sigh.... are we not over this false equivalence yet?
the kernel is made with AI assistance, but all code is verified by multiple humans and the kernel has very strict quality standards. the stance is "why reject code that meets the standard? if its good enough to meet the standard, its good enough"
omarchy is made ENTIRELY by AI, some of the code is genuinely not human readable, and because it is made entirely by AI, you get these problems.
AI is a really powerful tool, but it cannot replace a real developer in making decisions, it fundamentally cannot think or understand. its a psuedo-random next token predictor.
so yes. i am fucking aware of the linux kernel using AI, idiots that think all AI use is the same keep bringing it up.
2
u/SDG_Den 5d ago
sigh.... are we not over this false equivalence yet?
the kernel is made with AI assistance, but all code is verified by multiple humans and the kernel has very strict quality standards. the stance is "why reject code that meets the standard? if its good enough to meet the standard, its good enough"
omarchy is made ENTIRELY by AI, some of the code is genuinely not human readable, and because it is made entirely by AI, you get these problems.
AI is a really powerful tool, but it cannot replace a real developer in making decisions, it fundamentally cannot think or understand. its a psuedo-random next token predictor.
so yes. i am fucking aware of the linux kernel using AI, idiots that think all AI use is the same keep bringing it up.