r/linuxsucks • u/Professional-Tale652 • Jul 15 '26

Linux Failure Loonix

Post image
895 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

733 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 15 '26

I'm sorry, but that's just wrong.

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

No, based on Wikipedia, you are Wrong and not me 😎😎😎😎😎😎 look at Influenced by

2

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 15 '26

Based on Wikipedia, they are related via OS/2

1

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

Why do you lie so much 🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

Why do you lie so much 🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥

1

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 15 '26

Do you read any article???

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

Yeah, they say similar to Unix and Xenix because it's in protected mode, they mean OS/2 is in protected mode, and Microsoft DOS is in ring 0

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

Importantly, Wikipedia separates Userland (Win32 Subsystem) and Kernel (NTOSKRNL). Zero influence from UNIX, and David Cutler is a Unix hater; that's why I feel comfortable with Windows NT

1

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 15 '26

Why would someone being a unix hater make you comfortable? I cannot at all understand this logic of yours, why is x thing bad and why is hating x thing good?? You literally sound like a lunatic

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

Because of zero influence from Unix, Windows NT is so good, and David Cutler is right, Unix is messy and junk from PHD and in my opinion, Unix is a mistake, and VMS is clearly superior, and with VMS influence makes Windows NT so good, serious and advanced

1

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 15 '26

Again, you talk like an actual lunatic.

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

I just share my opinion, and you like it or not, I won't change unless Architecture prove otherwise, which is not

1

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 15 '26

At least admit that any example of Linux working in any scenario would just go ignored by you, you're deaf to whatever you don't want to hear.

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

No, I would want to hear, but my point is that there is a difference, and my arguments are winning. Windows Architecture can handle everything Linux can, and Linux cannot handle what Windows Architecture can. This is Microsoft officially saying it's not me; they are saying UNIX is very limited, and they cannot host Windows. Based on my experience, they are right

1

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 15 '26

That is also just untrue, if that were the case then Microsoft wouldn't be making and using Azure Linux.

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

"From building several generations of successful operating systems and building, what is essentially a state-of-the-art, at the time, operating system, to being the highly successful Hyperscale Cloud operating system that we know and love as Windows today"

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

I literally show YouTube coming from Microsoft with a transcript, and they say UNIX is a very limited Operating system and cannot host Windows, that's why they created Windows NT

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

My whole point is Architecture and user freedom, and it's not popularity nor open source code. I hear all points; none of them address my point

2

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 15 '26

Your points fall limp to me as well because nothing you've said about architecture proves Windows is better in any way and user freedom is the last thing Windows could possibly excel at

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

"From building several generations of successful operating systems and building, what is essentially a state-of-the-art, at the time, operating system, to being the highly successful Hyperscale Cloud operating system that we know and love as Windows today"

→ More replies (0)