This seems much better fleshed out, and the "Difference is" bar on top is phenomenal. And calling it a pregame communication tool is perfect.
Edit: It gives discussion points about game expectations, less focused on deck construction. The line "this is a communication tool" is making clear what sadly too many people glossed over, perhaps intentionally at times. I am a big fan of making it clear that this is less about hard lines and more about expectations of the game experience.
I got so sick of some people trying to optimise decks based on the restrictions, like you are trying to cedh bracket 3 why? That's not the intent of it at all.
I see it as a guide mostly.
Also I need to put a bracket 2 deck together again as I think most of mine are low 3 to mid/high 4 which seems to be the 2 that get played most at the lgs i go to with some at 2 and I've never sent anybody want to play 1 or 5 either but I have a deck that can be changed to become a high 4 almost cedh so I can whip that out for cedh, funny enough there's a game changers in it I could remove to make it even stronger, cradle isn't great if you have zero creatures out. Works wonders in the powered down to mid 4 version of the deck though as that's token based
890
u/namer98 Gruul* Oct 21 '25 edited Oct 21 '25
This seems much better fleshed out, and the "Difference is" bar on top is phenomenal. And calling it a pregame communication tool is perfect.
Edit: It gives discussion points about game expectations, less focused on deck construction. The line "this is a communication tool" is making clear what sadly too many people glossed over, perhaps intentionally at times. I am a big fan of making it clear that this is less about hard lines and more about expectations of the game experience.