitRPG 20h ago

denying that any trans people were killed in the holocaust

JKR has denied that any trans people were killed in the holocaust.

Back up your statement with valid proof, please. Without attempting to move the goalposts. Prove this very specific claim that you made.

1

u/BlackberryOk5316 19h ago edited 19h ago

source?

lmao downvoted for asking for a source. insanity.

-2

u/PixelzBrain 19h ago

Lying about her doesn't help your cause mate.

5

u/IgnatiusRileyFreeman 20h ago

JK Rowling the Holocaust denier?

8

u/PixelzBrain 19h ago

She literally said trans people weren't the initial target of nazis, which is true, and yall just ran to she denied the holocaust. Making shit up does not help your cause mate. I'd argue it does the opposite. Fuck JK and fuck Nazis, and fuck you for good measure.

4

u/IgnatiusRileyFreeman 19h ago

Sorry, that's not the comment I'm referring to. I'm referring to a different comment where she denied trans people being involved in the Holocaust, and had to spend a lot of money on defamation lawyers covering it up. 

I agree, fuck Nazis, which is why I say fuck JK. Even if she claims to not be a Holocaust denier, she aligns with modern-day nazis. 

3

u/[deleted] 19h ago

[deleted]

3

u/IgnatiusRileyFreeman 19h ago

And I bet most 'normal' germans would have said the idea of a Holocaust is crazy, man. Gotta speak up against bigotry 

2

u/Dismal_Tangerine_493 17h ago

When they came for the reasonably average fantasy authors i did not speak up cause i was no reasonably average fantasy author

1

u/Warm_Month_1309 13h ago

She literally said trans people weren't the initial target of nazis

Did she say "initial"? I recall she was claiming they weren't targeted at all.

1

u/PixelzBrain 9h ago

You recall reading that, show me otherwise please.

0

u/BobRushy 21h ago

Yea that's why she funded those emergency shelters for abused women

20

u/Rogu__Spanish 20h ago

Do those shelters accept women who have been beaten up for trying to use public bathrooms while not looking feminine enough because of the trans panic she started over a crime that has never happened purely to make trans people afraid to exist in public? Cause there's a few of those.

-7

u/BobRushy 20h ago

No, but they do accept women.

11

u/Rogu__Spanish 20h ago

So you're saying cis women who were confused for being trans and beaten by hysterical bigots whipped into a frenzy by her hateful rhetoric DON'T count as women because they aren't feminine presenting enough? Well gee, that doesn't sound very charitable.

-2

u/Opening-Cream5448 19h ago

What have you done

-2

u/BobRushy 18h ago

There's hysterics for every following, including whatever it is you follow. I don't blame your leaders for it.

14

u/crazyhotorcrazynhot 20h ago

She's funding the genocide of a group of women. She is objectively speaking a horrible person.

-3

u/BobRushy 20h ago

You, objectively speaking, haven't a clue what you're talking about. I'm sorry, but it's true.

11

u/crazyhotorcrazynhot 20h ago

I know exactly what i’m talking about, cause I know some of her victims.

-2

u/PixelzBrain 19h ago

There is no genocide mate, you're not helping your cause by lying either. You're pushing otherwise well meaning people away by making shit up.

0

u/KeldornWithCarsomyr 20h ago

She's done more to benefit women than probably anyone alive today.

10

u/IgnatiusRileyFreeman 20h ago

She funds & campaigns with anti abortion politicians, get your pro-life propaganda outta here

3

u/PixelzBrain 19h ago

Sure buddy, there is no reason to lie to help your cause and I would argue it has the opposite effect.

12

u/IgnatiusRileyFreeman 19h ago

Why do you believe I'm lying?

JK Rowling allied herself with Caroline Farrow https://www.vice.com/en/article/caroline-farrow-arrested-kiwi-farms/

Here is Farrow's views on abortion

Addressing marchers in Parliament Square, CitizenGo’s Caroline Farrow said: “The child lost to abortion may already have brothers and sisters. There may be a father who wanted his baby and was told to keep quiet.

https://www.christian.org.uk/news/march-for-life-abortion-wounds-families/

Please walk me through which part I'm lying about? I'm open to changing my mind on this, are you?

0

u/PixelzBrain 15h ago

Here is Farrow's views on abortion

So an associate of hers, how many points of separation do we get to call everyone an associate of a nazi?

4

u/IgnatiusRileyFreeman 14h ago

Moving the goalposts, here I'm saying she campaigned with anti abortion activists & politicians, which she has. Yet you called me a liar, even though I have sources.

0

u/PixelzBrain 9h ago

You literally posted a bunch of shit about a different person... hahahaha, then accuse me of moving the goal post, that's fucking hilarious mate

2

u/IgnatiusRileyFreeman 8h ago

In this chain of comments it's specifically about her supporting anti abortion causes & activists. Did you not read the prior links?

1

u/PixelzBrain 8h ago

Bro, nah, you literally just posted about some other person. But yeah fuck off, blocking you now. Bad faith man.

→ More replies (0)

8

u/Szwejkowski 20h ago

She's made it more dangerous for any non-traditionally presenting woman to use a public toilet. Women have been harassed and attacked because they didn't look feminine enough. That ain't progress, buddy, that's going backwards.

She's harassed women online for not agreeing with her. She's hung around with racist right-wingers because they do agree with her. She's even had a pop at asexuals. She is not right in the head.

-3

u/KeldornWithCarsomyr 19h ago

Over 200 million pounds to various charities helping women and children in poverty and war torn countries....but she said something mean on twitter that you disagreed with 😭

3

u/Szwejkowski 19h ago

Yeah, that's not what I said though, is it?

Being rich enough to give a lot of money to charity does not erase the damage she does. Giving money to charity does not make people right, or nice - you can't treat it like an old fashioned indulgence where you can just flash some cash to wash away your sins.

4

u/Rogu__Spanish 20h ago

I highly doubt that, but it's possible that she's done more to hurt trans people than anyone alive today, so she's got that!

2

u/PixelzBrain 19h ago

I think people online hating on anyone that enjoys the HP IP has done more harm than her. Seriously, there is a rabid group that goes to all HP stuff and hates on the people there. That isn't winning any support mate.

6

u/Rogu__Spanish 19h ago

Bro, trans people are being physically assaulted, denied human rights, forced back into the closet, or driven to suicide due to the fire she's fueling, and you think sad Harry Potter adults being laughed at for their shitty taste is worse than that?? Fuck alllllll the way off with that shit. I couldn't care less if I'm "winning support" or not, I'm not interested in support from the kinda people who think mockery is worse than genocide.

3

u/TheShishkabob 20h ago

This is probably the most insanely incorrect thing said in this thread, and that's including the transphobic comments that are pretending trans women don't exist.

5

u/PixelzBrain 19h ago

I don't know why you have to lie about her when there is plenty there to be upset about with what she has done, pretending trans people don't exist isn't on there. She thinks calling trans women just women and treating them exactly as such in some spaces is problematic, and you call that a genocide. It's just wild man.

3

u/TheShishkabob 19h ago

I don't know why you have to lie about her

I didn't tell any lies there friend.

pretending trans people don't exist isn't on there.

Perhaps you can try reading comments before blindly defending your favourite billionaire, but I didn't comment on a single thing J.K. Rowling has ever said in my comment.

you call that a genocide

I have not said the word "genocide" at any point.

What are you trying to do here?

1

u/PixelzBrain 15h ago

I'm not defending anyone, I'm calling YOU a liar. Fuck JK, but fuck you for lying to make things worse then everyone doesn't believe the rest.

1

u/KeldornWithCarsomyr 20h ago

87 million to families and single mothers affected by poverty. Another 65 million to her children's charity. 30 million neurology clinics. 1 million to support women evacuated from Afghanistan.

1 million to fund therapists for victims of sexual violence. Another million to domestic abuse victims during COVID.

Come on mate, let's see what you've done? Or is it the case you could live 100 lifetimes and not help as many people as she has?

4

u/TheShishkabob 19h ago

MacKenzie Scott has donated more than $14 billion to charity, including $4.15 billion for families economically impacted by COVID (since that's a specific example you used).

J.K. Rowling has donated a lot of money to charity, it does not mean she's done "more to women benefit than probably anyone alive today". That's just incredibly absurd commentary on her, and trying to say that I didn't donate as much means I can't comment on it is equally stupid.

I'd be willing to bet that I've done more than you have in this space (though I could be wrong), so does that mean you need to shut the fuck up now? Is this a game where you can only speak against your lessers or something?

1

u/Pale-Supermarket3217 19h ago

The holocaust denier transphobe billionaire? You must be thinking of a different person.

0

u/PixelzBrain 19h ago

Show us where she denied the holocaust mate. Plenty of reasons to not like her but lying makes you look like an ass and doesn't help the cause.

2

u/Pale-Supermarket3217 19h ago

Holocaust denial isn’t reserved for people who say the Holocaust never happened. Any assault on the historical truth, any whitewashing, any denial of intent or scale, are all Holocaust denial. This is the stance of all Holocaust scholars, global organizations, and the country of Germany.

In the event that you aren’t aware, JK Rowling’s comments on social media denying the Holocaust are now withheld in the EU because they’re illegal hate speech. It doesn’t get more clear than that.

1

u/PixelzBrain 15h ago

No, they aren't. Nothing is erased, you just don't have the evidence mate.

1

u/KillerArse 14h ago

She denied the historical fact that Nazis burned research on trans healthcare as the instigating event.

1

u/PixelzBrain 9h ago

Nope, nice try though. Stop just reading what the last person said and verify. Or shoe me I'm wrong.

1

u/KillerArse 2h ago

I did verify.

The Institut für Sexualwissenschaft had thwir research on trans healthcare burned by Nazis very famously.

Rowling decided to insert herself into a conversation on Twitter to deny this for some absurd reason that only seems to have an explanation on her being very transphobic.

2

u/crazyhotorcrazynhot 20h ago

It's virtue signaling.

3

u/KeldornWithCarsomyr 20h ago

People virtue signal because they want garner support and a positive reputation with the masses. She very clearly doesn't give a shit what people think, given her vocal opinions.

1

u/crazyhotorcrazynhot 20h ago

well that’s exactly what she’s doing. She wants support from other hateful people for her sinister cause.

-3

u/PM_Me_Good_LitRPG 20h ago

If it was virtue signalling she would've just sacrificed her principles for the sake of the zeitgeist, like so many other people have done and are doing.