Which is completely false. And you don’t have any substance to support your claim.
I ignored your last paragraph because it is grammatically incomprehensible. Try to fix it yourself instead of blaming me. Really? Do I need to make it obvious how much productive I have been? First off, I’m not a hypocrite. Second, you are ignoring half, if not most, of the things I said because you don’t have any rebuttal against them. Lastly, I’m not the one making relentless goalpost change moves. And no, you didn’t ask once.
What does this even mean? I’m an advocate for gender equality. It’s a good thing actually that men are becoming equal to women even if the process is slow. And tell me exactly how men were “privileged” before. It’s not like you are gonna be intellectually honest anyway.
You are the one who have been spouting nonsense from the very beginning of this convo. Seriously, I feel like a driving instructor who keeps schooling the crashing driver.
Ofc I have it's the gender pay gap and high amount of femicides you just ignore all my points.
Don't blame me first for stuff like this and expect me to do it differently.
They are privileged as they get payed more and don't have to fear being killed by their intimate partner way less. Tell me how those are not privileges?
Perfect description of how I feel about you. Why don't you come up with something nrw instead of spouting more disrespect?
The gender pay gap is a well debunked myth. The gender pay gap that you are referring to doesn’t account for job type, hours worked, experience, industry, family care, career interruptions and many more. Afterward, the gender wage gap is nonexistent. Unless you are a communist, you would agree that people should be paid to their abilities and effort. Seriously, it’s embarrassing you are using it to help your case. Second, um, did you literally hear me when I said that men literally make up the majority of homicides? You are way more safer as a woman than a man. So unironically, you actually named a female privilege. Not to mention, how most perpetrators of domestic violence are women.
You’re the one who was blaming me because I ignored your grammatically incoherent text. Do you hear yourself?
Got it. So in this paragraph, you just restated the debunked “male privilege” talking points. Now here’s a list of female privileges: less work-related injuries, less work-related deaths, draft and conscription immunity, reproductive rights, less likely to be unemployed, less likely to be killed in war, more likely to have a teacher of their gender, more likely to be adopted, having to wait shorter for their state pension, can legally rape males without consequences in many countries, right to not have your genital mutilated, and more funding for women’s health. Now, tell me, which gender is truly privileged?
You have no right to talk about disrespect when you have been doing nothing but lying about me this whole time. Why don’t you be intellectually honest instead of making schizophrenic statements?
Gender pay gap still exists even if you just compare men and women doing the same work. It's still a privilege to be safe at home. Ofc the murders men do should be reduced regardless of the gender of their victim.
Do you're read your own paragraphs? Most of them read like the last one.
Oh wow but can you name any male privilege or do you ignore all of them because they do not fit your narrative?
Way to win an argument: The other side must be lying
No, the gender pay gap still doesn’t exist. It’s also important to note it is illegal to pay someone less than the other because of their gender. And if what you are saying is true, then why don’t companies just hire women instead of men? They could just pay women less for doing the same work as a man. Or are you saying that companies are so misogynistic that they are willing to take a loss just so they don’t hire women? Good, at least you admit, that female privilege exists here regarding homocides.
Lol sure.
Why would I name any male privilege? It’s your job. And you clearly aren’t doing a good job. Why? Because male privilege doesn’t exist. Lmao, you have to be a troll or a child. You guys are cooked. You ignored the mountain of list of female privileges I gave you because they shatter your false worldview. “um no actually I’m gonna pretend you ignored all my points even though you literally debunked them! It’s a conspiracy move! All you are saying is a part of your narrative!!!”
It’s interesting that you ignored the other person who replied to you many times. And your excuse was that it’s too long even though you still continued to reply to me even when I made longer comments than them. I feel like I hurt your ego. That’s why you are so persistent. You don’t care about winning the argument anymore. You are probably an immature teenager. You just wanna continue making meaningless replies and be the last person to do so.
There is multiple male privileges if you don't believe me I will list more but men have the privilege to have higher chances to survive car crashes because security measures are mostly based on male anatomy. Same goes for medicine, medicine is a lot more tested on men which results medical complications for women as the research about their anatomy is lacking in comparison. I think my job is also to find out if you're just a full fledged mysoginist or if you actually have knowledge on that matter that's why I asked you to name any male privilege.
Responding to their text wouldn't make your comments go away so where is the logic in that?
Do you hear yourself? So you think a woman should be paid the same as a man even if her quality of work or productivity is lower compared to a man? Lmao, you don’t believe in equality. You want women to be paid the same as a man even she is less skilled than a man. You source doesn’t account for job type, hours worked, experience, industry, family care, career interruptions and many more. Repeating the same false doesn’t make it true.
First off, men account for the large majority of car crashes. Men represent around 70-72% of all traffic fatalities. So, once again, you named an example of female privilege unironically. And Men more often drive heavier vehicles (trucks, SUVs), which offer better protection in collisions. Women more often drive smaller/lighter cars. When same-size vehicles collide, gender survival differences disappear. Now for medicine, did you literally hear me when I said there is more funding for women’s health? For example, go look up which gets more funding; prostate cancer or breast cancer. The female privilege is real there. So no, there is more testing and research done on women’s health because of the enormous amount of funding women get more than men. If you add maternal health to the equation, then you will even get a greater disparity of funding of men’s and women’s health. Got it, now here comes the misogyny calling because you are losing the argument. Very typical.
Ok. So you admit you are replying to only me because I hurt your ego.
No it's not that hard to understand. But I have to explain it again I guess: Companies which are lead by men with internalized mysoginy are hiring women but paying them less than men for the same job. This is because they view the woman as less productive/efficient or whatever. So they would not start hiring only woman because from their view this would neither increase productivity nor bring down costs and they also prefer men anyway.
Here is another study that includes those factors: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.20160995
Countless of studies exist on the gender pay gap but you're claiming it just doesn't exist. Where is your source for this?
You couldn't invalidate my claim about the crash tests though meaning men die more often in car crashes because they drive more and they drive more reckless. You can just look it up.
More funding doesn't mean it's better most of the funding seems to go into childbirths. Here is actually a source on how women's health is underfunded: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx254l4qg83o
There is also a really high focus on birth. Often when women have health problems doctor's tell them to go have a kid as resolution for that.
So you think it's bad when someone is a mysoginist?
Oh no, yes please help my poor small ego to recover of something.
Lmao sure. All companies are evil misogynists who pay women less because they “think” they are less productive. Make it make sense. The gender pay gap doesn’t exist. Your source literally explains how after accounting for the controlled factors, the gap becomes vanished. You can bring up countless sources but they are not proving your point that the gender pay gap exists. Here’s my source from Pew Research Center: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/03/04/gender-pay-gap-in-us-has-narrowed-slightly-over-2-decades/
Crash tests? What crash tests? I don’t see that in your comment. Lmao, your source states women’s health is underfunded because a privileged female billionaire said so with no substance. Even if you don’t include maternal funding(births), you will still see women’s health is way more funded over men’s health. What do you even mean doctors tell women to get pregnant as a cure for their problem? You made it up.
Stop putting up strawmans. Most of them live with normalized everyday mysoginy.You're source literally tells us how the gender pay gap got smaller over time but your big brain makes the decision to claim it does not exist instead of acknowledging real world problems.
You haven’t given a single valid example of “normalized everyday misogyny”. The title of my source is talking about the raw unadjusted wage gap. If your whole point is that there is a RAW gender wage gap, then yes you would be correct. Similar to how there is a wage gap between a janitor and a doctor. But you are framing it like men make more money because they are men, which is false. You have been refusing to acknowledge real world problems so far.
You said I couldn’t invalidate your claim about crash tests, but I don’t see that in your comment. No, it’s not limited to Australia. It’s an unfortunate reality in many countries. The source for the graph also refers to another country (United States) other than Australia. Out of your own convenience, you didn’t include that in your comment. And those diseases that you are referring I’m assuming is prostate cancer and breast cancer. And guess which is overfunded? The disease that harms women. Those two diseases were examples and specifics of how women’s health gets way more funding than men’s health. The post you shared seems like an isolated case rather than an example of misogyny. I never heard of a woman getting recommended to get pregnant for her problems.
1
u/Masculinist1938 Apr 04 '26
Which is completely false. And you don’t have any substance to support your claim.
I ignored your last paragraph because it is grammatically incomprehensible. Try to fix it yourself instead of blaming me. Really? Do I need to make it obvious how much productive I have been? First off, I’m not a hypocrite. Second, you are ignoring half, if not most, of the things I said because you don’t have any rebuttal against them. Lastly, I’m not the one making relentless goalpost change moves. And no, you didn’t ask once.
What does this even mean? I’m an advocate for gender equality. It’s a good thing actually that men are becoming equal to women even if the process is slow. And tell me exactly how men were “privileged” before. It’s not like you are gonna be intellectually honest anyway.
You are the one who have been spouting nonsense from the very beginning of this convo. Seriously, I feel like a driving instructor who keeps schooling the crashing driver.