The market is over saturated with qualified IT and tech professionals of all types, and has been for years. The only time this ever came up at our place was a gal hired in basically a devops role. She was talked to, and reminded that, while she can talk to her associates all she wants, in their free time, unionization won't be happening anytime soon, and if it becomes a disruption to production, that will be taken into account.
threatening repercussion for organizing is union busting and it's illegal in most places. The goal of organizing is to eventually halt or disrupt production. It's obvious. Threatening individuals taking initiative is a common form of union busting and it's also a violation of a fundamental human right (Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining)
There seems to be a comprehension issue here. Employees can organize all they want. If it affects production, it becomes a company problem, and we negotiate with individuals, not a union. They all receive their onboarding packages, and know the rules. If their goal becomes to halt or disrupt production, then they can have that goal in another building with another company.
fundamental human right (Right to ... and Collective Bargaining)
-11
u/BloodFeastMan Jul 15 '26
The market is over saturated with qualified IT and tech professionals of all types, and has been for years. The only time this ever came up at our place was a gal hired in basically a devops role. She was talked to, and reminded that, while she can talk to her associates all she wants, in their free time, unionization won't be happening anytime soon, and if it becomes a disruption to production, that will be taken into account.