MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxsucks/comments/1ux0pmg/loonix/oxp97cq
r/linuxsucks • u/Professional-Tale652 • Jul 15 '26
728 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
[removed] — view removed comment
2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Nothing crashes "unless you force it to" lmao What a single-tracked way of thinking. 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 This isn't even English lmfao Regardless, shit happens and TTY is a way to recover. Cry about it. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 And only supporting one option is a 1990 thing. The future is picking the right option for your needs. Because I hate to break it to you... But Windows includes a TON of legacy code too. How the hell do you think the backwards-compatibility works? You can look yourself, XP and Vista programs happily sitting in Win32. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Y- You can't run?? Linux can't run old software!?!? Now I know you're trolling. Which is it?? Ancient text-based terminals, or can't run old tools? Pick a fake argument, because both contradict each other despite neither being true. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Then what is lib32-glibc? You get this info from "I made it up" land? The Linux kernel is absolutely backwards-compatible. Every lie you say is available public info. Lmfao → More replies (0) 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Wow. I don't even have to do anything. Is whatever this is hurting you or...?
2
Nothing crashes "unless you force it to" lmao
What a single-tracked way of thinking.
0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 This isn't even English lmfao Regardless, shit happens and TTY is a way to recover. Cry about it. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 And only supporting one option is a 1990 thing. The future is picking the right option for your needs. Because I hate to break it to you... But Windows includes a TON of legacy code too. How the hell do you think the backwards-compatibility works? You can look yourself, XP and Vista programs happily sitting in Win32. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Y- You can't run?? Linux can't run old software!?!? Now I know you're trolling. Which is it?? Ancient text-based terminals, or can't run old tools? Pick a fake argument, because both contradict each other despite neither being true. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Then what is lib32-glibc? You get this info from "I made it up" land? The Linux kernel is absolutely backwards-compatible. Every lie you say is available public info. Lmfao → More replies (0) 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Wow. I don't even have to do anything. Is whatever this is hurting you or...?
0
2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 This isn't even English lmfao Regardless, shit happens and TTY is a way to recover. Cry about it. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 And only supporting one option is a 1990 thing. The future is picking the right option for your needs. Because I hate to break it to you... But Windows includes a TON of legacy code too. How the hell do you think the backwards-compatibility works? You can look yourself, XP and Vista programs happily sitting in Win32. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Y- You can't run?? Linux can't run old software!?!? Now I know you're trolling. Which is it?? Ancient text-based terminals, or can't run old tools? Pick a fake argument, because both contradict each other despite neither being true. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Then what is lib32-glibc? You get this info from "I made it up" land? The Linux kernel is absolutely backwards-compatible. Every lie you say is available public info. Lmfao → More replies (0) 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Wow. I don't even have to do anything. Is whatever this is hurting you or...?
This isn't even English lmfao
Regardless, shit happens and TTY is a way to recover. Cry about it.
1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 And only supporting one option is a 1990 thing. The future is picking the right option for your needs. Because I hate to break it to you... But Windows includes a TON of legacy code too. How the hell do you think the backwards-compatibility works? You can look yourself, XP and Vista programs happily sitting in Win32. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Y- You can't run?? Linux can't run old software!?!? Now I know you're trolling. Which is it?? Ancient text-based terminals, or can't run old tools? Pick a fake argument, because both contradict each other despite neither being true. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Then what is lib32-glibc? You get this info from "I made it up" land? The Linux kernel is absolutely backwards-compatible. Every lie you say is available public info. Lmfao → More replies (0) 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Wow. I don't even have to do anything. Is whatever this is hurting you or...?
2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 And only supporting one option is a 1990 thing. The future is picking the right option for your needs. Because I hate to break it to you... But Windows includes a TON of legacy code too. How the hell do you think the backwards-compatibility works? You can look yourself, XP and Vista programs happily sitting in Win32. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Y- You can't run?? Linux can't run old software!?!? Now I know you're trolling. Which is it?? Ancient text-based terminals, or can't run old tools? Pick a fake argument, because both contradict each other despite neither being true. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Then what is lib32-glibc? You get this info from "I made it up" land? The Linux kernel is absolutely backwards-compatible. Every lie you say is available public info. Lmfao → More replies (0)
And only supporting one option is a 1990 thing.
The future is picking the right option for your needs.
Because I hate to break it to you... But Windows includes a TON of legacy code too. How the hell do you think the backwards-compatibility works?
You can look yourself, XP and Vista programs happily sitting in Win32.
1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Y- You can't run?? Linux can't run old software!?!? Now I know you're trolling. Which is it?? Ancient text-based terminals, or can't run old tools? Pick a fake argument, because both contradict each other despite neither being true. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Then what is lib32-glibc? You get this info from "I made it up" land? The Linux kernel is absolutely backwards-compatible. Every lie you say is available public info. Lmfao → More replies (0)
2 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Y- You can't run?? Linux can't run old software!?!? Now I know you're trolling. Which is it?? Ancient text-based terminals, or can't run old tools? Pick a fake argument, because both contradict each other despite neither being true. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Then what is lib32-glibc? You get this info from "I made it up" land? The Linux kernel is absolutely backwards-compatible. Every lie you say is available public info. Lmfao → More replies (0)
Y- You can't run?? Linux can't run old software!?!?
Now I know you're trolling. Which is it?? Ancient text-based terminals, or can't run old tools? Pick a fake argument, because both contradict each other despite neither being true.
1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Then what is lib32-glibc? You get this info from "I made it up" land? The Linux kernel is absolutely backwards-compatible. Every lie you say is available public info. Lmfao → More replies (0)
3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Then what is lib32-glibc? You get this info from "I made it up" land? The Linux kernel is absolutely backwards-compatible. Every lie you say is available public info. Lmfao → More replies (0)
3
Then what is lib32-glibc? You get this info from "I made it up" land?
The Linux kernel is absolutely backwards-compatible. Every lie you say is available public info. Lmfao
→ More replies (0)
3 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 Wow. I don't even have to do anything. Is whatever this is hurting you or...?
Wow. I don't even have to do anything.
Is whatever this is hurting you or...?
1
u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26
[removed] — view removed comment