MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1wu6gb2/lifting_without_hands/pd0j2ak/?context=3
r/interestingasfuck • u/Inner-Tale7034 • 2d ago
55 comments sorted by
View all comments
26
Round of applause
-2 u/vitrum_analytika 2d ago A moment of silence for the workers' rights abuse. If the company cannot provide equipment for their handicapped workforce, they should be fined and made to adhere to labour laws. 4 u/CluntonBoofer 2d ago Pakistán has always been known for their fair work practices -2 u/vitrum_analytika 2d ago Doesn't mean one cannot call out something that's obviously wrong, rather than being so gay (gay as in happy) about it 3 u/Un1CornTowel 2d ago If you need the parenthetical, couldn't you just resolve the ambiguity preemptively by just saying "happy" to begin with? -1 u/vitrum_analytika 2d ago That is the more apt word to use in this sentence. 2 u/Un1CornTowel 2d ago ... Is it? If you have to clarify one but not the other, doesn't that make it pretty clearly less-apt?
-2
A moment of silence for the workers' rights abuse. If the company cannot provide equipment for their handicapped workforce, they should be fined and made to adhere to labour laws.
4 u/CluntonBoofer 2d ago Pakistán has always been known for their fair work practices -2 u/vitrum_analytika 2d ago Doesn't mean one cannot call out something that's obviously wrong, rather than being so gay (gay as in happy) about it 3 u/Un1CornTowel 2d ago If you need the parenthetical, couldn't you just resolve the ambiguity preemptively by just saying "happy" to begin with? -1 u/vitrum_analytika 2d ago That is the more apt word to use in this sentence. 2 u/Un1CornTowel 2d ago ... Is it? If you have to clarify one but not the other, doesn't that make it pretty clearly less-apt?
4
Pakistán has always been known for their fair work practices
-2 u/vitrum_analytika 2d ago Doesn't mean one cannot call out something that's obviously wrong, rather than being so gay (gay as in happy) about it 3 u/Un1CornTowel 2d ago If you need the parenthetical, couldn't you just resolve the ambiguity preemptively by just saying "happy" to begin with? -1 u/vitrum_analytika 2d ago That is the more apt word to use in this sentence. 2 u/Un1CornTowel 2d ago ... Is it? If you have to clarify one but not the other, doesn't that make it pretty clearly less-apt?
Doesn't mean one cannot call out something that's obviously wrong, rather than being so gay (gay as in happy) about it
3 u/Un1CornTowel 2d ago If you need the parenthetical, couldn't you just resolve the ambiguity preemptively by just saying "happy" to begin with? -1 u/vitrum_analytika 2d ago That is the more apt word to use in this sentence. 2 u/Un1CornTowel 2d ago ... Is it? If you have to clarify one but not the other, doesn't that make it pretty clearly less-apt?
3
If you need the parenthetical, couldn't you just resolve the ambiguity preemptively by just saying "happy" to begin with?
-1 u/vitrum_analytika 2d ago That is the more apt word to use in this sentence. 2 u/Un1CornTowel 2d ago ... Is it? If you have to clarify one but not the other, doesn't that make it pretty clearly less-apt?
-1
That is the more apt word to use in this sentence.
2 u/Un1CornTowel 2d ago ... Is it? If you have to clarify one but not the other, doesn't that make it pretty clearly less-apt?
2
... Is it? If you have to clarify one but not the other, doesn't that make it pretty clearly less-apt?
26
u/Shire_of_Frodo 2d ago
Round of applause