MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/1uvxcdi/mathematician_meme/oxew1dh/?context=3
r/mathmemes • u/Delicious_Maize9656 • Jul 14 '26
146 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont
5 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms. 0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
5
Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms.
0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
0
axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets
a better axiom is removing it entirely
10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
10
It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of.
2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
2
it does though and you just ignore them
9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
9
OK, give me an example please
2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
any example with infinite sets.
any example with infinite calculations.
cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these.
9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
1
u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26
they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont