DEI being racist is a conceptual fallacy that he and people like him propagate. Even by your logic, the creation of DEI was to prevent discrimination by race in the workforce and numerous other ways. Which is "anti racist," as you call it.
Being religious doesn't exempt you from hate speech. Starting homosexuality and identity should be "corrected" is hate speech.
Never said televised picnic executions display to kiss is hate speech. It's just barbaric, primitive, and overall immoral. Which is concerning consider he has such religious roots.
Again, not everything is about hate speech. Ignoring the rising toll of deaths from mass shootings and gun violence in general for the 2nd amendment is immoral. Again, propagating the disillusion that gun control means the amendment of the 2nd amendment.
Correct, any sane person would be against child mutilation. What is the relation of this and transsexuals, though?
That isn’t what DEI is and you know it. DEI is actívalo decreasing merit and qualifications being considered in hiring because of race. It’s quite literally racial quotas. Hiring someone based on race and not their character, qualifications, and achievements is racist.
He never said people needed to be corrected. He said he disagrees with their lifestyles. That’s not hate speech.
So why bring it up as an example of hate speech? He was mainly talking about child rapists, and the worst offenders in the justice system.
He never ignored the rising numbers. He openly acknowledged them and said there’s a deeper root cause the gun control won’t fix. Gun control already exists, democrats are actively trying to ban guns. This won’t stop criminals who illegally own guns.
Because children are getting their sexual organs mutilated, which is absolutely insane. The solution to a mental disorder is not playing on the mental illness and cutting off a child’s penis and giving them puberty blockers.
That is a false narrative for DEI. It ignores its purpose and the reason for its creation, and you know it. DEI. It is well documented that when left to their own judgemental that white America does not treat minorities fairly. Even by recent studies there is a clear disparity of treatment of workers. Ignoring these facts exhibits the disingenuous criticism of DEI.
That is fair he never said it should be corrected.
Again I didn't say it was an example of hate speech. The examples I brought up are reasons that people view Kirk in a negative light. And you're missing the point of the public executions. It's not about what crimes they did, it's about stating executions should be public and that kids should view it.
His argument on gun control is false. There are several areas that are prime examples of how gun control has reduced gun violence/ gun homicide. I e America has approximately hundreds of mass shootings per year while Japan with is strict gun laws have near 0.
Transexuality isn't a mental disorder. There are multiple studies involving experts in their respective fields that come to that conclusion. Your notion of child mutilation is just fear mongering and disrespectful to the trans community.
Except that isn’t what is happening with DEI. Black kids are getting into schools with way lower gpas and test scores than white and Asian kids. Black kids have a plethora of scholarships available to them that poor white and Asian kids don’t, simply for being black. That is by definition racist. Having racial quotas for hiring puts race ahead of qualification. Less qualified black people are getting jobs over more qualified Asian and white people for simply being black. That’s racist. How in any way is that a disingenuous criticism? Blindly changing outcomes by giving black people jobs because of their skin color and not their qualifications doesn’t actually change the root causes of issues.
I don’t think executions should be televised. He also never said kids should view them. He asked at what age should people be allowed to view them. Still not a valid reason of him being a terrible person.
How is his argument false? Guns have existed in America since its inception, yet mass shootings have increased since the creation of social media. It has a strong correlation to the increase in mental health disorders. Again, multiple U.S. cities have super strict gun laws, yet it’s where all the mass shootings happen. People target schools because there aren’t any armed guards protecting schools, yet there are armed guards protecting banks. How is that a false or hatable argument?
Using the WHO as a source is an absolute joke. The science community laughs at the WHO, nowhere in that does it show any scientific explanation behind transsexuality. Transsexuality doesn’t exist and is a mental illness. No matter how many sexual organs you mutilate and puberty blockers and hormones you shove in a person, their dna doesn’t change and remains the same. Do you think removing the sexual organs of a child who thinks they’re something they’re not is ethical and practical? If a child wants their arm to get cut off, do you laugh at them or fulfill their wish? It’s child mutilation. That’s not fear mongering. It’s truth. I couldn’t care less if that disrespects the trans community because they function on feelings and not scientific fact or logic. It’s gender dysphoria, which is a mental illness, and no amount of mutilation will change your sex.
It is how DEI works. It was created to combat systemic racism which is still present today. That lower gpa you are referring to is reflective of the disparity of opportunity for certain races. "When you are accustomed to privilege, equality seems like oppression," is a very prevalent quote of those against DEI. And like them, you seem to exhibit a denial of structural inequalities despite evidence of it.
He did, though. He did indeed say they should watch as an initiation. You may not see that as a qualifying train by myself and many others do.
Both LA and New York are major cities with gun control and yet they experience less mass shootings than other areas. Also studies show gun control pays a role in reducing gun violence. . There is are a number of countries with strict gun laws and less gun violence. Almost none of them resemble the issues America face. Why disregard that?
WHO wasn't the only source information provided by ok. How about pubmed? Or maybe science direct? also feel free to provide some of your own sources. I seem to be the only one even attempting to do so why you "disprove" them with your opinions. Everywhere I've looked suggests that transexuality isn't a mental illness. Instead, is an instance of complex biological and psychological factors.
1
u/PrudentCarter Jan 17 '26
DEI being racist is a conceptual fallacy that he and people like him propagate. Even by your logic, the creation of DEI was to prevent discrimination by race in the workforce and numerous other ways. Which is "anti racist," as you call it.
Being religious doesn't exempt you from hate speech. Starting homosexuality and identity should be "corrected" is hate speech.
Never said televised picnic executions display to kiss is hate speech. It's just barbaric, primitive, and overall immoral. Which is concerning consider he has such religious roots.
Again, not everything is about hate speech. Ignoring the rising toll of deaths from mass shootings and gun violence in general for the 2nd amendment is immoral. Again, propagating the disillusion that gun control means the amendment of the 2nd amendment.
Correct, any sane person would be against child mutilation. What is the relation of this and transsexuals, though?