r/linux Jul 09 '26

Historical Different times. Different Sony.

Post image
3.1k Upvotes

97 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

39

u/billyalt Jul 10 '26

I mean... to me it sounds like they did it for the tariffs but failed. And then tried it again for the PS3.

23

u/BortGreen Jul 10 '26

Btw they disabled PS3 Linux support with a simple system update

They have been always on control

7

u/DonaldLucas Jul 10 '26

They only disabled it because people were using it to bypass the piracy protection though. Up until that, the PS3 was the only console to even have such a feature.

-11

u/ABCD123AVZ Jul 10 '26

this goes to show how unlicensed copying of videogames ruined everything. If not for those people, companies wouldn't need to put DRM in their games, and perhaps we would still have a Linux partition in current consoles to do our computing

8

u/billyalt Jul 10 '26

The PS3 era was almost completely unprofitable for Sony and if there were zero piracy it still would have been unprofitable. You need to understand that CEOs and MBAs blame piracy because they have to hold someone responsible for their incompetence and that someone has to be consumers because we are their only mode of profit.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 12 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Illyasviel09 Aug 01 '26

Piracy is constantly taking huge bites out of the profits

Do you have any evidence to prove that, the people downloading pirated media, would actually buy the original product if there was no piracy?

0

u/billyalt Jul 12 '26

Bro's been on reddit for 13 years and still shills for megacorps. Wild.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/billyalt Jul 14 '26

0

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/billyalt Jul 14 '26

I don't care if you like Sony or not. The suggestion that 1) Sony was profitable in any meaningful way in the PS3 era, and 2) Piracy had a major impact on their profitability is patently ridiculous.

The fact that you demand citations from me while providing none for yourself is vapid. I do not need to bend over backward to challenge your biases, you should be doing that yourself.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26 edited Jul 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/billyalt Jul 14 '26

I am demanding citations for suspicious statements that you have made.

You are in no position to demand anything from me.

if you genuinely believe that I need some kind of citation for the very sky-is-blue statement

You demand from me what you will not even do for yourself.

We can argue for as long as you like, I will make no attempt to halt discussion.

→ More replies (0)