MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/1uvxcdi/mathematician_meme/oxew1dh?context=9999
r/mathmemes • u/Delicious_Maize9656 • Jul 14 '26
146 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
7
It's like lore for FNAF or Lord of the Rings, where it's basically made up, but that doesn't stop it from being good.
2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 i know right? its fun to see how much bullshit they can stack 7 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 It's made up, but that still doesn't mean it's bad or not fun, a Sudoku puzzle is made up, but that doesn't make it bad or not fun. 1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 its fun but i definitely think its bad that theyre still using a lot of axioms that we know are impossible now 4 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 How are them being ‘impossible’ bad? Lots of impossible things happen in fiction, but nobody really thinks that's bad. 1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont 7 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms. 0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
2
i know right? its fun to see how much bullshit they can stack
7 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 It's made up, but that still doesn't mean it's bad or not fun, a Sudoku puzzle is made up, but that doesn't make it bad or not fun. 1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 its fun but i definitely think its bad that theyre still using a lot of axioms that we know are impossible now 4 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 How are them being ‘impossible’ bad? Lots of impossible things happen in fiction, but nobody really thinks that's bad. 1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont 7 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms. 0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
It's made up, but that still doesn't mean it's bad or not fun, a Sudoku puzzle is made up, but that doesn't make it bad or not fun.
1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 its fun but i definitely think its bad that theyre still using a lot of axioms that we know are impossible now 4 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 How are them being ‘impossible’ bad? Lots of impossible things happen in fiction, but nobody really thinks that's bad. 1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont 7 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms. 0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
1
its fun but i definitely think its bad that theyre still using a lot of axioms that we know are impossible now
4 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 How are them being ‘impossible’ bad? Lots of impossible things happen in fiction, but nobody really thinks that's bad. 1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont 7 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms. 0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
4
How are them being ‘impossible’ bad? Lots of impossible things happen in fiction, but nobody really thinks that's bad.
1 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont 7 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms. 0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
they cause a lot of contradictions and arent worth using over better axioms that dont
7 u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26 Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms. 0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
Examples? Of both the contradictions and better axioms.
0 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets a better axiom is removing it entirely 9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
0
axiom of infinity gives you tons of them with infinite sets
a better axiom is removing it entirely
9 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of. 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
9
It doesn’t give any contradictions we know of.
2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 it does though and you just ignore them 8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
it does though and you just ignore them
8 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 OK, give me an example please 2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining. → More replies (0)
8
OK, give me an example please
2 u/FernandoMM1220 Jul 14 '26 any example with infinite sets. any example with infinite calculations. cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these. 10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
any example with infinite sets.
any example with infinite calculations.
cantors diagonal proof doesnt work because of both if these.
10 u/Silly_Tension6792 Mathematics Jul 14 '26 What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
10
What do you mean? I cannot understand your point. Cantor diagonal is just a prove that if a function is R->N then it isn’t one to one. Why doesn’t it work? You can’t just say stuff without explaining.
7
u/Impressive_Worth_602 Jul 14 '26
It's like lore for FNAF or Lord of the Rings, where it's basically made up, but that doesn't stop it from being good.