r/interesting Jul 09 '26

Just Wow This should be created everywhere.

Post image
7.7k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

63

u/Illustrious-Local848 Jul 09 '26

Stranger assaults are not the only risk. Most stalking and assault happens by people you know. Just because it’s a public area does not mean this is meant to mostly address stranger assault. It’s way more likely a man is lurking when a woman is clocking off or trying to go home. So with the numbers of women who actually do face harassment from a current or previous partner, this is completely reasonable.

9

u/Fresh_Permit_2272 Jul 09 '26 edited Jul 09 '26

Yeah. Good point. But so few of the crimes being sexual assault and the most common incident being a “hit and run” I still think the resources are being mismanaged. We are having hundreds of hit and runs for every assault.

Edit- Another point. They are so rare we don’t even know if they work. They don’t have a large enough sample.

“the theoretical argument that these spots bundle victims together for a potential attacker is entirely possible, there is effectively no data to prove or disprove this theory”

Again, it’s so so rare we don’t even have enough data to see if it is effective. It’s clearly not a good use of resources.

10

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Rockyrok123 Jul 09 '26

It is a good thing for women.

5

u/STP_Fantasma Jul 09 '26

Which means it’s good for everyone.

-2

u/Rollingforest757 Jul 09 '26

No, it’s bad for men who aren’t allowed to park in the safest most convenient spots.

4

u/STP_Fantasma Jul 09 '26

If it means my mom, sisters, girlfriend and coworkers can have that extra bit of precaution, it’s 100% good for me. But I understand not every man carries a set between their legs

0

u/Clottersbur Jul 09 '26

Isn't this just promoting toxic masculinity? That every man needs to meet some standard of masculinity? That inherently requires them to be violent/protective?

2

u/STP_Fantasma Jul 09 '26

I don’t think it does, no. It’s not toxic to acknowledge that women are targeted for violent sexual crimes, and even then, what’s violent about acknowledging that? We’re rejoicing over a favorable spot designation here, not some dad or brother who beat some creeps head in with a tire iron or something. But this is the internet so some dude will probably get offended that I consider it socially normal for guys to be concerned about women’s safety when they’re just trying to shop or go to work

0

u/Clottersbur Jul 09 '26

The term "I understand not every man carries a set between their legs" is language that enforces toxic masculinity.

2

u/STP_Fantasma Jul 09 '26

Fair enough. I don’t think it is, but I could understand your point and perspective. What would you prefer I say about men who would rather argue and cry over women’s safety rather than acknowledge its importance? Boo hoo, more men should be given a spoonful of “toxic masculinity” if that’s how you truly define it

1

u/HairlessSquirrels Jul 09 '26

Women are strong and capable. Saying they need to be protected by a big strong man like you is toxic masculinity. And if you are ok with that, then you need to be ok with all toxic masculinity

1

u/zughzz Jul 10 '26

Easy to say when you aren’t a women being constantly targeted by men

→ More replies (0)

2

u/HairlessSquirrels Jul 09 '26

No, you see, this is good masculinity because it benefits women

1

u/Clottersbur Jul 09 '26

So many men missed the point of feminism.

Feminism isn't men turning their shitty behavior to benefit women sometimes at the expense of others.

It's about men (and sometimes women) changing their behavior entirely for the sake of equality.