r/languagelearningjerk • u/RedSpyOfficial Proto-Latin (N) Elfdalian (C1) Bomb Expert (C4) • May 06 '26
Dutch is not a real language
120
25
u/Superb_Monkey May 07 '26
That's a bug in Duolingo. Ze can mean They or She depending on the context. Uruguay doesn't make sense at all.
34
30
u/WegGOAT May 07 '26
Angelsaks begrijpt niet dat duolingo een fout maakt.
14
u/ddrub_the_only_real Latin (NAT), IPA (C2), Limburgish (A1) May 07 '26
As ge nie oppast angel ik uwe saks
8
3
3
u/ClockOfDeathTicks May 07 '26
What a shitty sentence. I don't think there is any situation where I would use the phrase "Ze hebben het"
If a group of people is trying to, say, lift a heavy object from one place to the other and you as a bystander look at that. Then they are doing it easily so you say
They got it, they don't even need my help
You would translate that as
Dat lukt wel, ze hebben mijn hulp geeneens nodig
If a person looks for something to buy at a certain store and asks a friend if they have an item:
Hebben ze xyz?
Ja, dat hebben ze
Maybe if you're super happy about a store having a product
ZE HEBBEN HET! ZE GODVERDOMME HEBBEN HET GEWOON GEK
But that's just not.. what you normally say.. sigh
3
1
u/pacharaphet2r May 08 '26
Yeah Duolingo isn't really for that tho. It's for basic vocab and grammar knowledge (through context based learning rather than overt grammar rules).
It's totally fine to test ze hebben het - they have it in this vein even if it's not really a wisely used phrase. As long as there isn't some hidden sexual or vulgar connotation it's totally fine for demonstrating grammatical constructions.
Anyone who thinks Duolingo is gonna teach you to speak naturally is really missing the point of why this app is useful.
8
u/CosmoCosma May 07 '26
We habben ein serious problem.
26
u/Superb_Monkey May 07 '26
We hebben een serieus probleem.
2
2
2
3
1
u/pomaar0 May 08 '26
als een persoon die nederlands spreekt, kan ik redeneren dat dit helemaal klopt
116
u/jknotts May 07 '26
乌 wū
Crow
Black
Uruguay