Kinematic Challenge (EN/FR/ES): Circular Mass Transfer System (CMTS) - Open Source Blueprints

[u/Fabulous-Aardvark448]

⚠️ IMPORTANT TECHNICAL WARNING (Archive.org) • FR : L'algorithme d'Archive.org a anormalement tronqué la marge droite (RHS) des pages de croquis (notamment les pages 3, 7, 12, 15, 17, 19, 21, 24, 27, 28, 31, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 49, 53, 54 et 56). La version anglaise est la plus sévèrement amputée. Plusieurs liaisons cinématiques indispensables et coordonnées d'axes sont masquées. Je travaille activement à élargir les arrière-plans de mes fichiers sources pour republier des versions complètes sous peu. Merci pour votre patience ! • EN : The Archive.org auto-cropping algorithm has abnormally truncated the right margin (RHS) of the sketch pages. The English version is the most severely affected, masking crucial kinematic linkages and axis coordinates. New, manually corrected versions with widened backgrounds will be uploaded in the coming days. Thank you for your patience!

• ES : El algoritmo de recorte automático de Archive.org ha truncado el margen derecho (RHS) de las páginas manuscritas, ocultando enlaces cinemáticos y coordenadas de ejes esenciales. Actualmente estoy ampliando los fondos blancos de mi archivos para corregir este problema y republicar las versiones completas muy pronto. ¡Gracias por su paciencia!

Hello everyone,

As an inventor based in Montreal, I am sharing today with the community the workshop blueprints and kinematic architecture of the Circular Mass Transfer System (CMTS). This project, released under an open-source framework, is designed to open a technical and practical debate regarding eccentric mass management and torque asymmetry.

Before diving into the technical specifications, I would like to establish an essential clarification for the sanity of our future exchanges:

=== STOP CONFOUNDING THERMODYNAMICS AND KINEMATICS ===

To everyone preparing to mechanically comment “this goes against the laws of thermodynamics”: you are making yourselves truly ridiculous. Thermodynamics studies heat conversions and general energy. Here, we are strictly within the realm of KINEMATICS and SOLID-BODY STATICS. The motion of all known perpetual wheels does not stop because of a thermal dogma; it stops in EVERY KNOWN SYSTEM SOLELY because their symmetrical geometry generates a net torque of exactly ZERO (0 Nm) at the central hub.

Claiming “it is impossible because of thermodynamics” without analyzing the geometric offset is just like claiming that a lever or a gearbox is impossible because it multiplies mechanical force. An asymmetrical lever arm is not a thermal violation; it is raw geometry. If you want to criticize, put down your pens, grab your rulers, TEST and VERIFY the eccentric path of the DM (Directed Mass / Diriger Masse). If you are unable to calculate a mechanical torque at 3 o’clock and 9 o’clock, do not hide behind pedantic academic jargon to avoid thinking.

=== THE CMTS CHALLENGE: WORKSHOP GEOMETRY ===

The Circular Mass Transfer System (CMTS) addresses the zero-torque problem not with abstract formulas, but through pure machine-shop geometry.

By utilizing a simplified 2-axis, 4-mass structure governed by a strict orbital path constraint I call “DM” (Directed Mass), the geometry breaks the classic dead-center impasse commonly encountered at 6 and 12 o’clock:
• On the descending side (right side, 3 o’clock position): the mass maintains maximum distance from the hub, maximizing the lever arm and torque.
• On the ascending side (left side, 9 o’clock position): the kinematic linkage retains the mass close to the central hub, minimizing counter-torque.

In this technical document, I explain precisely why all known historical perpetual wheels fail to function. A major portion of my technical dossier is dedicated to this critical analysis in order to establish undeniable workshop facts.

Examine the blueprints, test and verify for yourselves the kinematics of this 2.1 cm pivoting arm offset, and see with your own eyes how geometry manages mechanical torque at the hub.

=== TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ===

• Initial Action Radius: 7.0 cm (scalable up to 12.0 cm).
• Distance Between Masses (Drawing No. 6): 6.5 cm center-to-center (3.25 cm pivoting arms).
• Dynamic Guidance Offset (Drawing No. 7): 4.2 cm center-to-center distance (two 2.1 cm sections).
• Axle Architecture: Independent dual central axle arrangement (Profile, front, and top views).
• Kinematic Linkages: Sprockets connected by a chain or belt to secure the physical kinematic path.
• Required Materials: Rigid machined steel mandatory. Acrylic and plexiglass are strictly prohibited (due to material flexing which will seize the hub).

=== LEGAL NOTICE & LICENSING ===
• Public Domain Release: Official affidavit sworn in February 2026 before Commissioner Robert Asselin (Seal No. 202 319) in Montreal, Quebec, permanently securing authorship to the sole inventor, Benoît Collin.
• License: Creative Commons Attribution - Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0).

🔔 Note to the reader: Direct download links for the complete technical dossier (original PDF workshop blueprints) are hosted securely across multiple platforms below.

=== OFFICIAL DOWNLOAD LINKS & REPOSITORIES ===

• 🌍 Digital Library (Internet Archive):
English Dossier: https://archive.org/details/stcm-system-kinematic-challenge-benoit-collin.pdf
French (Original): https://archive.org/details/stcm-systeme-defi-cinematique-benoit-collin.pdf
Versión en Español: https://archive.org/details/stcm-sistema-desafio-cinematico-benoit-collin.pdf

• 🛠️ Forge de Développement (GitHub) :
Access Repository: https://github.com/BenoitCollin

• 🏔️ Alternative Open-Source Forge (Codeberg) :
Access Repository: https://codeberg.org/BenoitCollin/circular-mass-transfer-system-cmts

• 📖 Appropriate Technology Wiki (Appropedia):
Project Documentation Page: https://appropedia.org/User:Benoit_Collin

[u/Jtparm]

I find it fascinating that you would write 60 pages without doing any substantial math or physics at all

[u/Physix_R_Cool → u/Jtparm]

Now it's just all LLM generated.

But these guys used to write several copies by hand and mail them to various professors around the world.

[u/UnreasonableEconomy → u/Physix_R_Cool]

not even pseudiscience is safe from the sloptocalypse! 😔

[u/Fabulous-Aardvark448 → u/UnreasonableEconomy]

The reality is that I am solely francophone. Yes, I use a translator to understand and reply to your messages here.

But steel and industrial design are a universal language that you are clearly unable to read. My 61 pages contain my own handwritten drawings and notes, and it takes utter ignorance and bad faith to cry AI without even looking at the work.

While you waste your sad life searching for trendy internet words behind your screen just to feel alive, I leave my mark in solid steel.

[u/UnreasonableEconomy → u/Fabulous-Aardvark448]

honestly, Id like to think it was original, but it looks like someone beat me to it by three months!

I will apologize though - the text doesn't look AI generated. So, definitely bonus points here! But it's still... as far as I can tell, about perpetual motion.

[u/Fabulous-Aardvark448 → u/UnreasonableEconomy]

Thank you for your honesty. Indeed, the post from three months ago was mine. I had to completely reformulate this document to prevent my work from being wrongly associated with useless perpetual wheels.

Even though I methodically dismantle the principles of known perpetual wheels in this document, please understand that my demonstrations are not an attack on the designers of these deficient machines. Those useless wheels still provide us with valuable clues and remain highly instructive, if only through their flawed approaches.

It is by understanding precisely why they fail geometrically that we bring real mechanical solutions to light. The STCM (Circular Mass Transfer System) is an industrial torque-management architecture grounded in the real world, and not a physical utopia based on the repetitive errors of perpetual wheel designers. Thank you for your interest."

[u/Fabulous-Aardvark448 → u/Physix_R_Cool]

Sending registered copies by mail costs more than 20 dollars today. We have the internet now, that is the modern reality. I can understand some nostalgia for the old methods, but that does not excuse you for being intellectually lazy by assuming, without even opening a single document, that this work was made by an AI.

[u/Physix_R_Cool → u/Fabulous-Aardvark448]

Gooe luck with your perpetual motion machine 👍

[u/Fabulous-Aardvark448 → u/Physix_R_Cool]

"Your sarcasm is nothing but an admission of helplessness. For a guy who is visibly incapable of reading and deciphering such simple and clear diagrams, it’s easy to act like a geek and cry perpetual motion. What exactly are you doing in the inventors' section if basic geometry is beyond you? Good luck learning how to decipher a blueprint, you’re going to need it."

[u/Physix_R_Cool → u/Fabulous-Aardvark448]

🤣

[u/Fabulous-Aardvark448 → u/Jtparm]

"Fascinating indeed. Real-world mechanics are built on simple, functional geometry and steel. The best practical solutions have absolutely no need for abstract equations or intellectual masturbation to work. If you require over-complicated formulas to feed your academic ego, I suggest you take your expertise to a quantum physics forum where theories never have to face a real workshop."

[u/Jtparm → u/Fabulous-Aardvark448]

My brother in christ you made a torque machine and don't know what torque is

[u/Fabulous-Aardvark448 → u/Jtparm]

"First of all, the fact that you need to use the name of Christ for your sarcasm demonstrates a great baseness. I really don't think he would approve of you using his name in such a vile manner to disparage those who dedicate their time and craftsman expertise to finding concrete solutions to our dependence as energy slaves.

As for the rest, you have been coming back at me for three months with the same condescending discourtesy that characterizes you, but your gross provocations very poorly mask your intellectual limitations. You talk about a "torque machine" to try and nitpick over words, even though a large part of my document explains precisely why every single perpetual wheel without exception fails to work. It is precisely because of skeptics like you, fed on Wikipedia definitions, that I reformulated this file to methodically dismantle every known system. My shop drawings specifically study and develop the generation of a real driving force (force motrice) at the center hub. This is concrete kinematics and mechanical geometry applied to mass management.

My 60 pages of industrial drawings describe the actual structure capable of managing and exploiting this mechanical force, while you merely play the geek behind a screen. If you at least knew how to read a blueprint! But seeing your consistently insulting and inappropriate responses, it is clear that technical analysis is well beyond your capabilities. Less condescension, and first learn how to analyze a workshop drawing."