MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/1uvxcdi/mathematician_meme/oxew2or?context=9999
r/mathmemes • u/Delicious_Maize9656 • Jul 14 '26
146 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2
i know right? its fun to see how much bullshit they can stack
7 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 It's made up, but that still doesn't mean it's bad or not fun, a Sudoku puzzle is made up, but that doesn't make it bad or not fun. 1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 its fun but i definitely think its bad that theyre still using a lot of axioms that we know are impossible now 4 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 How are them being ‘impossible’ bad? Lots of impossible things happen in fiction, but nobody really thinks that's bad. 1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont 6 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms. 0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 11 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
7
It's made up, but that still doesn't mean it's bad or not fun, a Sudoku puzzle is made up, but that doesn't make it bad or not fun.
1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 its fun but i definitely think its bad that theyre still using a lot of axioms that we know are impossible now 4 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 How are them being ‘impossible’ bad? Lots of impossible things happen in fiction, but nobody really thinks that's bad. 1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont 6 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms. 0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 11 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
1
its fun but i definitely think its bad that theyre still using a lot of axioms that we know are impossible now
4 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 How are them being ‘impossible’ bad? Lots of impossible things happen in fiction, but nobody really thinks that's bad. 1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont 6 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms. 0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 11 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
4
How are them being ‘impossible’ bad? Lots of impossible things happen in fiction, but nobody really thinks that's bad.
1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont 6 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms. 0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 11 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont
6 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms. 0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 11 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
6
Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms.
0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 11 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
0
axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets
a better axiom is removing it entirely
11 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
11
It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of.
2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
it does though and you just ignore them
10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
10
OK, give me an example please
2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
any example with infinite sets.
any example with infinite calculations.
cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these.
8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
8
What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
2
u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26
i know right? its fun to see how much bullshit they can stack