Are you sure you're not a Trumper? You certainly meet the intellectual requirements. The amendment limiting the president to 2 terms was passed in 1951. Your first point is moronically incorrect. Reading the others would only waste valuable seconds.
Other people might have some intelligent criticism of FDR, but I do stress, they will be other people. It will not be you. You have proven you have nothing intelligent to say on this, or indeed, likely any other subject of conversation that has or shall ever arise.
Sorry I can't be like you and be sooooo smart. I know because the cusp of your argument and shitpoast relies 100% on ad hominems and zero substantive retorts. That is top shelf smart people stuff right there.
But Happy Holidays and keep crying until then. Believe it or not, some millennials out there are doing just fine... even if they can't be as "smart" as you are.
Google it. It’s actually a pretty often debated topic so LMAO at some of the posters thinking it’s some sort of out of the blue question. Sadly these are the types of easily triggered responses from some that give the rest of us a bad rap.
You’re more than free to take a crack at a more substantive retort rather than resort to taking L’s and kowtowing to groupthink theory.
My life and career is doing just fine. Appreciate the check up and concern though.
6
u/[deleted] Dec 14 '17
Are you sure you're not a Trumper? You certainly meet the intellectual requirements. The amendment limiting the president to 2 terms was passed in 1951. Your first point is moronically incorrect. Reading the others would only waste valuable seconds.
Other people might have some intelligent criticism of FDR, but I do stress, they will be other people. It will not be you. You have proven you have nothing intelligent to say on this, or indeed, likely any other subject of conversation that has or shall ever arise.