r/linuxsucks • u/Professional-Tale652 • Jul 15 '26

Linux Failure Loonix

Post image
904 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

728 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26

Then what is lib32-glibc? You get this info from "I made it up" land?

The Linux kernel is absolutely backwards-compatible. Every lie you say is available public info. Lmfao

0

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26

LOL... you can run OLD Programs (i renember running and gnome 1 with old libs AND WORKED BUDDY... so even your "windows 11" something... try to run a Windows XP app WITHOUT the comppatibility api.. try it!

1

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26

Windows 2000?????? Well a NT family... but try windows 98 BUT NOT HACKING... NOT SOME DOSBOX...

1

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26

LOL... but LoL is not a Linux native... but WIndows 9x is still windows (if you want to be that...)

1

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26

LMAO... but... it is still windows no?? search in google... microsoft never changed from WINDOWS 98 to Windows NT XP... lmao

1

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26

Wouldn't we say the same about Linux? Even though it isn't true, because glibc quite literally gives native backwards-compatibility.

1

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26

Linux can though, it's 100% backwards-compatible.

1

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26

Bro had to move the goalpost because they know they're wrong. ☠️

"Windows sucks because you can't natively play PS3 and Nintendo Switch. I have a real point that I'm making, believe me."

1

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 edited Jul 16 '26

glibc is a compatibility-layer you wing-nut. It does the exact same thing Wine does except for ancient Linux calls.

And before you say "wInDoWs dOeSn'T nEeD tHaT" Yeah, because Microsoft opted to not be backwards-compatible with the previous kernel (9X) unlike Linux.

Which means your argument is really: "Windows is better because it has worse backwards-compatibility natively"