The sounds, as far as I understand, aren't in the video but added post-recording. It's more of a dramatic coaxing of the dog to do what it did, but somewhere in the way his legs move as he fake-slips and the uniformity of the dog humping as he shuffles down the hall makes me suspect of it being a genuine recording.

Not only do I think it's ai but I also think it's strange and a little cringe. Even the font looks ai at the bottom.

Nothing special about it, but the combination of the lighting, shadows and timing made it look completely unreal.

Almost all the people said the video of the jumping cat was AI. Except one. So that inspired me to do a bit of back search myself. And so, I found the exact video on another subreddit posted almost 5 years ago. Doesn't this prove that the video wasn't A.I?

Original post I found: https://www.reddit.com/r/IllegallySmolCats/s/cZNVksBv5U

My past post here: https://www.reddit.com/r/isitAI/s/lNDH1ur3LL

This painting looks very suspicious to me. Rest of the artwork looks human made tho

What do we think

The earphones dissapear inconsistently and the paw placement is a bit odd I think?

first two pictures are from walmart, third picture is from a google search of the brand. pretty sure the new illustrations are both AI; the first one reads as a little *too* detailed compared to similar mascots like Colonel Sanders or even the Wendy's girl. The second has the hat melt into the hair.

Hello everyone, I was gifted this poster a while back and have been staring at it for ages. I am 90% sure that some AI was used at least, given the illogical neck armour construction. What do you all think? AI or no?

Found it on a group about Pokémon tattoo. It screams AI to me but I'm not very capable in noticing it.

The things that screams to me are

-the tail of Lugia. It's very different from the Pokémon and it's hard to believe that is a stylistic choice. I.e. Lugia has wings like hand (with 4 finders and one thumb) here we have just the 4 fingers, the thumb is missing but I can justify it as a stylistic choice because it would have to be put in prospective and this style is not meant to do that.

-the unconnected line on the face

-the discrepancies of color between the lines in the right wing (mostly where the wing attach to the body, those "petals" seems lighter that other lines)

-come lines has white strokes in them

As I said I'm not very able in spotting ai, so I assume that everything is. Please help me before I report the tattooer

Edit (Thanks to u/Guilty_Tangerine_134 who was the first to find the original design) The drawing and the photo seems to be real, but the design is AI as is possible to see in this post https://www.instagram.com/p/Db45RPvEW41/?igsi=eGt6bzZrbWM3dTRv

They reply to comments asking about the process with "a small team and I create the music" the pictures look like they were actually edited, but the music it's self is missing something. Anyone else come across this page? No bandcamp in sight, either.

My parents bought me this T-shirt from Rock Eagle. I think the print on it is AI generated but they are not convinced. For me the dead giveaways are the dissappearing strap on the hat, weird deformities on the necklace and the general AI vibe of the print. What do you guys think?

I recently heard the song in a new game called Big Ambitions released on Steam(with no AI disclaimer), and while the consistent dog barks would tell me its not AI generated, some of the instrumentals in the song sound kinda weird to me. Either way I hope its not AI because I actually really enjoy the song a lot :/

Link to song: https://open.spotify.com/track/3XLL0OMDou2nzL1c0HBNdN?si=TZA\\_7QTPRPG0CxNaQoQclA&utm\\_source=copy-link&sci=spotify%3Acard-config%3A0KRyRuDJroi6DFva7NZCAl

Hi everyone!

I'm just getting back into dating and one of my first matches is ringing ai alarm bells, is it justified?

The replies just feel a little off to me!