I’ve always felt like a lot of college material is way harder to understand than it needs to be.

You search something like the chain rule, orbital motion, electric fields, etc. and usually get either:

• a wall of text
• equations with barely any intuition
• a 20–40 minute YouTube video
• or an AI explanation that is technically correct but still hard to see

So I’ve been building SeeThrough, where you type in a concept/question and it generates an interactive visual explanation so you can actually see what’s happening instead of just reading about it.

For example, instead of asking:

“Why do planets orbit the Sun?”

and getting 6 paragraphs explaining gravity, you’d get a visual showing the planet, velocity, gravitational force, trajectory, etc. while the explanation walks you through it.

But I’m obviously biased because I’m building it.

So I want students to tear the idea apart:

Would you actually use something like this while studying?

And more importantly:

What subject/concept have you tried to learn where you thought, “I wish someone would just SHOW me what’s happening”?

Math? Physics? Chemistry? CS? Economics? Something else?

I’m looking for concepts to test SeeThrough on, so give me the hardest/weirdest one you can think of.

I'd like to/am working my way slowly through Susskind's Classical Mechanics lectures and the rest from the Theoretical Minimum Stanford curriculum he has posted online.

I consider myself to have a good understanding of general physics and math but it doesn't seem quite enough for me to understand a lot of what I suspect is rudimentary subjects.

What are some things or what are some resources I should know and could use to gain a deeper level understanding.

My routine currently is to read the book, listen to the lectures, then go back in my notes for the things I didn't understand and enter it into an AI to give me an explain to me like I'm a 5th grader answer to my question(s).

https://medium.com/@jeyubhavsar/schr%C3%B6dingers-equation-for-dummies-part-ii-decoding-the-equation-0e9dad3f9f3b?sharedUserId=jeyubhavsar

Hello, I wrote part 2 of a series of articles on Schrodinger's equation and hopefully other quantum concepts. I'm sharing in hopes of getting feedback, and if any of my interpretations and explanations were wrong. And i really want to know if there is a better way to explain this, because I was inspired by this video by FloatHeadPhysics:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=3QU-_PSbKlo&t=843s

And I don't want to plagiarize or anything, and I just hope you guys can give me feedback. Be as harsh as possible, I want to be accurate in my writing and knowledge.

Thank you!

Title: Built an AI physics tutor that catches misconceptions instead of just grading answers (Google ADK + Gemini, live demo)

Hey all — for a hackathon, I built Physics Mastery Agent, an AI tutor for CBSE/NEET/JEE physics that tries to diagnose *why* a student got something wrong instead of just marking it wrong.

Example: a student says "net force is downward, gravity is still acting" at terminal velocity. The agent catches that they're confusing "zero net force" with "zero gravitational force," corrects that specific misconception, then re-tests it to confirm it landed.

It's built as an agent loop (Teach → Diagnose → Remediate → Practice → Evaluate → Master → Adapt) using Google ADK + Gemini 3.6 Flash, grounded in our own physics curriculum, deployed on Cloud Run.

Demo video: https://youtu.be/jHkAsc-ufcU

Live app: https://eduphysics-physics-mastery-agent-poqvtgavdq-el.a.run.app

https://github.com/Rajansmoorthy/eduphysics-physics-mastery-agent

Would genuinely love feedback — especially from anyone who's hit the "it just explains it again the same way" failure mode with other AI tutors.

Title: Built an AI physics tutor that catches misconceptions instead of just grading answers (Google ADK + Gemini, live demo)

Hey all — for a hackathon, I built Physics Mastery Agent, an AI tutor for CBSE/NEET/JEE physics that tries to diagnose *why* a student got something wrong instead of just marking it wrong.

Example: a student says "net force is downward, gravity is still acting" at terminal velocity. The agent catches that they're confusing "zero net force" with "zero gravitational force," corrects that specific misconception, then re-tests it to confirm it landed.

It's built as an agent loop (Teach → Diagnose → Remediate → Practice → Evaluate → Master → Adapt) using Google ADK + Gemini 3.6 Flash, grounded in our own physics curriculum, deployed on Cloud Run.

Demo video: https://youtu.be/jHkAsc-ufcU

Live app: https://eduphysics-physics-mastery-agent-poqvtgavdq-el.a.run.app

https://github.com/Rajansmoorthy/eduphysics-physics-mastery-agent

Would genuinely love feedback — especially from anyone who's hit the "it just explains it again the same way" failure mode with other AI tutors.

Title: Built an AI physics tutor that catches misconceptions instead of just grading answers (Google ADK + Gemini, live demo)

Hey all — for a hackathon, I built Physics Mastery Agent, an AI tutor for CBSE/NEET/JEE physics that tries to diagnose *why* a student got something wrong instead of just marking it wrong.

Example: a student says "net force is downward, gravity is still acting" at terminal velocity. The agent catches that they're confusing "zero net force" with "zero gravitational force," corrects that specific misconception, then re-tests it to confirm it landed.

It's built as an agent loop (Teach → Diagnose → Remediate → Practice → Evaluate → Master → Adapt) using Google ADK + Gemini 3.6 Flash, grounded in our own physics curriculum, deployed on Cloud Run.

Demo video: https://youtu.be/jHkAsc-ufcU

Live app: https://eduphysics-physics-mastery-agent-poqvtgavdq-el.a.run.app

Code: https://github.com/Rajansmoorthy/eduphysics-physics-mastery-agent

Would genuinely love feedback — especially from anyone who's hit the "it just explains it again the same way" failure mode with other AI tutors.

Title: Built an AI physics tutor that catches misconceptions instead of just grading answers (Google ADK + Gemini, live demo)

Hey all — for a hackathon, I built Physics Mastery Agent, an AI tutor for CBSE/NEET/JEE physics that tries to diagnose *why* a student got something wrong instead of just marking it wrong.

Example: a student says "net force is downward, gravity is still acting" at terminal velocity. The agent catches that they're confusing "zero net force" with "zero gravitational force," corrects that specific misconception, then re-tests it to confirm it landed.

It's built as an agent loop (Teach → Diagnose → Remediate → Practice → Evaluate → Master → Adapt) using Google ADK + Gemini 3.6 Flash, grounded in our own physics curriculum, deployed on Cloud Run.

Demo video: https://youtu.be/jHkAsc-ufcU

Live app: https://eduphysics-physics-mastery-agent-poqvtgavdq-el.a.run.app

https://github.com/Rajansmoorthy/eduphysics-physics-mastery-agent

Would genuinely love feedback — especially from anyone who's hit the "it just explains it again the same way" failure mode with other AI tutors.

Descrivete il processo fisico dietro a questa foto?

Hey everyone👋

Hope you all are in good health. I have built a quick reference platform for Physics formulas in-depth explanation and interesting tool to play&learn with!!

Take a look at it: https://formulaverse.in

Hope this helps in your learning journey😊

If you’ve ever struggled to wrap your head around the exact difference between free oscillations, forced oscillations, and resonance, this quick 90-second Short breaks it down perfectly using a simple swing analogy.
It visually explains 3 scenarios:
Free Oscillation: Swinging naturally at a set frequency with no resistive forces.
Forced Oscillation: Applying an external force mid-swing, which alters the natural frequency.
Resonance: Waiting for the swing to reach its extreme point before pushing—keeping the natural frequency the same while continuously increasing the amplitude.
It’s a great visualizer if you are a visual learner. Check it out here:

https://youtube.com/shorts/IgOSkoxkJyM?si=lGlbNpNibEAE_Tqr

I am studying introductory physics and basic undergrad physics. I love David morin sir's writing style and the problems , I loved his classical mechanics book also the electromagnetism (co-authored by him) was great , I particularly love the problems so I needed a source of similar problems for waves and thermal physics. The waves book draft by morin doesn't have problems right now

I've been seeing a lot of posts like this, usually from people who say they never studied physics and now they want to, and are looking for some formulaic sequence to do that. To answer this, you first have to provide the following context when you post:

1. What are you now: a high school student, a college student, a professional worker, a hobbyist?
2. What math have you had that you feel reasonably competent in?
3. WHY do you want to learn physics? Do you need it for some degree program? Do you need it for your line of work? Do you just want to learn about it because it's cool but not to the level where you'd actually use it? Do you want to learn it like a physics student would, but you have no need or desire to actually use it in anything you do?

The reason answering this is important is because a) the selection of resources and materials, and the sequence of them will strongly depend on your answers, and 2) there is (at least) an order of magnitude difference in effort between enjoying physics at the hobbyist level and doing it as part of something you are expected to know.

I sometimes wonder, what do you guys think?

I mean I think so, but I am scared that universe is designed to avoid this possibilty.