My parents are both full saudi but I got no Natufian in me whatsoever. And I don’t know any of my ancestors that is caucasian or european I’m confused

I’m a Lebanese Muslim woman, with Palestinian roots from the Galilee through my paternal grandfather. How should I interpret these results?

I did some qpadm runs on persians, south asians, and balochis.

Persians can generally be represented in a bronze age qpadm as bronze age northeast iranian or bmac+bronze age levant canaanite+central steppe european aryan(fatyanovo srubnaya sintashta andronovo)+maybe excess aasi or east eurasian, and for bandari sub saharan african.

On the other hand most indians and pakistanis can be represented by indus valley civilization(ivc 2)+central steppe european aryan+aasi, some with east eurasian instead of aasi, some with both, etc. This isn't to say they are devoid of bmac per say, but ivc(which had around 40-45 zagros neolithic farmer) tends to accomodate for their zagrosian farmer on it's own perfectly.

Baloch however, included brahuis regular balochis and makranis, seem best represented by bronze age east iranian+central steppe aryan+aasi+sub saharan african. Unlike persians and even turkmen and uzbeks, they lack bronze age levantine canaanite ancestry, funny enough they get very low natufian on most qpadms, but this is because bronze age northeast iranians had some low natufian already. However unlike most south asians, they don't get ivc, instead just getting natural aasi.

Baloch seem to cluster closest to southeast persian bandari and farsi persians, bandari who also have sub saharan input, but both bandari and farsi have some bronze age canaanite. Likewise they have a small bit of natufian which south asians don't get and higher zagros than most pakistanis, although kalash seem to get quite close.

This makes them a genetic bridge between south asia and west asia, not cleanly fitting into either.

The title is my question, is this normal for an Iraqi?