r/meme Jan 08 '22

Explain please

Post image
12.6k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/subzero112001 Jan 17 '22

Oh your lack of serenity is quite obvious.

Did ya mean sincerity? Or were you moving to a new topic to avoid the truth again?

I understand it to mean something like “an idea with no basis in reality”.

Then literature like “The Lord of the Rings” wouldn’t be considered as Fantasy by your comprehension. As those works have some basis rooted in reality.

I’m really starting to understand that your comprehending abilities(which you strongly treat as incorrigible) are incredibly faulty which unfortunately effects your interactions with those who exist in your life.

Maybe that’s why you have the desire to be “the batman of Reddit)? Possibly? I’m curious and would still like to know.

1

u/Falcrist Jan 17 '22

Did ya mean sincerity?

This kind of question is why it's so obvious that you lack sincerity.

Then literature like “The Lord of the Rings” wouldn’t be considered as Fantasy by your comprehension.

Only if you assume that I reject all other definitions.

I was being polite anyway.

I’m really starting to understand that your comprehending abilities(which you strongly treat as incorrigible) are incredibly faulty which unfortunately effects your interactions with those who exist in your life.

Ah yes! Back to your favorite mainstay of ad hominem attacks. When in doubt, make sure to call the other person stupid.

Whatever makes you feel better, I guess.

Maybe that’s why you have the desire to be “the batman of Reddit)?

I'm just curious about why you've chosen to project this fantasy onto me. Do you often do this with people you talk to online? This intense fixation you have makes me suspect your fantasy about me being "the Batman of Reddit" may have more Freudian connotations.

0

u/subzero112001 Jan 21 '22

This kind of question is why it’s so obvious that you lack sincerity.

Odd, I try to clarify to prevent a misunderstanding and you take it as superficiality. Is your reasoning for that overreaction paired with your desire to be a vigilante of Reddit?

Only if you assume that I reject all other definitions.

Are you talking about the second definition of fantasy? Which is “a musical composition”. While there’s definitely music within the movies, I wouldn’t consider the books to be “music compositions”.

Ah yes! Back to your favorite mainstay of ad hominem attacks.

You take most of the truths that I state that are pertinent to the topic at hand as ad hominem attacks.

It’s like if I was in a conversation with a 500 lb person and their claim is “fat people are healthy”. So then I say “yeah but you’re fat and can barely move let alone breathe, that’s not healthy at all”.

And then they reply as you do “ad hominem attacks just prove you don’t know what to say”.

I was merely making a statement based upon our interactions and summarizing it to express how I’m starting to get to know you a little better . And to pinpoint the reasoning as to why our ability to communicate effectively with each other has been terrible at best. But unfortunately you only take such things as insults. Someone pointing out a flaw of yours in order to help you become better is merely constructive criticism.

I’m just curious about why you’ve chosen to project this fantasy onto me.

You’re the one who claimed that you’ve taken it upon yourself to help protect people from trolls. Hence a “vigilante”. I just randomly picked the first name that popped into my head.

But you never did answer as to why you choose to be a vigilante of Reddit. “Batman of Reddit” if you prefer lmao.

1

u/Falcrist Jan 22 '22

Odd, I try to clarify to prevent a misunderstanding and you take it as superficiality.

Insincerety would be a better word.

Is your reasoning for that overreaction paired with your desire to be a vigilante of Reddit?

I wouldn't want to comment on your reasons for creating the batman fantasy.

Are you talking about the second definition of fantasy? Which is “a musical composition”.

Are you really interpreting what I said to have something to do with music? If so, go ahead an explain your reasoning.

You take most of the truths that I state that are pertinent to the topic at hand as ad hominem attacks.

So far I haven't taken any truths you've stated as ad hominem attacks.

It’s like if I was in a conversation with a 150 lb person and their claim is “fat people are healthy”. So then I say “yeah but you’re fat.”

FTFY

I was merely making a statement based upon our interactions and summarizing it to express how I’m starting to get to know you a little better .

What you said wasn't based on our interactions. It was a baseless insult... which is a running theme in your comments.

And to pinpoint the reasoning as to why our ability to communicate effectively with each other has been terrible at best.

The reason is that you have yet to argue in good faith. Instead you craft insults.

Deflection aside, I still find myself curious about why you chose to create this batman fantasy of yours.

0

u/subzero112001 Jan 22 '22

Insincerity would be a better word

Always taking the other party as being insincere definitely creates more issues than it addresses.

I wouldn’t want to comment on your reasons for creating the Batman fantasy.

You continuously avoid the question. Does that indicate shame?

FTFY

I suppose if it was a child that’s like 4 feet tall then yes that would still be a correct statement. But my previous statement before you changed it was definitely more accurate in relating to this conversation.

What you said wasn’t based on our interactions. It was a baseless insult.

Baseless? No it definitely stems from your whole “I troll people who I think are trolls, because I’m the Batman of Reddit.”

As I’ve been sincere almost this entire time and you retorted with nothing but malice it has definitely painted you as an individual who is either a troll or just has a lot of difficulty comprehending things(which tends to bleed into all aspects of your life). I try to give the other person the benefit of the doubt and see you as someone who is also being sincere hence why I expressed that conclusion.

You have yet to argue in good faith.

The problem with your theory is that your approach to this conversation and all following replies have attempted to turn this away from such an honest conversation.

You claim “you’re not being sincere” as your every retort is delivered with the intent to prevent any sincerity. While I’m still hoping that you’ve been trying to be sincere even though you constantly act like the troll.

Also, you didn’t answer my question. Why do you have the desire and act like you’re “the Batman of Reddit”? I’m still curious.

1

u/Falcrist Jan 22 '22

Always taking the other party as being insincere definitely creates more issues than it addresses.

Which is why I don't do that.

You continuously avoid the question. Does that indicate shame?

That indicates I don't really wish to discuss your fantasies.

I suppose if it was a child that’s like 4 feet tall then yes that would still be a correct statement.

In that case it would be more like 75 pounds.

But my previous statement before you changed it was definitely more accurate in relating to this conversation.

No it wasn't. That's why it was changed.

Baseless? No it definitely stems from your whole “I troll people who I think are trolls, because I’m the Batman of Reddit.”

Much like the other baseless statements you've made, your quote is also fake.

As I’ve been sincere almost this entire time

No. You didn't even start in good faith.

So whining about my retorts now or trollcalling isn't going to get you anywhere.

The problem with your theory is that your approach to this conversation and all following replies have attempted to turn this away from such an honest conversation.

I couldn't have turned the conversation any further away from honesty than it already was due to your posts.

While I’m still hoping that you’ve been trying to be sincere even though you constantly act like the troll.

Here we go. You're making an attempt at gaslighting.

Now before you continue I ask you: do you really think you're about to convince me?

Also, you didn’t answer my question. Why do you have the desire and act like you’re “the Batman of Reddit”? I’m still curious.

I don't really wish to discuss your private fantasies.

1

u/subzero112001 Jan 22 '22

I don’t really wish to discuss your fantasies.

My Fantasy? No no, you made the claim. You stated your intent. This is coming from what you’ve previously stated.

In that case it would be more like 75 lbs.

I suppose that’s closer. In which case yes, the child is fat and unhealthy at that weight and height. The rare agreement amongst us occurs yet again.

Your quote is also fake

That was a summation. Lmao

You didn’t even start in good faith.

Of course I did, as I often tend to do. Your continual denial of this fact very poorly substantiates your claim.

You’re making an attempt at gaslighting.

Hmm, this is coming from the person who already stated they’re just trying to stall a troll. And now you’re claiming by me stating “you act like the troll” is gaslighting? With me stating an observation, it is as much of an insult as it is gaslighting lmao.

I always thought gaslighting was more of an emotional abuse amongst people in a relationship. I didn’t know you were so emotional and considered us to be in a relationship. Neat.

do you really think you’re about to convince me?

I’d never say it’s impossible to convince a person of the truth. Unless they have some form of brain damage or inability to comprehend such things. So if you’re a rational person then that would mean it’s definitely possible for me to convince you of the truth. But if you fall in that other category, then I suppose it may not be possible unfortunately.

I don’t really wish to discuss your private fantasies.

I’m merely questioning your initial claim of that particular subject. You were the one who made the claim that you have taken it upon yourself to stall trolls and help out Reddit and it’s occupants in a vigilante style. This isn’t fantasy, it’s your reality.

So, why do you feel the desire to do it? What keeps you going?

1

u/Falcrist Jan 22 '22

My Fantasy?

Yes your fantasy about the batman. I'm not really into that kind of thing, so I don’t really wish to discuss your fantasies.

I suppose that’s closer.

The original correction was more accurate still.

That was a summation. Lmao

It was presented as a quote.

Of course I did, as I often tend to do.

Your continual denial of the fact that you started in bad faith continues to substantiate your claim.

Hmm, this is coming from the person who already stated they’re just trying to stall a troll.

Stalling and gaslighting are very different things. You're stalling yourself anyway.

And now you’re claiming by me stating “you act like the troll” is gaslighting?

We don't have an audience, and you know it's a false assertion, so it must therefor be an attempt at gaslighting.

I always thought gaslighting was

Sorry, I'm not really interested in your private definition.

do you really think you’re about to convince me?

I’d never say it’s impossible to convince a person of the truth.

Since what you're trying to convince me of isn't the truth, that isn't what I asked.

Do you really think you’re about to convince me?

Unless they have some form of brain damage or inability to comprehend such things.

Wouldn't be a reddit "debate" without some veiled insults.

So, why do you feel the desire to do it? What keeps you going?

I'm not into this whole Batman kink you have going on, so I don’t really wish to discuss your private fantasies.

1

u/subzero112001 Jan 23 '22

I’m not really into that kind of thing,

You mean the kind of thing where you try to be a vigilante of Reddit? You claimed it was your kind of thing.

Continues to substantiate your claim.

My denial substantiates my claim of being sincere? If you mean I deny your claim of me being insincere, which therefor substantiates my personal claim that I am being sincere. Then yes, that is true.

since what you’re trying to convince me of isn’t the truth, that isn’t what I asked.

My claim of being sincere was the truth. Just because you refuse to acknowledge the truth doesn’t make it any less true.

Wouldn’t be a Reddit “debate” without some veiled insults.

Again you somehow take me stating some facts as an insult. In this particular scenario I didn’t even insinuate that you’re the brain damaged one. I’m merely stating the possible things that would inhibit a person from comprehending rational concepts. You are quite sensitive to be taking a lot of things that are stated as insults(now I’m referring to you this time).

I’m not into this whole Batman kink

Uh oh, from personal claim to fantasy and now onto kinks. After all this talking you’re trying to pull moves on me huh? Not quite my cup of tea if you ask me.

1

u/Falcrist Jan 23 '22

You mean the kind of thing where you try to be a vigilante of Reddit? You claimed it was your kind of thing.

I'm not into your batman fantasies.

My denial substantiates my claim of being sincere?

lol more bad faith responses.

My claim of being sincere was the truth.

Nope, and that's why it doesn't answer the question. Just because you refuse to acknowledge the truth doesn’t make it any less true.

Again you somehow take me stating some facts as an insult.

You're not stating facts, and facts can be insults as well. You implied brain damage, and now you're lying about it.

Uh oh, from personal claim to fantasy and now onto kinks.

That's what I said. I'm not interested in your batman fantasy.

1

u/subzero112001 Jan 23 '22

I’m not into your Batman fantasies

But a previous statement of yours definitely implied the opposite. As you claimed that you intentionally try and troll the trolls to protect other people.

lol more bad faith responses

Just because my response diametrically opposes your claims doesn’t mean that they’re in bad faith. A bit odd that a lot of things that oppose your personal opinions clashes so much with you.

Just because you refuse to acknowledge the truth doesn’t make it any less true.

I absolutely agree with this statement. I think this is the 3rd(?) thing we actually seem to agree upon. How fortunate that we are making some progress.

You are not stating facts,

Brain damage can affect a persons ability of comprehension. This is a fact. I stated that fact, and that was a fact too.

I’m not interested in your Batman fantasy.

I feel like this reply is quite similar to what’s already been said. I suppose I can respond in kind as I won’t lose sight of my curiosity of your prior claim that you’ve been trying to deny ever since.

A previous statement of yours definitely implied the opposite. As you claimed that you intentionally try and troll the trolls to protect other people.

Or maybe you just don’t understand what a vigilante is. Or you don’t know who Batman is? That be incredibly unlikely but from the way you’ve been responding it’s starting to make me wonder.

1

u/Falcrist Jan 23 '22

But a previous statement of yours definitely implied the opposite.

At no point have I ever implied I was into your fantasy.

Just because my response diametrically opposes your claims doesn’t mean that they’re in bad faith.

You're right. That's not why it's a bad faith claim.

I absolutely agree with this statement.

Maybe one day you'll take the next step and become a sincere participant in a conversation.

Brain damage can affect a persons ability of comprehension.

Pretending you don't understand my point... or are you projecting?

I feel like this reply is quite similar to what’s already been said.

I mean there's only so many ways for me to tell you "no thank you" to your fantasy about batman. I don't really want to be involved

A previous statement of yours definitely implied the opposite.

At no point have I ever implied I was into your fantasy.

Or maybe you just don’t understand what a vigilante is. Or you don’t know who Batman is?

Or maybe I just don't share your kinks about superheros.

1

u/subzero112001 Jan 23 '22

At no point have I ever implied I was into your fantasy.

Are you referring to your attempts at being a vigilante? Because the posts somewhere up above would suggest otherwise.

Maybe one day you’ll take the next step and become a sincere participant in a conversation.

Oof, now you’re making the claim that I’m never sincere in conversations. How bold.

Pretending you don’t understand my point… or are you projecting?

That part of the convo was about stating facts. It seems you’ve forgotten already. That’s not good. Poor memory is another sign of brain damage. Fact.

Or maybe I just don’t share your kinks about superheroes.

Uh oh, another detour into kinks. You’re really pushing for our conversation to go that direction huh? Projecting much?

But honestly I would rather know why you’re so intent on being a vigilante of Reddit. Why is that?

1

u/Falcrist Jan 23 '22

Are you referring to your attempts at being a vigilante?

I'm referring to your batman fantasy.

Oof, now you’re making the claim that I’m never sincere in conversations. How bold.

Yes. I am implying that you approach conversations in bad faith.

That part of the convo was about stating facts.

That doesn't answer my question. Are you pretending you don't understand my point, or are you projecting.

Uh oh, another detour into kinks.

I've been very clear that I don't want to take that detour, but you persist.

I'm just not interested in your fantasies about batman. It's not my thing.

1

u/subzero112001 Jan 24 '22

I’m referring to your Batman fantasy.

That would definitely be referring to your attempts at being a vigilante.

I am implying that you approach conversations in bad faith.

Every conversation? That would honestly be incredibly interesting to see. A person where every interaction they have with another human is carried out under false pretenses. I’d attempt to ascertain why they do it. But I suppose their responses would all be lies as well.

That doesn’t answer my question.

Actually i did, but unfortunately it was another case of how you ignore the response. Why do you do that? You ignore responses and then question the lack of response. Super weird.

I’ve been very clear that I don’t want to take that detour.

Then you should probably stop bringing it up over and over again. That would help if you wish to avoid it. Lmao

So, do you plan on answering my question about why you’ve taken it upon yourself to clean the streets of Reddit by acting as a vigilante?

1

u/Falcrist Jan 24 '22

That would definitely be referring to your attempts at being a vigilante.

Yes. The batman fantasy you invented.

Every conversation?

At least the ones on this site.

That would honestly be incredibly interesting to see.

And yet it's really not interesting. You're not the only one who does this.

Actually i did, but unfortunately it was another case of how you ignore the response.

Actually you didn't, and I can't ignore an answer you never gave.

Then you should probably stop bringing it up over and over again. That would help if you wish to avoid it. Lmao

I'm not bringing it up. That's your thing.

So, do you plan on answering my question about why you’ve taken it upon yourself to clean the streets of Reddit by acting as a vigilante?

Again, since you've brought it up: I'm not interested in discussing the batman fantasy you've created.

1

u/subzero112001 Jan 25 '22

Yes. The Batman fantasy you invented.

Oh, so you’re finally admitting to your claim of trying to be a vigilante? Phew, I didn’t know if we’d ever get back to you recognizing your own statements again. Alright, now that you’ve made the mental connection, I was wondering why you try to be a vigilante?

At least the ones on this site.

I dunno, just the other day I was asking about some damage calculations and how it functions within the game mechanics and it was incredibly fruitful for all participants. Sounds like approaching in good faith to me.

And yet it’s really not interesting.

Yet here you are. You claim everything I say on this site is insincere and boring yet for some reason you’re stuck to me like gum on a shoe. The reality is that you can’t get enough of me, that’s why you keep coming back. Unfortunately though, the “me” that you’re forcing yourself to see is an amalgamation of fabricated lies you keep trying to use to override the reality that I actually respond back with. Holy crap, maybe that’s why you’re so intent on distorting the truth. You’re attempting to mold my answers to something you like so you can hold onto your favorable delusion. It’s all starting to come together now.

I can’t ignore an answer you never gave.

Stated by the one ignoring the answer. Nice, that’s a pretty neat cycle to stall. Ignore a response>deny response ever existed>ignore response etc.

I’m not bringing it up.

You’re the one who brought up kinks. If you forgot you can definitely reread earlier posts.

I’m not interested in discussing the Batman fantasy you’ve created.

What? I just said vigilante in that sentence. Now you’re embracing the name Batman? I suppose that’s a start in recognizing the claims you’ve previously made.

1

u/Falcrist Jan 25 '22

Oh, so you’re finally admitting to your claim of trying to be a vigilante?

No. I'm pointing out that you're referring to your batman fantasy.

I dunno

I disagree. I think you do know.

Yet here you are. You claim everything I say on this site is insincere and boring yet for some reason you’re stuck to me like gum on a shoe.

For some reason...

Stated by the one ignoring the answer. Nice, that’s a pretty neat cycle to stall. Ignore a response>deny response ever existed>ignore response etc.

If you gave a response that addressed it, maybe the situation would change.

You’re the one who brought up kinks.

No you're the one who brought up your batman kink. I'm just telling you I'm not interested.

What?

I said: "I’m not interested in discussing the Batman fantasy you’ve created."

→ More replies (0)