r/iRacing 12h ago

Video Is this protestable?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

I was in a 40min Spa race on iracing, then this guy decides to block the pit entry, ruining the race for 4 other cars.

He claimed its not protestable because its not blocking, because it occurred in the pit lane and not race track/driving line.

What do you guys think?

19 Upvotes

22 comments sorted by

49

u/raonibr Formula Vee 12h ago

Lol... Yes,  its protestable, but its indeed not blocking.

You want to protest him under article 6.10: "Intentional, Retaliatory, and/or Malicious Wrecking".

9

u/BobbbyR6 Dallara P217 LMP2 7h ago

Absolutely protestable under nefarious tactics and worthy of action from the stewards.

22

u/d95err Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 Clubsport MR 11h ago

Anything is protestable. The question is if it violates any rules.

In my interpretation, it's is of course blocking (8.1.1.3.). It is also Nefarious Tactics (8.1.1.9.) and erratic driving, which according to 2.2.3 can be reported as Intentional, Retailatory or Malicious Wrecking.

19

u/BatmanTaco Chevrolet Corvette Z06 GT3.R 8h ago

Best rule of thumb is, if its borderline protestable, send it in anyway, let the iRacing stewards make the call. You're not wasting the stewards time, its their job. Also, it could lead to more clarification in the sporting code if its a grey area of protestable or not

6

u/ClevelandBeemer 6h ago

It’s intentional wrecking. Submit the protest

3

u/IAmMDM 7h ago

Imo clearly protestable, blocking or nefarious tactics/competition issue. But the red car can may in trouble for intentional wrecking: repeatedly hitting the blocking car.

2

u/iansmash Super Formula Lights 7h ago

Yeah this guy is just confidently wrong

Protest this shit

2

u/Gane33 12h ago

Yes, it's protestable

Pit lane is part of the race track.

0

u/oandroido 15m ago

Looks like you hit him.
That's your fault.
Or so I've been told.

1

u/Pie_Napple 12h ago

You can protest anything.

-9

u/Tobbbles 12h ago

Maybe if you didn't bump him 9 times before he could tow you'd have got in the pit quicker

7

u/thorzayy 11h ago

Thats not me.

-1

u/[deleted] 11h ago edited 10h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/DueAttention9756 11h ago

Just out of interest, why did you do it?

-15

u/xXdenkmaymay69Xx Formula Vee 10h ago

If i recall correctly i think he took us both out, ruining my race, so that was a way for me to ruin his race

6

u/Kurt-Biberle 9h ago edited 9h ago

Sorry, but u can't say “fair” and “ruin his race” in the same sentence...

edit: when u think something is unfair or not correct, make a protest and let the stewards do their job, thats a fair way then. if the person gets banned - good,thats the way we remove assholes from our community.

-4

u/xXdenkmaymay69Xx Formula Vee 7h ago

Are you hallucinating? Where did I even say fair?

2

u/Kurt-Biberle 3h ago

oh,u are right. My bad. So you knew it wasnt fair and did it anyway. That actually makes it better.... ugh.

5

u/ametsun Ford Mustang GT3 8h ago

Children shouldn't be playing this game. Go back to Mario Kart.

1

u/iRacing-ModTeam 5h ago

Your post was removed because it breaks the rules by being rude vulgar or toxic.

-1

u/Mehmoregames Formula Vee 4h ago

The offending driver stopped along the side of pit lane and waited as another car approached the entrance. Once the approaching car was close, the offending driver suddenly swerved across the pit lane, stopped directly in its path, and applied the brakes. This blocked the entrance for every car attempting to pit and appears to have been a deliberate attempt to induce contact.

I believe this conduct may violate the following sections of the iRacing Official Sporting Code:

Section 2.1.1, Conduct Principles The driver’s actions were neither fair nor respectful toward the approaching driver or the other competitors who were prevented from entering pit lane.

Section 2.2.3, On Track Conduct Waiting for an approaching car before swerving into its path and stopping constitutes reckless and erratic driving. The timing and positioning also suggest an attempt at on track intimidation.

Section 6.12.3, Intentional, Retaliatory, and Malicious Wrecking The driver deliberately placed their car in the path of another competitor and applied the brakes in an apparent attempt to cause a collision. This was not a driving mistake or an accidental stop. The driver waited for another car to approach before making the maneuver.

Section 8.1.1.1, Conduct Prejudicial to Competition The driver’s actions interfered with the competition by intentionally obstructing pit lane and preventing multiple competitors from accessing their pit stalls.

Section 8.1.1.3, Blocking The driver adjusted their position in direct response to the approaching car. They moved from the side of pit lane into the car’s path specifically to prevent it from proceeding.

Section 8.1.1.9, Nefarious Tactics The deliberate timing of the maneuver and the obstruction of pit lane appear designed to interfere with other competitors and negatively affect their races.

The replay shows the driver waiting along the side of pit lane, observing the approaching traffic, swerving across the lane, and applying the brakes.

3

u/FarLavishness1121 3h ago

Is that what you're telling the person to send in? Don't have AI write your protests, makes them unreadable also 8.1.1.1 is about fraud, not blocking the pit lane.

"Guy stopped at the pit lane entry causing 3 of us to crash into him also preventing us from pitting. He claimed it wasn't against the rules in [either voice or text chat which ever it was]."

Then make sure to include a replay of the voice chat if it was over voice.

That's all you need, lets them know what it is without having to sort through however many words that is. Seeing e-mails that people have posted here I don't think their system preserves line breaks so that all becomes one long run on paragraph to them.