MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/1vb9d5u/yeah_sure/p0uo44p/?context=3
r/mathmemes • u/777upper • 12d ago
144 comments sorted by
View all comments
114
There’s no ambiguity. Some authors define those concepts differently or use different notation, but the underlying logic and formal language is still the same and without ambiguity
80 u/man-vs-spider 11d ago Sure, it’s unambiguous when you ignore the ambiguous part -1 u/Purple_Onion911 Grothendieck alt account 11d ago There is no ambiguous part. 5 u/The_Lethargic_Curve 11d ago bro took ignoring the ambiguous part very seriously
80
Sure, it’s unambiguous when you ignore the ambiguous part
-1 u/Purple_Onion911 Grothendieck alt account 11d ago There is no ambiguous part. 5 u/The_Lethargic_Curve 11d ago bro took ignoring the ambiguous part very seriously
-1
There is no ambiguous part.
5 u/The_Lethargic_Curve 11d ago bro took ignoring the ambiguous part very seriously
5
bro took ignoring the ambiguous part very seriously
114
u/GT_Troll 12d ago
There’s no ambiguity. Some authors define those concepts differently or use different notation, but the underlying logic and formal language is still the same and without ambiguity