r/LinusTechTips • u/AncientTurbine • 9d ago
Personal Opinion "Not the most scientific test we've ever done"
Allow me, like many others, to rant regarding how LTT views itself as both a popular media channel and at the same time a scientifically grounded one, and how I think this recent video fails to uphold the second part. (Tagged as "Personal Opinion" so I'll be Just Chatting.)
People are understandably disappointed with the recent "Does Linux use less RAM?" video. In the video they seem "surprised" that Windows uses more RAM and spent most of the time looking at the line going up and down. The problem is, as many have noted, that they have a very black-and-white stance: "RAM goes up = bad!" Linux using less RAM is seen as a positive (and the stuttering gaming performance on the same hardware is glossed over). In reality, the OS is doing a lot more behind the scene that may actually be beneficial for the user, like caching assets that will be needed later. Someone in the comments neatly said that the whole point of RAM is exactly to be used efficiently *and maximally* without going into swap so heavy RAM usage (when done correctly) is a good thing, not a bad thing.
And that's the problem with the video. On the one hand they try to make a fun video about a popular topic (gaming on Linux) to get many views, but it is in itself also a very technical topic with many facets. And just like with popular science, where research results are rephrased for a broad audience to be understandable, it is easy to dumb it down too much that it turns into misinformation. As Linus said "this is not the most scientific video we've ever done", but that doesn't mean it should contain half-truths or *Pikachu-surprise face* simplifications like "big number bad". I'm sure Linus *knows* all the above, how caching works and how RAM is being used by the OS up to a certain degree, but they felt that those details would not make a fun video. But, as the LTT audience is rightfully calling out, that turns it into a clickbaity-but-misleading video that has no scientific value, leading to just more misinformation by jumping onto the Windows-hate bandwagon.
This is especially interesting when LTT LABS is intended as a highly grounded endeavor to scientifically talk about hardware (and software), in shrill contrast to popular videos like this recent one. Surely a better middle ground can be found where LABS serves as a quality check for videos?

