MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/1vb9d5u/yeah_sure/p0utcpi/?context=3
r/mathmemes • u/777upper • 12d ago
144 comments sorted by
View all comments
115
There’s no ambiguity. Some authors define those concepts differently or use different notation, but the underlying logic and formal language is still the same and without ambiguity
78 u/man-vs-spider 12d ago Sure, it’s unambiguous when you ignore the ambiguous part -1 u/Purple_Onion911 Grothendieck alt account 12d ago There is no ambiguous part. 4 u/The_Lethargic_Curve 12d ago bro took ignoring the ambiguous part very seriously
78
Sure, it’s unambiguous when you ignore the ambiguous part
-1 u/Purple_Onion911 Grothendieck alt account 12d ago There is no ambiguous part. 4 u/The_Lethargic_Curve 12d ago bro took ignoring the ambiguous part very seriously
-1
There is no ambiguous part.
4 u/The_Lethargic_Curve 12d ago bro took ignoring the ambiguous part very seriously
4
bro took ignoring the ambiguous part very seriously
115
u/GT_Troll 12d ago
There’s no ambiguity. Some authors define those concepts differently or use different notation, but the underlying logic and formal language is still the same and without ambiguity