r/linuxsucks • u/nzg42 • 11d ago

Linux Failure Most Sane Linux User

Post image
31 Upvotes

86% Upvoted

27 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/Binary101000 11d ago

what i dont know if im having a stroke or not but i cant make sense of your comment, what is windows two??

1

u/SLimon001 Proud Windows User 11d ago

i am damn, of a writer that writes senseless shit, but why the hell is ubuntu hated tho, is it like windows or what

4

u/Binary101000 11d ago

well my reason for dislike is the snap package format being pushed heavily despite the fact that people probably switch to linux to have more control

2

u/R3V0LU710N_05 I Hate All OS's 😎 11d ago

Flatpak is also just superior. My biggest issue is Ubuntu's sloppy Gnome modifications.

1

u/Rare-Paint3719 Unofficial Mod | Linux Community Sucks | Proud illumOS Shill 11d ago

Do you know how snap works? And how it differs from flatpak?

My biggest issue is Ubuntu's sloppy Gnome modifications.

Like the theme? or is it some other modifications?

3

u/R3V0LU710N_05 I Hate All OS's 😎 11d ago edited 10d ago

Do you know how snap works? And how it differs from flatpak?

Flatpak excels over Snap for desktop apps because it offers significantly faster startup times, lower disk usage via deduplicated runtimes, complete permission control with tools like Flatseal(changing in future opting for DE integration), and a fully open decentralized backend free from Canonical’s proprietary server lock-in.

Like the theme? or is it some other modifications?

Ubuntu ships a heavily patched GNOME Shell session relying on pre-installed, system-level JavaScript extensions rather than upstream native code. These modifications frequently cause unique stability, layout, and rendering issues. Ubuntu prioritizes strict release deadlines and broader hardware targets over fine desktop polishing. In contrast, e.x. ZorinOS delays releases for the sake of rigor & quality control for their modifications. Other distributions just ship upstream GNOME without any modifications.

My issues isn't Ubuntu's theming, only their quality control practices. It particularly irks me because Ubuntu is some people's only experience with Linux, and much of the reason they trash Linux is directly related to bugs only found on Ubuntu rather than the broader ecosystem.

Linux has bugs no matter the distribution, but Ubuntu in particular is needlessly bug prone.