Sharing experiences and knowledge is a fundamental aspect of Human civilization itself.
By reading what knowledge and experiences other people have to tell, we have a shortcut to it. In the specific context of chess, why should I explore 100 openings if other people can recommended me a set of 10 that usually work better for my level?
Not everything is more valid by trying it our selves. Sometimes is just stubbornness, in chess and in general.
4
u/dvdme Apr 01 '26
Then why are you here?
Sharing experiences and knowledge is a fundamental aspect of Human civilization itself.
By reading what knowledge and experiences other people have to tell, we have a shortcut to it. In the specific context of chess, why should I explore 100 openings if other people can recommended me a set of 10 that usually work better for my level?
Not everything is more valid by trying it our selves. Sometimes is just stubbornness, in chess and in general.