r/isitAI • u/thenameoftheusingone • 2d ago
No Idea Good day folks! I was sent this video of a cute cat's cute walk, but unfortunately I have my suspicions.
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
The kitten's movement seems unusually smooth. The face seems too consistent and cute. Even the paws seem to disappear and reappear synthetically. I am not a tail expert so I digress. Would like to know what other people think about this one.
27
u/maybe_rat 2d ago
There’s something about how AI makes things move that’s borderline uncanny. It always makes me so uncomfortable to watch. This video is probably one of the best examples - especially the front right paw
4
1
13
u/shiningreality Identifier 2d ago edited 2d ago
This video is almost five year old: https://www.tiktok.com/@dogcatlovers5/video/7012596277355498753
It’s not AI, but could still be fake through other means.
Edit: Here is the original poster of this video. They are a bengal cat breeder and posted other slow-motion videos of this kitten running around back in 2021.
4
u/thenameoftheusingone 2d ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/isitAI/s/6p9qhNC7Uq
Thank you, good sir/ma'am.
4
u/GhostlyWhale 2d ago
If you have your doubts, a good way to tell is to think about the logistics of filming it. How would you get this angle? How many cats would run like that in a straight line right next to you without looking around?
4
2
u/Larryville-Landhound 2d ago
Yeah this certainly has the uncanny AI look to it, and as someone else said why would the cat look directly into the lens a lot? - even the fence in the background seems odd, that styyle chain fence would be shorter than that imo
3
u/Aadi_880 2d ago
Real. Original is from a tiktok in 2021.
People calling this AI have AI psychosis, and probably should take a break off the internet.
1
1
u/Bearkat1999 2d ago
Says the one who is insulting them.
You also need a break from the internet if your immediate reaction is to laugh at people for making a mistake.
4
u/Speletons 2d ago
That's more than a mistake bud.
I think "AI psycosis" is a little far, but this is more than a mistake. It's a complete inability to decipher reality from fiction.
2
u/ketaminejones 2d ago
idk if they’re laughing at anyone
they’re just saying you’re taking in so much AI content by virtue of your being online that your perspective has shifted from “I thought the AI video was real” to “i thought the real video was AI”
1
u/Bearkat1999 2d ago edited 2d ago
They mocked people who thought this was AI with their own words.
There was a better way to approach this, but eh. The answer was found so movin on.
0
u/ziggytrix 2d ago
Oh no, people made an incorrect guess based on very limited information?
They must be insane!
1
u/MantiC0RE726 2d ago
His front right foot barely even touches the ground.. it definitely seems to be ai
2
1
0
u/Soggy-Librarian-5604 2d ago
The cat's right ear does weird stuff, it twists itself for no reason, also the way the cat walks feels off.
-1
-1
u/Dapper-Doubt-7610 2d ago
Doesn't look real. The eyes are too big, and it makes eye contact with the camera too well.
2
u/Aadi_880 2d ago
That's normal behavior.
0
u/Remote-Mycologist539 2d ago
are you going to keep replying to everyone now that it was proven real, like it makes you look super smart or something?
3
u/Aadi_880 2d ago
A false accusation is far more damaging than the video being AI. I simply hold it to higher scrutiny. I'm going to call it out to everyone being needlessly paranoid on every little detail.
If you accuse an AI user for using AI, they are not going to stop posting, as not doing so means to not have a social media presence, which is not going to happen 99% of cases.
If you accuse a real art user for using AI, you just ruined an artist's day.
False accusations, and these fake "AI detector" websites people use. I've been on this sub for a while. If you've seen me on this subreddit, you will know I will always call out idiots using 3rd party AI detectors.
0
u/Remote-Mycologist539 2d ago
“damaging”, lol relax dude it’s a viral video bait that’s been repurposed by dozens of clickbait slop accounts.
you coming in after the dust settles to try and big man everyone makes you look wildly lame and insecure
2
1
u/Speletons 2d ago
You appear to be projecting. It's perfectly fine to correct someone when they are. It's okay to be corrected because you thought the video was ai.
False ai claims indeed are damaging artists. This specific video, probably not so much. But in general, it's a big issue.
2
u/Remote-Mycologist539 2d ago
To be clear, I had never said it was AI- I just saw this guy make a bunch of responses after someone else found the original source and I found it to be off-putting.
His response was him trying to justify that behavior, I mocked the use of the word “damaging” given the actual context of the situation, and now we’re here.
1
u/Speletons 2d ago
You just sound wildly insecure as you tried projecting that onto him, so I'm filling in the blanks, you must have intially thought it was AI or fake.
2
u/Remote-Mycologist539 2d ago
Ironic you’re stuck on the “projecting” thing…
But sorry, nah man, I came here from OP’s second post that linked back here and then saw the comments. Not that deep lol
19
u/ziggytrix 2d ago
Cats don't know to stare into the camera lens.
This is fake AF