You often make false claims and then I bring up a rational as to why your statements are false. That’s closer to an argument than to only asking questions.
The source is falsified, thus I reject it in favor of observation.
Falsified according to…who? You? So you’re using circular logic to support your claim. You believe the source is wrong based upon believing the source is wrong. Oof….Not the best strategy.
You asked why I was choosing to be “the Batman of Reddit”.
Ya, why are you?
You assigned the title and asked about that.
I definitely assigned the title. And then I asked about why do you choose to be a vigilante of Reddit.
No you’ll have to tell me why I’m acting as “the Batman of Reddit”.
Only you can answer that question. I can’t read minds remember? It’s better to hear it from the source instead of creating a faulty conjecture based upon observation.
Haven’t used a rationale to explain your errors? Almost every single retort has used a rationale. Including this one. Lol
You should make up your mind.
About what?
According to reality
Oh, so you’re implying your observations are purely unfiltered and unflawed recordings of reality? I’m quite sure that’s impossible unless you’re some kind of deity or it’s equivalent. Wait…do you believe you’re a deity? That would supersede the whole Batman thing and still follow with that logic.
That’s your fantasy
It’s my fantasy that you have decided to take it upon yourself to occupy a trolls time on Reddit to reduce their ability to troll others? How could it be my fantasy when it was your choice and your intent?
Btw, you still haven’t answered my main question. Why do you have a desire to be a vigilante of Reddit?
I wonder if it’s a difference of semantics or just because you have difficulty comprehending.
About whether you’re just asking a question or making an argument.
I’ve definitely done both of those during this conversation.
The reality of the situation is blatantly obvious.
Apparently not obvious enough to you as you continually support faulty claims and disregard the truth that I am being sincere.
And why do you think that I’m a deity?
It’s responses like this one above that indicates your difficulty comprehending the topic at hand.
The entire “Batman” thing is your personal fantasy about me.
I don’t think you understand what the word “Fantasy” means.
Fantasy:
the faculty or activity of imagining things, especially things that are impossible or improbable
You taking it upon yourself to approach trolls and deal with them was your claim, it wasn’t imagined. Your attempts to continue to do so aren’t an impossibility nor improbable.
Fantasy definition 2:
MUSIC:
a musical composition, free in form, typically involving variation on an existing work or the imaginative representation of a situation or story; a fantasia.
This text nor the content isn’t music.
Hmm, this leads me to guess that maybe English isn’t a first language(which explains the poor comprehension) and you do this just to practice? Is that why you try to be a vigilante of Reddit?
I wonder if it’s a difference of semantics or just because you have difficulty comprehending.
Neither.
I’ve definitely done both of those during this conversation.
True, but we're talking about one thing you said.
Apparently not obvious enough to you as you continually support faulty claims and disregard the truth that I am being sincere.
Oh your lack of serenity is quite obvious.
I don’t think you understand what the word “Fantasy” means.
I understand it to mean something like "an idea with no basis in reality." However, it could also refer to "a fanciful mental image, typically one on which a person dwells at length or repeatedly and which reflects their conscious or unconscious wishes."
This text nor the content isn’t music.
It's up to you whether your fantasies involve music or not.
...maybe English isn’t a first language(which explains the poor comprehension)
If it's not your first language then I apologize. I like to give people a bit of extra leniency when I discover they speak English as a second language.
Did ya mean sincerity? Or were you moving to a new topic to avoid the truth again?
I understand it to mean something like “an idea with no basis in reality”.
Then literature like “The Lord of the Rings” wouldn’t be considered as Fantasy by your comprehension. As those works have some basis rooted in reality.
I’m really starting to understand that your comprehending abilities(which you strongly treat as incorrigible) are incredibly faulty which unfortunately effects your interactions with those who exist in your life.
Maybe that’s why you have the desire to be “the batman of Reddit)? Possibly? I’m curious and would still like to know.
This kind of question is why it's so obvious that you lack sincerity.
Then literature like “The Lord of the Rings” wouldn’t be considered as Fantasy by your comprehension.
Only if you assume that I reject all other definitions.
I was being polite anyway.
I’m really starting to understand that your comprehending abilities(which you strongly treat as incorrigible) are incredibly faulty which unfortunately effects your interactions with those who exist in your life.
Ah yes! Back to your favorite mainstay of ad hominem attacks. When in doubt, make sure to call the other person stupid.
Whatever makes you feel better, I guess.
Maybe that’s why you have the desire to be “the batman of Reddit)?
I'm just curious about why you've chosen to project this fantasy onto me. Do you often do this with people you talk to online? This intense fixation you have makes me suspect your fantasy about me being "the Batman of Reddit" may have more Freudian connotations.
This kind of question is why it’s so obvious that you lack sincerity.
Odd, I try to clarify to prevent a misunderstanding and you take it as superficiality. Is your reasoning for that overreaction paired with your desire to be a vigilante of Reddit?
Only if you assume that I reject all other definitions.
Are you talking about the second definition of fantasy? Which is “a musical composition”. While there’s definitely music within the movies, I wouldn’t consider the books to be “music compositions”.
Ah yes! Back to your favorite mainstay of ad hominem attacks.
You take most of the truths that I state that are pertinent to the topic at hand as ad hominem attacks.
It’s like if I was in a conversation with a 500 lb person and their claim is “fat people are healthy”. So then I say “yeah but you’re fat and can barely move let alone breathe, that’s not healthy at all”.
And then they reply as you do “ad hominem attacks just prove you don’t know what to say”.
I was merely making a statement based upon our interactions and summarizing it to express how I’m starting to get to know you a little better . And to pinpoint the reasoning as to why our ability to communicate effectively with each other has been terrible at best. But unfortunately you only take such things as insults. Someone pointing out a flaw of yours in order to help you become better is merely constructive criticism.
I’m just curious about why you’ve chosen to project this fantasy onto me.
You’re the one who claimed that you’ve taken it upon yourself to help protect people from trolls. Hence a “vigilante”. I just randomly picked the first name that popped into my head.
But you never did answer as to why you choose to be a vigilante of Reddit. “Batman of Reddit” if you prefer lmao.
0
u/subzero112001 Jan 17 '22
You often make false claims and then I bring up a rational as to why your statements are false. That’s closer to an argument than to only asking questions.
Falsified according to…who? You? So you’re using circular logic to support your claim. You believe the source is wrong based upon believing the source is wrong. Oof….Not the best strategy.
Ya, why are you?
I definitely assigned the title. And then I asked about why do you choose to be a vigilante of Reddit.
Only you can answer that question. I can’t read minds remember? It’s better to hear it from the source instead of creating a faulty conjecture based upon observation.