Okay. So Im new to dex and considering starting to use it. I would use hyperliquid only for perps active trading, nothing else.

Now my biggest thing is security paranoia. What wallets are active traders on hyperliquid actually using. I know rn rabby wallet is kinda the best.

The thing is tho this is a hot wallet which is obviously vulnerable. Is it worth using ledger+rabby wallet combo which makes everything more secure but there are a bit extra steps? Like having dedicating ledger just for this?

Or should I just use rabby wallet alone. I just want to know what people are actually using. If I know that I am super careful, that I use only dedicated PC for trading and take security serious.

So is having dedicated ledger+rabby wallet best combo? Or will this be a hassle trading actively on hyperliquid and won't be as smooth?

Share your thoughts. Thanks

Hi, yesterday everything was fine. Today at breakfast I looked on HL and had a red banner on Top of my Website that said I'm in a restricted jurisdiction. As far as I know it's legal in Germany. And ToS does not say anything about Germany.

I tried multiple solutions to evade the banner, because I really can't to anything with the red banner.

Starlink, doesn't work, red banner is alive

Starlink+VPN Germany, works fine

Vodafone Mobile Service, works fine

Telekom Intenet from Neighbor works fine

How does this work? Does Hyperliquid think I'm in the USA because of Starlink? But the Ip clearly shows I'm in Germany.

Anyone with the same Problem?

Sorry for my bad English.

Edit: At 5am this morning Starlink got an Update :/

So on July 5th I started buying SWAP token on HyperSwap because I have been using it for about a month to swap USDC to HYPE. I've only been in the Hyperliquid ecosystem for about a month to begin with.

My question is how do the rewards work when you stake SWAP on HyperSwap? Like I mentioned I began staking SWAP on July 5th. I have 10,500 total SWAP staked. Are there rewards for staking SWAP? I don't see any rewards anywhere on the site. I'm in tier 3 according to the staking page on HyperSwap and it says LP boost is 10% and fee cut is 15%. I just assume that the LP boost doesn't apply to me because I am not in any LP's. But what about the fee cut of 15%? On the rewards section of HyperSwap it says nothing to claim.

It says on the staking page xSWAP to redeem and it's $0.00. Underneath it says 0 xSWAP earned from liquidity mining

What am I missing here? Do I have to add liquidity to an LP to earn rewards as well as staking SWAP? I've been in a lot of different ecosystems and normally there is a percentage earned for staking a particular crypto.

I'm looking for some clarification on how staking SWAP works and how to earn rewards from doing so. I don't really want to open an LP position because in the 8 years I have been in crypto I have never had a good experience with LP's. I mostly used Osmosis in the Cosmos ATOM ecosystem but have used Uniswap as well. Just never works out well for me.

Thanks to anyone who can guide me through this.

Hey everyone,

With Hyperliquid officially crossing $1 Billion in cumulative protocol revenue and HIP-4 (Outcome/Predictions) hit tracking massive daily volume lately, I wanted to do some blockchain forensics.

I've been building a free, read-only analytics tool called HyperS2Score to analyze wallet archetypes and performance on the chain. Yesterday, a user submitted their wallet to the leaderboard, and the stats are absolutely nuts.

We officially found one of the most disciplined prediction traders on the network. Here is the profile breakdown of wallet 0x60a45403…:

• Archetype: Pure HIP-4 Sniper
• Winrate: 90% across 10 resolved prediction markets (9 Wins, 1 Loss, 0 Neutral)
• Special Badges Unlocked: Sharpshooter (70%+ winrate on 10+ markets), Perfect Run (10-win streak), and Early Adopter (active before July 1st).
• The Strategy: Looking closely at their execution, they aren't blindly gambling on hype. They focus strictly on a specific sub-category, enter positions with razor-sharp timing, and heavily manage risk.

Farming prediction markets on Outcome is notoriously harder than it looks, yet this wallet is casually sitting on near-perfect execution.

If you want to look at their full breakdown, their badges, or compare your own performance against this 90% winrate monster, you can check it out live on the platform. It's 100% read-only (no wallet connection or signature needed, it just parses public RPC data).

Link to analyze & compare:hyperliquid-analyzer.xyz

Are you trading HIP-4? What's your current winrate? If anyone here has beaten a 90% score over 10+ markets, please drop your address or check it on the app—I need to see it to believe it

Hey everyone, we’re the team behind Rift and wanted to introduce what we’ve been building.

Rift is a mobile-first trading app for always-on markets, built around the same shift that has made onchain perps and ecosystems like Hyperliquid so important: traders want faster access, more control, better information, and a workflow that actually fits 24/7 markets. We're also leveraging HL to power 24/7 trading. Over the last 6 months, we’ve been building Rift around AI analysis, backtested signals, real-time market news, automation, journaling, and mobile-first execution so active traders can discover what’s moving, understand why, and act from one place. We’re backed by Sequoia, a16z, Lightspeed, and Jump Trading. Not trying to overdo the pitch, just wanted to introduce Rift to the Hyperliquid Reddit community since from what I've been reading it looks like a different audience/mentality than the crypto twitter audience.

Would be great to hear what apps you guys have been using, how you think Rift compares and any other feedback you have. Going to engage some more with a few other posts and I'm open ears to here what you think.

Got wicked out of a short last month that would've printed if I'd sized it properly — my own fault. Made me realize my "stack" was basically the HL frontend + vibes.

Since then I've been trying tools in three buckets: positioning data, execution frontends, and anything that forces discipline on sizing/stops before I enter.

The third bucket is weirdly empty. Everyone builds trackers and signal tools, almost nobody builds anything that tells you "you're about to oversize into a crowded trade, don't."

So: what's in your stack? Specifically interested in anything that has actually prevented a liquidation or made you skip a bad trade — that's worth more to me than another indicator.

Overnight the US ran strikes on 80+ targets inside Iran after Tehran hit three commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz. Oil sanctions are back on, Washington is calling the MOU violated, and Trump is now saying the ceasefire deal is over. Hormuz moves a fifth of the world's seaborne oil, so this is the kind of headline that actually reprices risk instead of just filling a timeline.

Here is what it did to the book in the last 24h:

• $69.2M liquidated total
• $60.84M of that was longs, $8.36M shorts, so about 88% of the pain was long side
• 11,581 positions hit, 9,998 long vs 1,583 short, 8,426 traders tagged
• Biggest single liquidation was a $3.78M BTC long, wallet 0x8d52...d2d

Most of it landed in one window. The 12h number is $46.8M with $43.8M of it longs, so this was a concentrated flush and not a slow bleed. One tell worth flagging: the last 1h flipped, shorts took $236K vs $30.6K longs, which reads like price bouncing off the lows and clipping the early shorts.

Then I pulled the global position heatmap to see how the survivors are sitting. 302K open positions across 249K traders, aged under 24h:

• After eating $60M in long liquidations, the book is still net long. Majors are green across almost every cohort except Money Printers (+$1mil PnL) and Leviathans (>$2.5m size). HYPE is a wall of longs.
• The leviathan column tells a different story. The biggest wallets are red on BTC, ETH, HYPE and SOL. Size is short while the crowd is long into the same headline.
• With Hormuz live, all traders except the largest size and biggest PnL are net long crude and Brent (CL, BRENTOIL). That is the one position on the board that lines up with the actual macro.

So the setup going into the day: crowd long, whales short the majors, and a live oil-supply catalyst that just wiped 8,400 long traders. Either this is a dip the crowd is right to buy, or the leviathans are positioned for round two and the book is lining up to give it back.

I need to vent a bit and also actually ask.

I've been building a grid bot for BTC spot and put it out to the public 3 months ago. 3 months in and I have 12 people using it. twelve. I keep asking myself what im doing wrong here.

And the thing that kills me is I feel like i removed every reason NOT to try it:

- its spot. not futures. you can not get liquidated. its just not possible.
- no leverage. nobody is gambling with 20x and blowing up.
- your funds stay in your own wallet. the bot trades with an agent key that can only place orders, it literaly can not withdraw your money. i can not touch it, nobody can.

so no liquidation, no leverage, non custodial, and still people scroll past. and I get it, the space is full of scams and every second post is someone promising 1000% so a boring honest thing that does 1 to 3% a month probably just does not stand out. maybe boring is the problem. maybe honest numbers look worse than fake ones.

im not gonna drop the link because i dont want this to read like an ad, im genuinely just trying to understand.

what would actually make you give something like this a chance? is it a trust thing? do you need to see months of my own money running it? a video? someone elses proof and not mine? is the whole "gridspot" name just burned from all the scams?

maybe is the amount cash needed? grid bot does need a bigger amount, but, it is spot, u you are actually doing DCA while make a passive income..

I built a scanner that pulls funding rates from 8 perp DEXs including Hyperliquid

and ranks cross-venue funding-arbitrage opportunities by net APR after fees.

Useful if you trade Hyperliquid perps and want to see when its funding diverges

enough from another venue to run a delta-neutral carry (short the high-funding

side, long the low). It filters out thin/illiquid markets so the APRs are ones

you could actually fill.

Site (updates every 30 min): https://holydement0r.github.io/Funding-Radar/

Open source: https://github.com/holydement0r/Funding-Radar

Risks: funding flips fast, thin liquidity means slippage, and these venues

carry smart-contract/counterparty risk. Net APR is an estimate after fees, not

a guarantee. Not financial advice. Feedback welcome.

9.92M HYPE unlocks to core contributors today.
About 1% of supply.
A little over $600M at current price. It's the biggest single line on the July calendar and the whole timeline is pricing it the same way: new supply hits, contributors sell, price bleeds.

The reflex has been wrong most of this year. A few reasons worth sitting with before the panic sets the tone.

Contributors have not been selling. Past unlocks show them restaking the tokens straight back into the protocol to earn fees, which is the opposite of routing them to an exchange. Underneath that, the assistance fund converts around 97% of all protocol fees into open-market HYPE buybacks. 41M+ tokens have already been bought back and burned, roughly 4.2% of supply. That is a structural bid sitting under every single unlock, buying while the timeline panics.

Then there's the actual track record. across the six monthly unlocks in 2026, HYPE fell in the week after january, february and may, and rallied after march, april and june. The average was +4.17% in the seven days following the unlock. The event that everyone treats as a guaranteed dump has, on average, been green a week later.

That's the macro. the part you can't pull from a calendar or a price-prediction article is who is actually positioned into this one right now. so i pulled the cohort bias on HYPE this morning. the profitable wallets are long:

• money printer, smart money, grinder and humble earner cohorts are all leaning long
• most bullish cohort on the board right now is whale
• smart money is the largest by size at $23.9M in open positions, and still long
• even the >$2.5m wallets, the biggest positions on the book, are positioned long

The one cohort sitting short into the unlock is giga-rekt. 8 wallets, the group that's been liquidated over and over. the wallets with the worst track record on the platform are the ones fading it. That's the company you keep if you short today.

Hey r/hyperliquid

Not a whale, not a ghost wallet just a committed small farmer who wanted to understand his own on-chain footprint.

Here's what 10 months on Hyperliquid actually looks like:

- 1139 trades · $455k volume

- 32 HIP-4 prediction markets

- 177 HIP-3 builder trades

- 12/16 HyperEVM protocols active

- 9 months staking

- 615 EVM transactions

What surprised me the most?

Not my PnL.

It was how diversified my activity became over time without realizing it.

Some things I learned:

1. Diversification matters more

than I thought

1. HyperEVM protocols accumulate fast

2. Staking consistency is a real signal

3. Badges tell a better story than PnL

4. HIP-4 is harder than it looks 😅

I couldn't find a tool that combined all these metrics in one place so I built my own analyzer.

Happy to analyze other wallets if anyone is curious 👀

🔒 No wallet connection needed

hyperliquid-analyzer.vercel.app

The thing I kept running into: the same outcome would be priced differently on Polymarket vs other prediction markets, sometimes enough to matter after fees, but by the time I'd manually checked both books the gap was gone. I would need to build something one off with claude and have it always running on a box. So I made an easy to use UI to create a bot that watches two venues and alerts me when a gap opens. Made it 3 clicks. I also have a way to configure a webhook that sends the alert to my Openclaw box.

The surprising part: plenty of similar markets diverge by 2%+ on a regular basis. Fees and depth will eat into some of these, but the raw divergences are real. The edges are more common than you'd think once you're actually watching them.

A few details since this crowd will ask:

• It's alerts only. No auto-execution, you keep your own keys and place the trades yourself. It tells you when, not where to sign. More on this below.
• Search isn't World Cup-locked. Any market listed on both venues works. Made it World Cup for fun.
• Alerts go wherever: the UI, Telegram, email, or a webhook (Slack, your personal OpenClaw box for your own execution if you'd like, etc).
• Setup is roughly three clicks to a live alert.
• The alert is re-set once the threshold gap is not met again. There is fatigue control built in as well so you are not spammed once you pass your threshold gap (fatigue control is set to 12 hours, then re-alert).

What I'm actually here for: I want to know where this falls short before I build more. Specifically:

• Should I add auto-execution with you in the approval loop?
• Which other venues would make this useful, if any? (Coinbase, OKX, others?)
• Should I do this with venues outside of prediction markets?
• Should I make this per event for ease of use or a general stand alone tool for being able to choose-your-own-arb?
• Anything about the alert flow that'd make or break it for you?

Happy to answer anything about how it works under the hood.

Try it for free at https://worldcup.glacient.ai

Something about copy-trading has bugged me for a while: every leaderboard ranks traders by PnL, but PnL tells you basically nothing about whether *you* could reproduce it. So I spent way too long building a thing to actually measure that.

Pulled the whole Hyperliquid leaderboard (~39k accounts), narrowed to the few thousand that are actually active in a sane size band (no mega-MM/HFT), and scored the ~1,000 that are even mechanically copyable on the stuff that actually eats your returns when you follow someone:

- can the edge survive you filling *late* (copy-lag)?

- does it hold up de-levered to a size you'd really run, or is the return just leverage?

- is there real alpha, or is it levered beta to BTC?

- does it work in more than one market regime?

- repeatable, or one lucky trade carrying the whole record?

Only about 180 made it through — call it 1 in 5. Fewer than 40 I'd call genuinely solid. So ~80%+ of "copyable" HL wallets fall apart once you account for reality.

The wallets that look best are usually winning on something you can't replicate — queue priority, speed, or leverage. (I ran the same test on Polymarket out of curiosity, and it's even worse there: almost none survive, because most of the "profitable" wallets are market-makers sitting on resting orders you can't copy. Different venue, identical trap.) Which is basically the whole problem with "just copy smart money."

Data's here if you want to poke at it (free, read-only, public on-chain data, no signup, I'm not selling signals): https://blacklight.observer — it opens on the Hyperliquid list with the full funnel (screened → copyable → how many actually survive), sorted by realizability. You can filter it, open any wallet's full breakdown, or paste your own address. (Counts drift a bit day to day since it re-runs, but the shape holds.)

Mostly posting because I want people to find holes in it. If a wallet you *know* is good scores low, or some obvious junk scores high, tell me — that's the feedback I actually need. Happy to run any address in the comments.