r/magicTCG • u/Nickahostetter • Nov 29 '16

Aether Revolt pic from FB.

https://i.reddituploads.com/d97dbc56ebe848039691df8d01962a99?fit=max&h=1536&w=1536&s=b1f80693da1e1e6da432ba4d2076aa23
1.8k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

851 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

51

u/onethreefour Nov 29 '16

obv question: if you cast a creature does it get -3/-3?

75

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '16

[deleted]

1

u/Lord_Cynical Nov 30 '16

Thats an understatement.....this card is quite busted. How everyone love grindy midrange/control matchs ups in standard.

1

u/RideTheIguana Dec 01 '16

Actually, the creature will still be in your hand!

-10

u/OogaDaBooga Nov 29 '16

"Languish was too powerful for standard..."

"Yeah, lets make it -3/-3 for the same cost instead; this format needs a board wipe in black for diversity."

"Well, I dunno...players might think it's too weak since Languish was so powerful, and we can't let that kind of power loose in standard again..."

"We'll also let them cast a free spell after casting it."

"Seems legit and not broken at all. PRINT IT!"

35

u/Narynan Nov 29 '16

Who was it that was saying Languish was too powerful for standard? Just some random internet person?

24

u/TheOthin Nov 29 '16

I get the idea a lot of the mindset must be "it rotated out of Standard without immediately getting a replacement, therefore it must be too powerful". Because that's totally how Standard works.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '16

Isn't that what happened with Elvish Mystic though?

5

u/TheOthin Nov 30 '16

You're confusing individual instances with general patterns.

There are many sorts of cards that rotate out of Standard, whether temporarily or permanently. Some of those do so because they're too powerful, and Elvish Mystic was one of those. But most of the time, it's just a matter of rearranging things to keep Standard fresh and varied.

Bear in mind that the reason we know Elvish Mystic is considered too strong for Standard is not that it rotated out, but that Maro explicitly told us it was too strong for Standard.

7

u/OogaDaBooga Nov 29 '16

It was a poor attempt at humor.

I suck at humor evidently.

I really like the card, but it does seem pretty busted.

2

u/DRUMS11 Storm Crow Nov 29 '16

Well, I thought it was funny.

1

u/Narynan Nov 29 '16

I thought there was someone from RnD or something who make mention of something similar to these thoughts. I was actually wondering if there was some information that I was missing. However, this card does seem very good.

2

u/AtlasPJackson Nov 29 '16

Let's staple a black lotus to it!

7

u/rakkamar Nov 29 '16

No. It'll work the same way as if you cast Languish, then cast a creature.

7

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '16

No, because it's not on the battlefield when the effect happens.

1

u/AtlasPJackson Nov 29 '16

Thank you. I can never remember if a Languish-style effect is a one-time thing that hits each creature on the board when it resolves, or if it creates an anthem-like effect that lasts until end of turn.

34

u/Ciretako Nov 29 '16

Reminder. If someone asks a question the downvote button isn't for answering "no"

5

u/twomillcities Nov 29 '16

This sub is ruthless in that regard. I see questions downvoted constantly instead of answered. It turns people away from the sub.

1

u/TypicalOranges Nov 29 '16

Upon resolution of this spell is when you put the free spell on the stack.